F80 M3 VBOX Acceleration Results: 4.2s 0-100kmh / 0-62mph

SamS · 05-11-2014, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uae247

Not bad at all
Given I had a child seat, one gym bag, one laptop bag, one camera bag and tripod in the trunk.

And
it was 27 degrees outside, CELSIUS

Can you post a pic of your car seat installation? Apologies if you posted before, it's hard to keep up with this thread!

JDUni1 · 05-11-2014, 05:00 PM

I get 430 WHP and 467 crank HP for what it's worth (based on #s from previous posts)

gmd2003 · 05-11-2014, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASAP

Quote:

Originally Posted by gmd2003

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kadema

Quote:

Originally Posted by gmd2003

It's actually 118.9 mph

. Which on the drag strip because you act the last 60ft would be around 116mph . The 121 traps you quoted are from the strip or avg last 60 ft speeds from mags not raw GPS data . The 60-130 mph is >10 sec so it's over 1 sec slower than a standard M5 at those speeds ( the fastest stock 60-130 m5 time we've seen is high 8.6 . It gets to 200 km/hr which is a little over 124 mph in 13.x seconds . My M6 CP did 0-130 mph in 12.x seconds and 8.19 60-130 mph stock so it's about 2 sec off my car in both respects . ( that's a lot , and puts to rest any is it faster than an M5/6 talk ) . It also is clearly faster than an E92 M3 in both trap and 60-130mph so we can put that to rest too .

191.5 km/h is 118.9925833134 mph, so it's more like 119.0 than 118.9 mph.

And my stock M6 was 127.485 mph . It's fast but 8.5 mph trap difference is bus lengths from a roll .

Yep... 8 mph is massive... the M5/m6 would run away, I guarantee it but only fools didnt see it that way.

And my m6 CP did 17.3 sec 0-250 km/hr vs the M3's 23 sec . I think we can put the equal at 1000m thing to rest too

bimmerj · 05-11-2014, 05:25 PM

Sounds really good. Acceleration wise, not in the same league as the M5/6. If I recall, some of you put it in Porsche turbo territory from the numbers.

Np2014 · 05-11-2014, 05:58 PM

I wonder how a dinan engine chip or piggy back chip will change the time numbers. For example how would an extra 50 hp and extra 50 lbs of torque change the times? Or an extra 100 hp or 100 lbs of torque change the numbers?

elitex · 05-11-2014, 06:15 PM

some silly people thought it will be faster than an M5/M6. LOL!

john08135i · 05-11-2014, 06:18 PM

It must be nice to be rich... while here in the US we have to pay $4.50 per gallon for fuel.

Johnmd · 05-11-2014, 06:29 PM

Are there any F10 M5 comp package Vbox results anywhere on the forum

bimmerj · 05-11-2014, 06:37 PM

The laws state, that an M cannot be faster than an AMG in a straight line. By these same laws, an M3/4 cannot be faster than an M5/6 in a straight line

.

JDUni1 · 05-11-2014, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnmd

Are there any F10 M5 comp package Vbox results anywhere on the forum

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=888938

Johnmd · 05-11-2014, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JDUni1

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=888938

I saw that but thats not competition package. The extra 15hp and the longer power band makes a difference in all these times.

JDUni1 · 05-11-2014, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnmd

I saw that but thats not competition package. The extra 15hp and the longer power band makes a difference in all these times.

Different power to weight ratios, so not really and accurate comparison....

IMrMark · 05-11-2014, 07:23 PM

Oh no, it's a couple seconds slower in less than ideal conditions to an even more expensive version of an even more expensive car that I didn't want in the firstplace! Wait, I don't care

i'm happy with what I'm buying, you guys be happy with what you've bought, live let live etc etc etc big happy BMW community

Thanks uae... This is awesome data. I'm glad things are looking so good!!!

Imola3 · 05-11-2014, 07:24 PM

can anyone provide 991 Carrera S sats for sake of comparison?

