04-26-2018, 07:18 AM | #2 |
Major
554
Rep 1,030
Posts |
All races had the guy in the alfa do the countdown giving him at least a one second advantage each time specially with the poor reaction time from the bimmer driver lol..
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2018, 09:02 AM | #3 |
General
21132
Rep 20,742
Posts
Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal
|
I saw that video on YouTubes a few days ago. I did not bother posting because it is completely pointless, the Alfa gets a jump on the M3 in every race. The races are not representative.
That being said, the Alfa is the faster car in a straight line, there is no disputing this. Albeit not by as much as what is shown in the video.
__________________
Porsche 911 turbo 2021 992 GT Silver
Previous cars: M4cs 2019 F82 Limerock Grey / M4 2015 F82 Silverstone / M3 2008 E92 Silverstone / M3 2002 E46 Carbon Black |
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2018, 09:57 AM | #4 | |
Banned
332
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
IMHO, which you obviously don't care about, the M3 is a better track oriented car, but the Quadrifoglio is without a doubt in my mind (and many car journalists) a better road car, but primarily because it is set up better for the road. It is fast, great handling, but most interestingly more compliant riding. The biggest draw for me was that it was different. Had the M3 for 2 years of blissful (overall) ownership, but that is pretty much the extent of my attention span for a car as I just enjoy trying new things. With that said, I have never "downgraded" when swapping rides. There always has to be some X factor that makes the new vehicle more interesting than the old ride. You guys are passionate about your M3s, and I get that, but you can't think there are not good and in some ways better alternatives. If I was primarily tracking a car, I'd get an M3 again too, but I am not any longer, so the Alfa is more interesting to me for my own personal reasons. I would never imply the M3 sucks, as many of you guys have about the Alfa. It saddens me that you guys are not open to trying and respecting other vehicles for what they are, even if you still prefer what you have. Lastly, even if I keep my Alfa longer-term than my normal 2 years, I may still search for good low mileage M4 convertible for Summer use. I always like to have a convertible option in the stable to thoroughly enjoy the short New England Summer weather on nice drives to Cape Cod. Though I doubt any of the above will resonate with you all, but hope you understand that I don't have any hard feelings despite the anti-Alfa hatred on these M3 vs Alfa threads. They are entertaining most of the time. Be well. P.S. that Alfa really whooped that ZCPs ass! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2018, 11:30 AM | #5 |
Major
254
Rep 1,391
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2018, 03:10 PM | #8 |
Major
1274
Rep 1,290
Posts |
The E9X and especially so the F8X are built to withstand the rigors of the most enthusiastic hobbyist track rat needs. No limp mode, no cooling issues, no little niggles that keep you away from putting in recurring laps under any condition. Just look at what the M engineers did - they put in a ton of work to deliver the goods.
Everything else in its class will simply end up limping including the Alfa. They're simply not engineered to handle the rigors of multi-lap adventures. For regular street use, pick the one that you think looks, feels and sounds best. In my world, M4 first and then maybe the C63S 2nd. I myself simply don't trust FIAT engineering. It's a bit of a veneer brand this Alfa. Subjectively, it looks like an angry bird. I park next to one at the gym sometimes and it's a bit of an aesthetic mess.
__________________
Dry sump flat six
Last edited by THEROK; 04-28-2018 at 08:25 PM.. |
Appreciate
2
CanAutM321131.50 KakashiSenpai461.00 |
04-27-2018, 07:54 PM | #9 | |||
General
21132
Rep 20,742
Posts
Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal
|
Not sure why you a directing this response at me, but...
Quote:
Quote:
I've called you a fanboy more than once because many of your comments, devoid of any sound rational or objectivity, fit the fanboy definition to a tee. Quote:
__________________
Porsche 911 turbo 2021 992 GT Silver
Previous cars: M4cs 2019 F82 Limerock Grey / M4 2015 F82 Silverstone / M3 2008 E92 Silverstone / M3 2002 E46 Carbon Black |
|||
Appreciate
3
|
04-28-2018, 06:57 AM | #10 |
Private
28
Rep 75
Posts |
well said.
__________________
2015 911 Carrera 4S 7MT 2018 911 GT3 6MT 2019 BMW M5 Comp |
Appreciate
0
|
05-02-2018, 01:42 PM | #11 | |
Lieutenant General
18871
Rep 14,141
Posts
Drives: G82 M4C X-Drive
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Orange County, CA
|
Quote:
__________________
2022 G82///M4 Competition X-Drive - KW-HAS, EBC Bluestuff, Millway Race Camber Plates, Cup2 Connect*, PSI High Flow Midpipe, Lightweight Front Lip, M Perf Flow Through Wing Previous • 2018 F80 ///M3 CS • 2016 F80 ///M3 IG: Raging_G82 |
|
Appreciate
1
KakashiSenpai461.00 |
05-02-2018, 02:07 PM | #12 | |
Brigadier General
1882
Rep 3,341
Posts |
Quote:
Being older, I have tried other flavors when comparos said they were better- B6 S4 C and D said was better than the E46 M3, and the W204 C63, because the last gen E92 was just too slow for my tastes. Good to have choices, but competition is not new- but for me, I think that bmw m3 formula worked best, high reving engine, manual/dct high performance tranny, and chassis balance. the m3 production cycle unfortunately is earlier than most competitors so most of the time the amg's, rs/s cars have a couple of years to benchmark the new gen and make tweaks to their cars.
