BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Forum > BMW M3 (F80) and BMW M4 (F82) General Forum

Post Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-17-2013, 03:53 AM   #23
New Member

Drives: BMW M3 M-DCT Convertible
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Africa

Posts: 12
iTrader: (0)

Not sure

Me too I have associated the name "M3" with an icon....The M4 does not go down well. More like some other car from the Japaneese or Chineese manufacturer.
Appreciate 0
      01-18-2013, 01:38 AM   #24

pkimM3r's Avatar
Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

Posts: 7,321
iTrader: (0)

Originally Posted by bigjae1976
Originally Posted by SamS View Post
Aside from the few folks that go the supercharger route.... I challenge you to find any street-legal situation where 414HP is not "enough".
Hell, tell me that 414hp on the track is inadequate. I would really like the next M3 to go back to E46 M3 power levels with a bit more torque and weigh around 3000lbs. That would be brilliant!
//M2. Problem solved!
Appreciate 0
      01-20-2013, 04:10 PM   #25
Enlisted Member

Drives: X3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: United States

Posts: 39
iTrader: (0)

I've been following the rumors for a while. The older rumors were saying "450hp+" but in the past few months BMW marketing flacks seem to have taken every possible opportunity to temper expectations and say that it will have the similar power to the current M3 with more torque and less weight.

I don't know why it would have much less than 450hp. The new I3/4/6 engine platform was supposed to deliver up to 75hp per cylinder. They are already proving that out with the 220hp 1.5L I3 going in the BMW i8 car. They should easily be able to get 450hp out of a 3.0-3.2L I6. And why wouldn't they when the Audi RS4/5 already makes 450 and the next C63 is going to make about, if not significantly more than, 500hp.
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2013, 07:01 PM   #26
First Lieutenant

Reznick's Avatar
Drives: 2008 M3 ,2000 330
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Syracuse NY

Posts: 386
iTrader: (0)

Even if the HP isn't increased , that doesn't mean you won't see a broader torque range, and that will make a difference.
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2013, 04:57 PM   #27
Brigadier General

Drives: blue
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: f y'all, I'm from Texas (RGV)

Posts: 4,203
iTrader: (1)

100tq more and 300 pounds lighter. Sounds like a winner to me. You will have way more area under the curve...
ERnie 2011 AW/e90/n55 12.9@107.53mph
*N55 Moderator*
I'm crawling similar to a ant cuz I'm low to the earth
Appreciate 0
Post Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,,,,,,,,, logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST