Owner F80 M3 Dyno and Weight: Let the modding begin!

m5 guy · 06-20-2014, 07:16 PM

Everything is awesome!

JoeFromPA · 06-20-2014, 07:17 PM

Holy macaroni on that power. That is some really insane under-rating.

I'm truly surprised by the dyno results and quite pleased with the weight. I always wanted my F80 to rock in at in 3500 pounds and now I'm confident it will, even with a full tank of gas, given it's a stripper model

jc05e46m3 · 06-20-2014, 07:21 PM

Spacers look amazing, Brakes look HUGE. Car looks amazing. Can't wait for mine to come.

jc05e46m3 · 06-20-2014, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blipit_

That is not bad at all for stock 19in wheels.

So true. IIRC, these are lighter than the e92 ZCP wheels.

IMrMark · 06-20-2014, 09:04 PM

Beautiful! Can't wait to see what's in store

FogCityM3 · 06-20-2014, 09:39 PM

Wow, incredible power. This engine is HUGELY underrated compared to the S65 based on the E92 dynos performed by EAS.

hadoken · 06-20-2014, 10:55 PM

The car and color look amazing. I wished I stuck to my guns and picked YMB. But wifey shot me down and I settled with MG. The spacers really improved the stance. An inch drop up front would make it perfect. Great photos! It really showcases that German engineering.

Audio Fan · 06-20-2014, 11:18 PM

I'm not a dyno expert. Can someone that is weigh in on this test? These results seem like Christmas coming for several consecutive days.

CanAutM3 · 06-21-2014, 01:37 AM

for sharing all this.

The wheel weights were a nice touch.

Keep up the good work

4/3rds · 06-21-2014, 02:42 AM

Is it lowered? Where did you get the springs?

e39>all · 06-21-2014, 04:09 AM

Wow! Insane numbers!

Appreciate the your post/info OP. I sure hope all the cars come with this ecu lol. I didn't think I could get more excited about the new m3 than I already am....but that just happened

turbo8765 · 06-21-2014, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASAP

I wonder if anyone still cares to dispute dyno numbers on a dynojet. They are dead on with the other dyno. Awesome looking car and pics!

412 avg SAE over 3 runs

-20-25 because we all know the EAS dyno reads high

390 + 12% for DT loss = 436.8

Holding out for the more realistic Edmunds dyno.

Thanks for posting pics. Very nice.

Is there a single drain on the oil pan?

gthal · 06-21-2014, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo8765

412 avg SAE over 3 runs

-20-25 because we all know the EAS dyno reads high

390 + 12% for DT loss = 436.8

Holding out for the more realistic Edmunds dyno.

Thanks for posting pics. Very nice.

Is there a single drain on the oil pan?

So are we ignoring the other dynos that were almost the same result? Two of them I believe.

spool twice · 06-21-2014, 06:27 AM

great results and beautiful car! is it sitting on wheel spacers?

CanAutM3 · 06-21-2014, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4/3rds

Is it lowered? Where did you get the springs?

I think it is only on spacers (20mm).

CanAutM3 · 06-21-2014, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jc05e46m3

So true. IIRC, these are lighter than the e92 ZCP wheels.

IIRC, the E9X ZCP wheels were relatively heavy because they were cast.

CanAutM3 · 06-21-2014, 06:37 AM

Seems to me BMW ///M under-delivered on the weight

but over-delivered on the power

.

Auto · 06-21-2014, 07:14 AM

Great thread! Thanks!

ASAP · 06-21-2014, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo8765

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASAP

I wonder if anyone still cares to dispute dyno numbers on a dynojet. They are dead on with the other dyno. Awesome looking car and pics!

412 avg SAE over 3 runs

-20-25 because we all know the EAS dyno reads high

390 + 12% for DT loss = 436.8

Holding out for the more realistic Edmunds dyno.

Thanks for posting pics. Very nice.

Is there a single drain on the oil pan?

Except STD is more common and is what is typically used. Assume 10-15 high and we are at 410-415 whp which backs up the 118 traps.

jc05e46m3 · 06-21-2014, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASAP

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo8765

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASAP

I wonder if anyone still cares to dispute dyno numbers on a dynojet. They are dead on with the other dyno. Awesome looking car and pics!

412 avg SAE over 3 runs

-20-25 because we all know the EAS dyno reads high

390 + 12% for DT loss = 436.8

Holding out for the more realistic Edmunds dyno.

Thanks for posting pics. Very nice.

Is there a single drain on the oil pan?

Except STD is more common and is what is typically used. Assume 10-15 high and we are at 410-415 whp which backs up the 118 traps.

Either way, still making significantly more than rated and we made out

spool twice · 06-21-2014, 08:28 AM

seems like a manual m4 would dip into 34xx lbs then, no?

Black Gold · 06-21-2014, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo8765

412 avg SAE over 3 runs

-20-25 because we all know the EAS dyno reads high

390 + 12% for DT loss = 436.8

Holding out for the more realistic Edmunds dyno.

Thanks for posting pics. Very nice.

Is there a single drain on the oil pan?

I'm a little confused by your math

An e9x makes 350-360 whp on this same dyno. If you subtract 15-20 hp from that, you are at 340 whp.

340 + 12% for dt loss is 380.8.

