FS: ideal track square setup bimmerworld TA16 forged black 18x10.5 et27 square

[polarbearz]

https://www.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...php?p=31012816

This is the ideal squared setup for a forged wheel. +27 is okay to fit 295/30/18 200tw tires and my friends have done it before.

[drroc]

Originally Posted by polarbearz

https://www.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...php?p=31012816

This is the ideal squared setup for a forged wheel. +27 is okay to fit 295/30/18 200tw tires and my friends have done it before.

You should have posted last week before I made my order for TA5Rs and NT01s. Good luck with the sale.

[polarbearz]

Originally Posted by drroc

You should have posted last week before I made my order for TA5Rs and NT01s. Good luck with the sale.

thanks!

[M3SQRD]

10.5et27 is pretty aggressive for the rear of a f8x especially if you want to run a 295 rear tire. The ideal setup for a 10.5 square setup is 10.5et36. A 9 mm more aggressive offset means the wheel is another 0.35” outboard. Here’s a link to the 18” square setup thread showing many different 18x10.5 setups with 10.5et36 being the best square setup for running a 295 rear tire:

https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1555419

[polarbearz]

Originally Posted by M3SQRD

10.5et27 is pretty aggressive for the rear of a f8x especially if you want to run a 295 rear tire. The ideal setup for a 10.5 square setup is 10.5et36. A 9 mm more aggressive offset means the wheel is another 0.35” outboard. Here’s a link to the 18” square setup thread showing many different 18x10.5 setups with 10.5et36 being the best square setup for running a 295 rear tire:

https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1555419

My friend easily fit 295/30/18 with -2.3 camber in the rear on +27. +36 is not forged wheels. So TA16 is better.

[M3SQRD]

Originally Posted by polarbearz

My friend easily fit 295/30/18 with -2.3 camber in the rear on +27. +36 is not forged wheels. So TA16 is better.

lol…It has absolutely nothing to do with forged or flow formed. However, a flow-formed wheel with an appropriate offset is a better wheel than a forged wheel with an incorrect offset. You can claim the TA16 is a better wheel but that doesn’t make its offset ideal. If you’re advertising that a 295 easily fits then you should show installed pictures with a 295 (or even a 305 which supposedly fits too), not 275, tires.

[polarbearz]

Originally Posted by M3SQRD

lol…It has absolutely nothing to do with forged or flow formed. However, a flow-formed wheel with an appropriate offset is a better wheel than a forged wheel with an incorrect offset. You can claim the TA16 is a better wheel but that doesn’t make its offset ideal. If you’re advertising that a 295 easily fits then you should show installed pictures with a 295 (or even a 305 which supposedly fits too), not 275, tires.

18x10.5 et22 295 rt660. He didn’t max the camber yet. +27 has plenty of room.

I have seen a few m4 in the forum with +20/22 295/30/18. I remembered a white one with white wheels and aero. You should spent more time to do some research and stop claiming +27 as incorrect. If it fits and doesn’t rub, why is it incorrect? I know +36 might be better, but if they both fit, what’s the difference? I would choose forged over flow form if they both fit

[polarbearz]

Bump

[polarbearz]

Bump. Can ship to any state. Price includes shipping