|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-27-2024, 02:32 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 507
Posts |
FS: ideal track square setup bimmerworld TA16 forged black 18x10.5 et27 square
https://www.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...php?p=31012816
This is the ideal squared setup for a forged wheel. +27 is okay to fit 295/30/18 200tw tires and my friends have done it before. |
03-27-2024, 10:22 AM | #2 | |
Lieutenant
420
Rep 518
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-27-2024, 04:14 PM | #4 |
Major General
2164
Rep 5,548
Posts |
10.5et27 is pretty aggressive for the rear of a f8x especially if you want to run a 295 rear tire. The ideal setup for a 10.5 square setup is 10.5et36. A 9 mm more aggressive offset means the wheel is another 0.35” outboard. Here’s a link to the 18” square setup thread showing many different 18x10.5 setups with 10.5et36 being the best square setup for running a 295 rear tire:
https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1555419 |
Appreciate
0
|
03-27-2024, 04:16 PM | #5 | |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 507
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-27-2024, 04:44 PM | #6 |
Major General
2164
Rep 5,548
Posts |
lol…It has absolutely nothing to do with forged or flow formed. However, a flow-formed wheel with an appropriate offset is a better wheel than a forged wheel with an incorrect offset. You can claim the TA16 is a better wheel but that doesn’t make its offset ideal. If you’re advertising that a 295 easily fits then you should show installed pictures with a 295 (or even a 305 which supposedly fits too), not 275, tires.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-27-2024, 05:30 PM | #7 | |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 507
Posts |
Quote:
I have seen a few m4 in the forum with +20/22 295/30/18. I remembered a white one with white wheels and aero. You should spent more time to do some research and stop claiming +27 as incorrect. If it fits and doesn’t rub, why is it incorrect? I know +36 might be better, but if they both fit, what’s the difference? I would choose forged over flow form if they both fit |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|