04-01-2014, 09:49 PM | #89 |
(Sold) '00 M Roadster '06 M Coupe '16 M3 '20 X3MC
1545
Rep 2,585
Posts |
Wow it would cost me $4,000 more to get a M3 over a S6 with similar options, that's insane BMW. I know they are different sized cars but still a M3 should not be priced this high, should have made more options standard.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:20 PM | #91 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 130
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:21 PM | #92 | ||
Moderator
7506
Rep 19,370
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:31 PM | #94 |
Private First Class
8
Rep 129
Posts |
Do it...totally different beast.
__________________
2013 BMW M3 E92 Melbourne Red/Blk ZCP 6MT
2011 BMW M3 E92 MR/Blk ZCP 2007 Porsche 997.1S 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red/Blk |
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:33 PM | #95 |
Private First Class
8
Rep 129
Posts |
Well regarding the weight, on the BMWUSA website the E92 was quoted at 3770 I believe or around there.
Also, when you go to features and specs they are showing a E92 M3...
__________________
2013 BMW M3 E92 Melbourne Red/Blk ZCP 6MT
2011 BMW M3 E92 MR/Blk ZCP 2007 Porsche 997.1S 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red/Blk |
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:35 PM | #96 | |
Private First Class
8
Rep 129
Posts |
Quote:
Dave
__________________
2013 BMW M3 E92 Melbourne Red/Blk ZCP 6MT
2011 BMW M3 E92 MR/Blk ZCP 2007 Porsche 997.1S 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red/Blk |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:37 PM | #97 |
Banned
4143
Rep 6,926
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:40 PM | #98 |
Lieutenant General
609
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Nope, 3704 lb. This is a screen grab from the brochure but the website matched the brochure.
__________________
E92 M3 | Space Gray on Fox Red | M-DCT | CF Roof | RAC RG63 Wheels | Brembo 380mm BBK | | Vorsteiner Ti Exhaust | Matte Black Grilles/Side Gills/Rear Emblem/Mirrors | | Alekshop Back up Camera | GP Thunders | BMW Aluminum Pedals | Elite Angels | | XPEL Full Front Wrap | Hardwired V1 | Interior Xenon Light Kit | |
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 10:44 PM | #99 |
Banned
4143
Rep 6,926
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2014, 11:55 PM | #108 |
Major
991
Rep 1,370
Posts |
looks like the cloth interior actually gives you leather on the sides of the seat, bolsters AND on the door armrest..
so correct me if i'm wrong, the extended leather just makes the whole seat leather? |
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2014, 12:00 AM | #109 |
Banned
30
Rep 496
Posts |
First off they still use e92 M3 pic under specs lol
But more important as many of us predicted there is virtually no weight loss especially with dct which is almost 75 pounds heavier than outgoing dct. A true example of the benefit of high rpm power as you don't need as heavy parts of drive train. Curb listed for M3 3585 vs 3700 listed for e92. Basically 100 pounds. Those weights are with driver, 5 gallons fuel, luggage etc so knock off 180-200 pounds for true weight. I think they marketed the heck out of the 300 pound weight saving but 100 pounds frankly isn't much. Take out back seats in e92 M3 and get rid of the tire repair kit and you save 100. However clearly power is way under rated and will likely dyno at wheels 400 HP. Which is huge hugs leap over e92 that did 340-350. So this thing will bexa rocket and right nose to nose with cat less, tuned e92 m3 |
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2014, 12:09 AM | #110 |
Banned
30
Rep 496
Posts |
Anyone else find gear ratios odd? First gear dct in f80 is significantly more aggressive than e92 which will make 1st useless given low end torque of 400. E92 was almost over in a blink with 295 torques and less aggressive gearing. 2nd , 3rd and 4th are signicantly more aggressive in e92 ( about 15-17 percent shorter) which about equalizes relative lack of engine torque. Weird first her choice for f80
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|