So, either your drivetrain loss numbers are way off or you are saying the e9x is massively overrated since it's claimed 414 hp.

Either way, I think your numbers and calculations are off.

The most relevent numbers are that this car makes approximately 50-60 whp more than the highest reading e9x m3s on this same dyno.

06-20-2014, 07:16 PM	#23
m5 guy Brigadier General 1692 Rep 3,200 Posts Drives: 2020 M5 Comp Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Hawaii iTrader: (14)	Everything is awesome! __________________ 2020 F90 M5 Comp Oxford Green Metallic II-Aragon JOURNAL 2016 F10 M5 Space Gray-Black SOLD 2012 E70 X5M Monte Carlo Blue-Silverstone SOLD 2001 E46 M3 Oxford Green Metallic II-Cinnamon SOLD
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-20-2014, 07:17 PM	#24
JoeFromPA Colonel 1796 Rep 2,997 Posts Drives: '15 AW M3 6MT Stripper Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: SE PA iTrader: (0)	Holy macaroni on that power. That is some really insane under-rating. I'm truly surprised by the dyno results and quite pleased with the weight. I always wanted my F80 to rock in at in 3500 pounds and now I'm confident it will, even with a full tank of gas, given it's a stripper model
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-20-2014, 07:21 PM	#25
jc05e46m3 Brigadier General 848 Rep 3,249 Posts Drives: '21 F90 M5 Comp Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Everywhere. iTrader: (3)	Spacers look amazing, Brakes look HUGE. Car looks amazing. Can't wait for mine to come. __________________ '21 /// M5 Comp - Frozen Brilliant White/Black '18 Porsche GT3 Carrara White/Black/Red - Sold '18 /// M3 - Individual Imola/Black - Sold '15 /// M4 - YMB/SO - Sold '12 E92 ///M3 ZCP - AW/FR - Sold
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-20-2014, 09:04 PM	#27
IMrMark Captain 75 Rep 991 Posts Drives: 2015 BMW M4 Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Fairfax, VA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2015 BMW M4 [9.66]	Beautiful! Can't wait to see what's in store
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-20-2014, 09:39 PM	#28
FogCityM3 Colonel 499 Rep 2,400 Posts Drives: M3 (E90) & Porsche GT3 RS Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: San Francisco iTrader: (0)	Wow, incredible power. This engine is HUGELY underrated compared to the S65 based on the E92 dynos performed by EAS.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-20-2014, 10:55 PM	#29
hadoken Enlisted Member 3 Rep 42 Posts Drives: F30 335i xDrive, F82 M4 Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Philly iTrader: (0)	The car and color look amazing. I wished I stuck to my guns and picked YMB. But wifey shot me down and I settled with MG. The spacers really improved the stance. An inch drop up front would make it perfect. Great photos! It really showcases that German engineering. __________________ 2015 F82 M4 2014 F30 335i xDrive 2012 Tundra 5.7L 2004 S2000
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-20-2014, 11:18 PM	#30
Audio Fan Major 778 Rep 1,058 Posts Drives: AY - M4 Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: NC iTrader: (0)	I'm not a dyno expert. Can someone that is weigh in on this test? These results seem like Christmas coming for several consecutive days.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-21-2014, 01:37 AM	#31
CanAutM3 General 21117 Rep 20,741 Posts Drives: 2021 911 turbo Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Montreal iTrader: (1) Garage List 2022 Audi RS6 [10.00] 2021 Porsche 911 turbo [10.00]	for sharing all this. The wheel weights were a nice touch. Keep up the good work
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-21-2014, 02:42 AM	#32
4/3rds Lieutenant 21 Rep 496 Posts Drives: 2015 BMW M4 (transporting) Join Date: May 2014 Location: Oklahoma iTrader: (1) Garage List 2015 BMW M4 (transp ... [0.00]	Is it lowered? Where did you get the springs?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-21-2014, 04:09 AM	#33
e39>all Second Lieutenant 3 Rep 228 Posts Drives: 09 335i sedan Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: TX iTrader: (0)	Wow! Insane numbers! Appreciate the your post/info OP. I sure hope all the cars come with this ecu lol. I didn't think I could get more excited about the new m3 than I already am....but that just happened
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-21-2014, 06:27 AM	#36
spool twice Rainbow Racer 1008 Rep 2,539 Posts Drives: BMW M4cs Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Tampa Bay, FL Area iTrader: (7) Garage List 2019 M4cs [0.00]	great results and beautiful car! is it sitting on wheel spacers?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-21-2014, 06:37 AM	#39
CanAutM3 General 21117 Rep 20,741 Posts Drives: 2021 911 turbo Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Montreal iTrader: (1) Garage List 2022 Audi RS6 [10.00] 2021 Porsche 911 turbo [10.00]	Seems to me BMW ///M under-delivered on the weight but over-delivered on the power .
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-21-2014, 07:14 AM	#40
Auto Captain 171 Rep 714 Posts Drives: MB CLS 63 AMG Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Sweden iTrader: (0)	Great thread! Thanks!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

06-21-2014, 08:28 AM	#43
spool twice Rainbow Racer 1008 Rep 2,539 Posts Drives: BMW M4cs Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Tampa Bay, FL Area iTrader: (7) Garage List 2019 M4cs [0.00]	seems like a manual m4 would dip into 34xx lbs then, no?
	Appreciate 0 Quote