10-17-2012, 01:48 PM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
101
Rep 360
Posts |
M3 vs RS5 (Turbo 6 vs Turbo 8)
Anyone think that BMW will surprise us with a slightly detuned version of the turbo-V8 found in the F10 M5 for the upcoming F82? The reason I ask is that M3’s immediate competition is still producing V8’s (RS5, C63, IS-F, CTS-V).
As an example here is how I compare Audi vs BMW: Audi A4 = BMW 328i/320i Audi A4 S-Line = BMW 328i Sport Line Audi S4/S5 = BMW 335is or M335i or 335i with M Sport Package or whatever they end-up calling it Audi RS5 = BMW M3 Since the RS5 is a turbo V8 do you think BMW will stick a turbo V8 in the F82 M4? Do you think it’s possible that the M3 Sedan will come with a turbo V6 to compete with the S4 and the M4 will come with a turbo V8 to compete against the RS5? I for one would love to see the next gen M3 with a turbo V8 instead of V6. Audi has decided to go with a turbo V8 in the RS5, S6, S7 & S8 so why can’t BMW share a slightly different turbo V8 across M3, M5 & M6? I don’t think that just because the M5/M6 already come with turbo V8's that the next gen M3 has to drop down to a turbo V6. What do you guys think? |
10-17-2012, 01:53 PM | #2 |
Second Lieutenant
27
Rep 247
Posts |
Not gonna happen. The engine has already been spied and its clearly inline 6 turbo
See the F80/F82 engine pics here http://www.f30post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=744293 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 02:07 PM | #3 | |
Bored all the time
382
Rep 2,173
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2014 991 Turbo RS
Past: 15 GT3, 17 R8 SC, Two 16 M4 GTS’s, Two 18 GT350R's, Two 13 RS5’s, 13 M3, 10 R8, 15 M4, 09 M3, 04 M3, 09 S5, 02 M3... It all started with an RX-7 (FD). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 02:12 PM | #4 | |
First Lieutenant
101
Rep 360
Posts |
Quote:
I guess time will tell... if sales for the next-gen M3 don't live up to expectations and Audi, Mercedes, Lexus, Caddy all continue to have success against the M3 then I wonder if BMW will bring the V8 back? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 02:31 PM | #5 |
Major General
4463
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Just curious how you'd explain the 911 Turbo or the GTR, both of which are faster than well, just about every naturally aspirated V8. Looking at only the straight line speed differential between the E60 and F10 M5's, I think any fear of the F8x cars being slow misplaced.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 02:53 PM | #6 |
First Lieutenant
14
Rep 300
Posts |
Audi is putting the 4.0T in the new S6 and S8.
edit - just read Audi's specs on the S8; 0-60 in 3.9 seconds and "top track speed" of 130mph. LOL. So, as soon as you pass through the 1/4 mile, you'll hit the governor. That's got to be a misprint.
__________________
| '13 328i M Sport - Estoril Blue | '12 300C SRT8 | '12 Wrangler Rubi Unlimited - COD MW3 Edition|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 03:02 PM | #7 | |
Major General
4463
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Quote:
Many non-sport package BMW's are governed to 130 too. It is odd that an Audi S is governed that low, but I bet it's due to the US tire choice. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 05:21 PM | #8 | |
Major General
3487
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
I think you are missing the point of the M3. The C63 for example has had more power than an M3 since it came out a number of years ago (4 years?) 6.2 litre engine vs a 4litre. C63 is such a tail happy car, not fast round a track, too much power. Unless the new M3/4 goes xDrive it doesn't need a Turbo V8 pushing out 500+ hp. A well sorted inline 6 Turbo will be fine |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 08:02 PM | #9 | |
I plead the 5th.
523
Rep 1,519
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
-Matt
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2012, 08:43 PM | #10 |
First Lieutenant
101
Rep 360
Posts |
I've owned the E92 335i & E92 M3 and there is just something about the V8 that puts a smile on my face every morning. Don't get me wrong, I loved the low-end torque of the 335i but after taking the M3 for a test drive I couldn't leave the showroom without purchasing it. Everyday when I get behind the wheels of the M3 I feel like it's xmas morning. I guess I'm just sad to see the V8 go.
Might have to seriously consider the RS5 when the time comes to trade the M3. I'm such a huge fan of BMW and have never been into the IS-F (fake tailpipes) or C63 (Merc still considered an old man's car), so the closest thing I can see to the M3 is the RS5. I've never owned a Detroit built car so the CTS-V is out of the question for me. But then all the alternatives (IS-F, RS5, C63) don't come in a traditional manual. Call me old fashion but I still prefer three pedals. Who am I kidding, I'm not going anywhere BMW somehow I have the feeling I'm going to love the F82 just as much, if not even more than the E92. All I ask is please don't take away my beloved 3rd pedal!!! |
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2012, 01:16 AM | #11 | |
Lieutenant General
609
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
Have a look here for some lap time comparisons. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2012, 07:51 AM | #12 |
First Lieutenant
14
Rep 300
Posts |
there's 200lbs difference between an M3 and C63 Coupe. Not much when you're talking about 400+ hp. The Benz needs bigger rubber in the rear...it's only got 255's on 9" wheels. My E550 Coupe had a 5.5L V8 and also had 255's in the rear and it needed more. 275's fit great on both cars on the stock 19x9's
__________________
| '13 328i M Sport - Estoril Blue | '12 300C SRT8 | '12 Wrangler Rubi Unlimited - COD MW3 Edition|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2012, 01:38 PM | #13 |
Private First Class
63
Rep 185
Posts |
If the production numbers of the M3 were was small as the RS5 and C63, maybe. I think BMW can't support another super high volume gas guzzler with the new EPA regulations. The RS5 and C63 are not as popular so they are free to be outliers.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2012, 06:57 AM | #14 | |
Major General
3487
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
The C63 is nose heavy and tail light, which makes it understeer on turn in, and wildy oversteer under power. With a good driver behind the wheel, the C63 can hustle. Put an average driver on track in a C63 and an M3 and you will get better times on M3. The M3's balance and idiot proof handling is much better than the C63. The M3 inspires confidence. C63 is a hoot to drive, shares in a tyre company help, and the raw V8 soundtrack is soooo much better than M3 (IMO of course) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2012, 02:55 AM | #15 |
Lieutenant
40
Rep 544
Posts
Drives: BMW 435i xDrive M-Sport
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal, QC
|
But that amazing V8 high-reving scream... You'll never get that from an I6. Yes, I consider sound as a highly important factor when I'll buy my next car.
And that just about does it for me... I'm going with the E92 V8 for my next car for a couple years and switch to the F82 when it'll be in its 3rd year od production. I have to experience the V8 while it still looks good on the streets! |
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2012, 01:15 PM | #16 | |
Lieutenant General
609
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
Fully agree on the second point as well. Cheers.
__________________
E92 M3 | Space Gray on Fox Red | M-DCT | CF Roof | RAC RG63 Wheels | Brembo 380mm BBK | | Vorsteiner Ti Exhaust | Matte Black Grilles/Side Gills/Rear Emblem/Mirrors | | Alekshop Back up Camera | GP Thunders | BMW Aluminum Pedals | Elite Angels | | XPEL Full Front Wrap | Hardwired V1 | Interior Xenon Light Kit | |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|