View Single Post
      09-19-2012, 01:29 PM   #303
mapezzul
Special Agent
mapezzul's Avatar
United_States
74
Rep
1,731
Posts

Drives: Depends on the day!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bavaria

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by US///M3 View Post
Some here are dreaming,they think a 450hp 3.0 twin turbo will have the same mpg of a 300hp 3.0 twin turbo engine.
The 480hp 3.8 twin turbo v6 gtr engine gets about 16/23 mpg.
The 444hp 5.0 NA V8 found in the Boss 302 17/26 mpg.
The target was a 20% bump in economy over the V8 (IIRC). 6th in the manual is expected to be taller as well as 7 in the DCT as those are rarely if ever used on a track.

I have also heard that this engine is M's first take on using the Valvetronic system to basically emulate cylinder deactivation to improve MPG.

25 mpg on the highway is a round number and seems like it can be done.

My E90 M3 yields a max mpg of 20 when I have a tail wind going down hill and in the city maybe at best snake eyes as I do not have stop/start. It drinks gas like I drink bier

I welcome the fuel economy improvement and while it may not offset the loss of the soundtrack it will be easier on the wallet which unless you print money or have a money tree is always a good thing
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Appreciate 0