Johnmd · 05-11-2014, 07:38 PM

So the car must be making around 455-460hp crank. A little underrated by 8-9%, not as much as the 13-14% difference we have seen in the m5/m6. But still extra hp is extra hp

TunedM2C · 05-11-2014, 07:46 PM

Great data for us to dissect. Any chance you can hit that dyno down the street from you in the (very) near future? Hell, give us the name and number of the joint and we'll pitch in for the appointment!

elitex · 05-11-2014, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bimmerj

The laws state, that an M cannot be faster than an AMG in a straight line. By these same laws, an M3/4 cannot be faster than an M5/6 in a straight line

.

LOL! 2wd E63s is slower than an M5. M5 is faster than AWD E63s in a roll race.

Needsdecaf · 05-11-2014, 07:53 PM

100kmh= 62 mph. Hot, dusty road, he did a repeatable 4.2. Which means heas already at 4.1 or 4.0 to 60 MPH. Get some better traction and cooler temps and this is a 3.8 sec car.

I would love to see 50 kmh to 150 kmh from a roll. And 10 kmh rolling "street start".

bimmerj · 05-11-2014, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elitex

LOL! 2wd E63s is slower than an M5. M5 is faster than AWD E63s in a roll race.

I think you are correct. Damn these laws.

clar · 05-11-2014, 08:02 PM

Of course it has to be slower than the M5/M6 by some margin. How else are they gonna offer a comp package next year? They will probably slap on 20-30 bhp in the upcoming comp pack and still maintain some distance with its more expensive sibling.

ake · 05-11-2014, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john08135i

It must be nice to be rich... while here in the US we have to pay $4.50 per gallon for fuel.

Oh c'mon. Stop whining please... you know how cheap the fuel is here in the States? Go to Europe and you'll be

I'll pay about 1.70 Euro per liter when I take the car back... that is ~$8.80 per gallon.

Needsdecaf · 05-11-2014, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ake

Quote:

Originally Posted by john08135i

It must be nice to be rich... while here in the US we have to pay $4.50 per gallon for fuel.

Oh c'mon. Stop whining please... you know how cheap the fuel is here in the States? Go to Europe and you'll be

I'll pay about 1.70 Euro per liter when I take the car back... that is ~$8.80 per gallon.

Not to mention what we pay for the cars in the base case. 1/3 to 1/2 or even 1/4.

05-11-2014, 05:00 PM	#24
JDUni1 Lieutenant 76 Rep 521 Posts Drives: '15 M3, '12 135i (Sold) Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Tucson, AZ iTrader: (0)	I get 430 WHP and 467 crank HP for what it's worth (based on #s from previous posts) __________________ 2015 Alpine White ///M3 \| Sakhir Orange/Black Extended Merino Leather \| 6MT \| Lighting Package \| Harmon Kardon \| H&R Sport Springs (F32) \| iND Cosmetic Treatment \| M Performance Spoiler \| 19" HRE 301M Frozen Red\| Mode Carbon Trophy R1 Diffuser
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 05:25 PM	#26
bimmerj Captain 146 Rep 795 Posts Drives: cars Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Canada iTrader: (0)	Sounds really good. Acceleration wise, not in the same league as the M5/6. If I recall, some of you put it in Porsche turbo territory from the numbers.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 05:58 PM	#27
Np2014 Second Lieutenant 137 Rep 238 Posts Drives: M4 Bsm/Sb Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Ohio iTrader: (0)	I wonder how a dinan engine chip or piggy back chip will change the time numbers. For example how would an extra 50 hp and extra 50 lbs of torque change the times? Or an extra 100 hp or 100 lbs of torque change the numbers?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 06:15 PM	#28
elitex . 1231 Rep 1,918 Posts Drives: 22 M8C Coupe, 21 X5MC Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Atlanta iTrader: (0) Garage List 2020 Mercedes C63S ... [0.00] 2021 X5M Competition [0.00]	some silly people thought it will be faster than an M5/M6. LOL! __________________ Previous 21 X5M MBB, 20 Evora GT, 20 C63S Coupe,19 X5 50i, 18 Giulia QV, 18 M5, 17 Evora 400, 18 LX570, 17 GT350,18 M4 Comp,17 R8 V10 ,17 M3 Comp,17 GT350,16 Escalade Plat ESV, 16 570S,16 911 GTS,15 M5, 15 LX570, 13 M5,13 Viper,14 Cayman S,13 M3,13 S4,10 RX8,12 A4,10 G37, 04 Mini Cooper S, 08 Scion TC, 06 Altima V6, 05 Altima, 01 Altima, 00 Altima, 94 Explorer, 92 Toyota Pickup, 98 Altima
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 06:18 PM	#29
john08135i Major 77 Rep 1,027 Posts Drives: 2013 M Sport, 2010 bmw S1000RR Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Orlando iTrader: (0)	It must be nice to be rich... while here in the US we have to pay $4.50 per gallon for fuel. __________________ M Sport Line Estoril Blue
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 06:29 PM	#30
Johnmd Banned 1 Rep 61 Posts Drives: CLS AMG Join Date: May 2014 Location: NJ iTrader: (0)	Are there any F10 M5 comp package Vbox results anywhere on the forum
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 06:37 PM	#31
bimmerj Captain 146 Rep 795 Posts Drives: cars Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Canada iTrader: (0)	The laws state, that an M cannot be faster than an AMG in a straight line. By these same laws, an M3/4 cannot be faster than an M5/6 in a straight line .
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 07:23 PM	#35
IMrMark Captain 75 Rep 991 Posts Drives: 2015 BMW M4 Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Fairfax, VA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2015 BMW M4 [9.66]	Oh no, it's a couple seconds slower in less than ideal conditions to an even more expensive version of an even more expensive car that I didn't want in the firstplace! Wait, I don't care i'm happy with what I'm buying, you guys be happy with what you've bought, live let live etc etc etc big happy BMW community Thanks uae... This is awesome data. I'm glad things are looking so good!!! __________________ 2015 ///M4 F82 [ Mineral Grey \| SO Ext \| 19" Black \| 6MT \| CFRP Interior \| LED \| Executive \| Side/Top Cameras \| Adaptive M Suspension \| HK Surround ] :: will code locally for rum, beer, or chicken; PM as desired :: Instagram: IMrMark
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 07:24 PM	#36
Imola3 Second Lieutenant 324 Rep 237 Posts Drives: Mk.7 Golf R Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Miami iTrader: (0)	can anyone provide 991 Carrera S sats for sake of comparison?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 07:38 PM	#37
Johnmd Banned 1 Rep 61 Posts Drives: CLS AMG Join Date: May 2014 Location: NJ iTrader: (0)	So the car must be making around 455-460hp crank. A little underrated by 8-9%, not as much as the 13-14% difference we have seen in the m5/m6. But still extra hp is extra hp
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 07:46 PM	#38
TunedM2C Brigadier General 828 Rep 4,190 Posts Drives: 2016 LBB M2 Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Earth iTrader: (2)	Great data for us to dissect. Any chance you can hit that dyno down the street from you in the (very) near future? Hell, give us the name and number of the joint and we'll pitch in for the appointment!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 07:53 PM	#40
Needsdecaf Major General 6513 Rep 6,659 Posts Drives: 2024 G80 Comp xDrive Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: The Woodlands, TX iTrader: (0)	100kmh= 62 mph. Hot, dusty road, he did a repeatable 4.2. Which means heas already at 4.1 or 4.0 to 60 MPH. Get some better traction and cooler temps and this is a 3.8 sec car. I would love to see 50 kmh to 150 kmh from a roll. And 10 kmh rolling "street start".
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-11-2014, 08:02 PM	#42
clar Major 144 Rep 1,440 Posts Drives: M5 Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Singapore iTrader: (0)	Of course it has to be slower than the M5/M6 by some margin. How else are they gonna offer a comp package next year? They will probably slap on 20-30 bhp in the upcoming comp pack and still maintain some distance with its more expensive sibling. __________________ - Frozen Grey F10 M5 DCT - Rosso Corsa 458 Speciale Sold - Frozen Grey E92 M3 Sold
	Appreciate 0 Quote