07-22-2012, 08:21 AM | #23 |
Brigadier General
431
Rep 3,888
Posts |
The M4 renaming is a good move. The M3 must have a NA engine, but the next generation won't. So its time to close the M3 chapter and start a new one. M4 is the first step.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 08:26 AM | #24 |
4 Star General -Twilight Zone
36
Rep 1,032
Posts |
__________________
'12 Ducati Diavel
'06 E46 M3 (sold) | '97 325is - Dinan (sold) '02 Z3 3.0 coupe (sold) Past - '84 Ferrari 308 GTSI | '88 Ferrari 328 GTS | '05 Dodge Viper Copperhead Edition #180/300 | Audi S4 |
Appreciate
0
|
09-13-2015, 06:29 AM | #25 |
Second Lieutenant
126
Rep 258
Posts
Drives: 2016 F80 MG/SO
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
|
I enjoyed reading this 3 year old thread today, realizing how wrong some of these posters were about the market perception (and the possible demise?) of the M3 as a result of the introduction of the M4.
I think that today the M3 holds its own and is appealing to an important segment. I think BMW did a great job with this....ultimately proving the OP wrong in so many ways...
__________________
Current: 2016 F80 MG/SO MT
Previous: 2015 F30 IB/SB 335i AT |
Appreciate
3
|
09-13-2015, 07:35 AM | #26 | |
Advocatus Douchebagus. Sex Marxist.
2415
Rep 3,415
Posts
Drives: Lucy.
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
__________________
Drivin' Lucy
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|