09-23-2014, 06:09 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant
77
Rep 549
Posts |
M4 vs M3 e92 (tune) [video]
Film car- e92 m3 (manual, bpm tune, test pipe, macht schnell intake)
VS BMW M4 ( stock) VS e92 m3 (dct, bpm tune, test pipe, intake, pulley) As we can see, tune e92 is faster on a big speeds. Now I wanna see how the tune m4 will pass the tune m3 e92)
__________________
F80 M3 SO/SO |BM3 St.1 91 oct.|Cattless DPs|Tractive P'n'P|Brembo 6pot|Rays G25 with CUP2 tires|GTS coding|
1M VO FBO (KW DDC) PTF st.2+ sold e90 335i FBO jb4 sold Last edited by jackkk; 09-07-2017 at 05:39 AM.. |
09-23-2014, 06:13 AM | #2 |
11099
Rep 27,826
Posts |
all three cars seem like they are flying!
__________________
BEFORE YOU BUY YOUR NEXT BMW, EMAIL OUR GUY KOTE FIRST! Kote M Sales:Kotem@bmwofcamarillo.com Cell:805-368-9101 vipfinance@bmwofcamarillo.com for warranties! |
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 07:34 AM | #4 | |
Lieutenant General
7730
Rep 12,402
Posts |
Quote:
In before E9x vs F80/2 war starts. P.S. Thanks for sharing OP.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 08:02 AM | #5 | |
Gone Fishin’
7345
Rep 12,131
Posts |
Quote:
Anyway - very interesting video. I would have thought the F80 would have gotten the torque jump to start the race if anything. I guess that's where I'm surprised. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 11:33 AM | #7 |
Captain
131
Rep 690
Posts |
torque is less important that people think.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 12:13 PM | #9 | |
Banned
82
Rep 2,685
Posts |
Quote:
I've learned that while racing against my friends Stingray from rolls, I seem to always take a lead as soon as we get on it, no matter what gear, I would have expected the opposite from a car that has a much better tq/weight ratio then mine! Overhall it's pretty equal between us exept for that little lead that I take at the beginning! here's what a 3rd gear pull looked like: |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 12:20 PM | #11 | |
Captain
119
Rep 922
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
'11 Black/Black GLK350 (Wife)
'19 Black RAM 1500 Big Horn Night Package '11 Loaded AW Fox Red/Black/Black Carbon Leather ZCP E90 M3 (Halloween Delivery) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 12:22 PM | #12 | |
Banned
82
Rep 2,685
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 01:02 PM | #13 |
Captain
131
Rep 690
Posts |
people also forget that exotic cars like Ferrari are not torque monsters. they have a lot more HP than torque. Because on a track, or rolling racing. Torque is less important.
torque makes your trip to wallmart more fun. that is what torque does. I also hating looking at 0-60 times, or 1/4 mile times. beucase those kind of races are only about how well you can grip. I have seen a stock E92 M3 beat a 2014 GT500 at the drag strip because the GT500 was spinning more. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 01:24 PM | #14 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 155
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 01:48 PM | #15 | ||
Banned
82
Rep 2,685
Posts |
Quote:
What I'm saying is that I think that even if an E9x trap a bit slower the an F8x, it could still mean that on the highway, at higher speed, the E9x will be faster. Take the 1M again as an exemple, it's a ~110mph trap car, a stock manual e9x M3 is a ~111mph, despite them trapping very close to each other, the 1M at highway speed can't even dream of competing angainst the M3! The way I would explain those similar traps is that the 1M accelarate faster then the M3 at the beginning of the 1/4 mile while the E9x accelerate faster at the end, which would mean that on a highway pull like in this video the 1M would have no chance even if they have similar traps! |
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 03:01 PM | #16 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 155
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 03:21 PM | #18 | ||
Banned
82
Rep 2,685
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 05:18 PM | #19 |
Major General
599
Rep 5,396
Posts |
C and d tested a manual at113 mph
But I also think part of the issue for the 1m is it's awful aero. It is very unstable and innefjcient at high speeds compared to the m3. It's evident on the track in both. That was the only downside to my 1m on track imo |
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 06:42 PM | #21 | |
Banned
82
Rep 2,685
Posts |
Quote:
As for the aero on the 1M, maybe it's bad, but it's clearly the engine that runs out of breath the real problem. I did a lot of second gear pulls against my friend on the highway and it was always the same thing, dead even up to end of my third where I start to go kind of easily and then shift in fourth and simply go like it was nothing. The aero would'nt play that big of a role at around ~150-200km/h, again IMO! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2014, 07:06 PM | #22 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 155
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|