__________________
Currently:
2018 GT3 2020 X3MC Previously: 1999 M3 2002 M3 2005 S4 2008 C63 2015 M3 2016 X5M 2019 911S |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-03-2018, 01:34 AM | #14 | |
Private First Class
109
Rep 127
Posts |
Quote:
here comes capt sav-a-hoe back to defend the honor of his precious alfa! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2018, 03:54 PM | #15 |
Banned
332
Rep 415
Posts |
Hey man, different strokes for different folks. Was very happy with my M3, but just as happy now with the Alfa, perhaps even more so, but these things are personal. You don’t have to want one to still appreciate them from afar. It’s not a zero sum game!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2018, 04:07 PM | #16 | |
Banned
332
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2018, 05:44 PM | #17 | |
Brigadier General
1882
Rep 3,341
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Currently:
2018 GT3 2020 X3MC Previously: 1999 M3 2002 M3 2005 S4 2008 C63 2015 M3 2016 X5M 2019 911S |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2018, 06:51 PM | #18 | |
Banned
332
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
Being an “M3 vs Alfa Quadrifoglio” thread, just sharing my own actual experience having owned both cars...even simultaneously. Sorry if it’s not consistent with what you hoped the message to be. Stated repeatedly, I like both cars, but actually like the Alfa a bit more. If I didn’t, I would not have purchased it ($$$)...and conversely, lease-assigned the M3 a year earlier than the actual lease termination date. Think about that. ZERO regrets, and have enjoyed every minute of my ownership experience. Just because I dumped my last M3 doesn’t mean I don’t have an appreciation for other BMWs and won’t buy yet another at some point. Conversely, I’d like to think you are seasoned enough car guys to appreciate different approaches to the same segment too. Am I giving you way too much credit? In the last 3 years, I’ve either bought for myself or negotiated for a significant other, an M3, M235i, M240i, X3, and X1. Obviously, I like the brand, just not every single thing, about every model, all the time. That’s objectivity, Dude. Last edited by mcc3456; 05-07-2018 at 06:58 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
jc05e46m3847.50 |
05-07-2018, 07:04 PM | #19 | |
Brigadier General
1882
Rep 3,341
Posts |
Quote:
I find that the Alfa is ugly, it was ugly when I saw it first and it is still ugly today. I don't want the zf tranny on a sports car. After driving PDK, and DCT, it is leagues above the zf8 torque converter. I find that Alfa, with more hp and torque, r comp tires, should be getting lap times much faster than the M3, instead the cars are close with the M being faster- I value track times more than straight line, I am buying a sports sedan, not a drag star. I find the reliability of the Alfa to be a problem. I don't dump cars every 2 years like you do, I like to learn the car's characteristics, which can take years, and I find my M3 rewarding me even today almost 4 years, 34k miles later. You speak about the comparison as a one size fits all. I like it better and owned both so I am right and your reasons to love the M is bunk. This is why I don't go on other forums to teach others about how great my choices were. People choose things for different reasons, I don't live their lives, and I sure as hell don't need to teach them anything.
__________________
Currently:
2018 GT3 2020 X3MC Previously: 1999 M3 2002 M3 2005 S4 2008 C63 2015 M3 2016 X5M 2019 911S |
|
Appreciate
1
KakashiSenpai461.00 |
05-07-2018, 07:56 PM | #20 |
Captain
175
Rep 646
Posts |
Hey mc3455, I am glad you are enjoying your ride and, as a car enthusiast, thanks for sharing your experience with the Alfa. It is a very nice vehicle and I would be just as happy having it parked in my garage as I am with the M3. It is a bit of a golden age for the motorcar and I suspect we will be the last generation to enjoy them. An automated electric pod will be in my future just in time for my dementia.
|
Appreciate
1
mcc3456332.00 |
05-07-2018, 08:16 PM | #21 | |
Banned
332
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
BTW...you guys are the one’s who keep creating multiple BMW M3 -vs- Alfa Quadrifoglio threads, not me. I’m just contributing some actual ownership experience (of both cars) to the conversation, but sadly, it’s almost always met with some sort of petulant commentary, along with obvious inaccuracies about “the competition”. Guess that qualifies as car enthusiast talk on here these days. Last edited by mcc3456; 05-07-2018 at 08:46 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2018, 08:23 PM | #22 | |
Banned
332
Rep 415
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|