|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-16-2014, 11:12 AM | #23 |
Observer
6
Rep 38
Posts |
I'm not the surprised at the comment. My F10 M5 is an absolute handful to drive with DSC off and it will get your attention in MDM. While it is lots of fun to mash the throtle and feel the rear end fish tail around when going straight, my sense of self-preservation has prevented me from trying to do that in a curve. I would expect the M4 to demand at least as much respect from its drivers.
__________________
2013 BMW F10 M5
2012 BMW R1200GS 1994 Porsche 964 TL Former Bimmers: E90 M3 6 Speed; E46 M3; E36 M Roadster; E34 535i |
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 11:13 AM | #24 | |
Colonel
1795
Rep 2,997
Posts |
Quote:
It was a mistake. I am very lucky to have not torn up the car - I basically did a 180 and then continued spinning backwards as I slid into thick muddy soil which effectively slowed me down with no damage. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 11:26 AM | #26 | |
Private First Class
9
Rep 176
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 11:34 AM | #27 |
First Lieutenant
74
Rep 348
Posts |
Everyone likes the idea of lighter cars, but lighter cars spin more easily. They spin less spectacularly than if you lose a heavy car, but they spin more often. Audi has a good thing going where I can be full throttle at the apex because of the quattro and the active sports differential. Try that in an M3 and you're going backwards into a wall.
One of the safer cars I've ridden in at the track is the Audi A3 VR6, which is basically a front wheel drive car with an open diff (and some haldex AWD that occasionally sends power to the rear). It basically slipped through every turn. You could be full throttle every turn and it would just slip a wheel if you sent too much torque down.
__________________
WTB: 2016 M3 sedan, Black Sapphire, Extended Sakhir Lether, Ceramic Brakes, 19" black wheels, Lighting Package, HK sound, USB/Bluetooth
Sold: 2006 e90 325i 6MT, ground control coilovers, Remus exhaust |
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 11:50 AM | #29 |
Major
238
Rep 1,022
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 11:56 AM | #30 | |
First Lieutenant
74
Rep 348
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
WTB: 2016 M3 sedan, Black Sapphire, Extended Sakhir Lether, Ceramic Brakes, 19" black wheels, Lighting Package, HK sound, USB/Bluetooth
Sold: 2006 e90 325i 6MT, ground control coilovers, Remus exhaust |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 12:08 PM | #31 |
Private
69
Rep 91
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 12:12 PM | #32 |
Colonel
1795
Rep 2,997
Posts |
AWD allows you to basically go full throttle whenever the heck you want and, assuming you aren't too hot already, you are fine. AWD and mid-engine cars are very user friendly in that regard.
In regards to lighter cars being more easy to spin, I completely disagree. They have far less inertia so it is far easier to reign them back in once control is lost. I recently had an incredibly important lesson in vehicle weight importance. I know it's not track driving, but here's my story: I had my 2007 vw touareg v10 tdi, a 6000 pound vehicle, loaded up with 3 adult passengers and my son in a car seat. Probably 7000 total loaded pounds in the vehicle. I hit a patch of ice on a MINOR downhill going about 10mph. I hit my brakes. The slide was just ridiculous. I'm used to 3500-3900 pound vehicles losing traction and the level of control you have at those weights and relative inertia. You hit ice in a 3500 pound vehicle at 10mph, you slide let's say 50 feet between friction slows you enough for your tires to grab again. When I hit that ice in my 6000lb vehicle at 10mph, I slid about 125 feet. The only thing I accomplished with my efforts was turning the front of the vehicle to an angle in case I was t-boned (I slid into a busy intersection). ... I share this because the importance of low weight is so critical to regaining control once it is lost. Yes, given an equal contact patch a lower weight vehicle will exert less friction on a given surface. But once that contact patch loses traction, a lower weight vehicle will much more easily regain traction than the same heavier vehicle in the same situation. That's because it requires less friction to take control of the lighter vehicle. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 01:17 PM | #33 | |
Brigadier General
670
Rep 4,959
Posts |
Quote:
Whenever you get a quote from a manufacturer employee, it would be smart to digest the content of it with a grain of salt. However, if there is some truth to the fact that the new F80 M3 is a pure driver's car that rewards driving talent, that is very exciting for all of the enthusiasts here. Even if the quote was a bit over the top (i.e., that it was mostly marketing hype), it's refreshing that BMW M is genuinely excited about what it has accomplished/achieved with this new M3, the flagship of the M brand. This community is full of excellent, safe drivers that enjoy the full performance of their cars responsibly on the track. We'll get a better sense of what kind of car the F80 M3 is after some of us here get a chance to drive it. I can't wait to read the opinions and comparisons from current/former E9X M3 drivers after they get a crack at thrashing the F80. We're fortunate to have many objective-minded members that really know their stuff when it comes to "performance" cars. And regarding the C63, I'll shoot you a PM here soon. In the meantime, I can say that there were certain attributes/characteristics that got me very excited about the W204 C63. At this point, all indications point to the F80 M3 having the same or similar attributes/characteristics. Consequently, if I like what I experience when I finally get some seat time with it, I wouldn't hesitate to pick one up after my W204 is gone.
__________________
Current: '23 G20 M Sport 330i
Current: '20 X253 GLC300 SUV Gone: '20 W205 C43 Sedan Gone: '18 W205 C43 Sedan Gone: '13 W204 C63 Sedan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 03:25 PM | #34 |
Lieutenant General
1138
Rep 12,444
Posts |
This makes me want to drive one even more.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 03:26 PM | #35 | |
Apex Everything!
976
Rep 4,378
Posts
Drives: 2007 Honda S2000, 2017 GT350
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cedar Park, TX
|
Quote:
__________________
2011 E92 M3(Sold). 2007 Honda S2000 (Track Car). 2016 Cayman GT4 (Sold). 2017 Shelby GT350 (AKA Crowd Killer).
My pet project: https://stickershift.com |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 03:36 PM | #37 |
European Editor
10539
Rep 22,992
Posts |
EXACTLY what I was thinking.
Now we shall see if BMW's lawyers will tune the DSC to the same slip angle specs as say what the EU market gets. Me thinks not. (just like the e9x models)
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 03:41 PM | #38 |
Brigadier General
670
Rep 4,959
Posts |
Precisely my thoughts after I read the quote. Regardless of whether it is partially marketing hype, it is very encouraging and exactly the sort of thing M drivers want to hear: that the car rewards meticulous, technically sound driving.
__________________
Current: '23 G20 M Sport 330i
Current: '20 X253 GLC300 SUV Gone: '20 W205 C43 Sedan Gone: '18 W205 C43 Sedan Gone: '13 W204 C63 Sedan |
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 03:44 PM | #39 | |
Colonel
190
Rep 2,431
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
F80 m3, 997 gt3, 14 ram ctd, f15 x5, drz400sm Gone:z4m, boss 302, c6 z06, m6,z3m |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 03:44 PM | #40 |
Captain
157
Rep 837
Posts |
Haha. Didn't you know Bruno Spengler started out as BMW's janitor? Racing skills as soon as he got his employee ID card... with full dental and 401k, made him a RACING GOD!!
__________________
2003 Cobra -> 2010 BMW e90 M3 - Space Grey - Black on Carbon Leather Int. - BRILLIANT CAR!! |
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 03:48 PM | #41 |
Lieutenant General
4972
Rep 10,200
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 2022 718 Spyder
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
When will the magazines/online rags start getting their own drives in the M3/4??
__________________
Past rides: 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 03:50 PM | #42 | |
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
The turbo motor characteristics are going to simply catch many drivers off guard. The 1M is without a doubt a difficult car to keep up with when all nannies off. The STIG ended up in the weeds once when turning in a hot lap for TOP GEAR. The simple fact is that TONS of torque ( more than a wimpy E9x M3 V8 hehehehehe) and then even over-boost make power delivery challenging. It's harder to achieve the same lap time as the e 9x M3 although the cars are very much equal and have the same suspension. The shorter wheelbase in the 1m is also a factor. The other thing is how much mechanical grip is available. The 1M has crazy grip. But when it lets go.... It lets go! It takes fast hands a good driver to recover. However, a more challenging car can also be entertaining. It's raw and sometimes unpredictable and drivers may call the car more a " drivers car" than something that simply tracks well and turns well and doesn't ever get the heart racing.... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 03:54 PM | #43 | |
Banned
7906
Rep 11,785
Posts |
Quote:
I am seriously considering this for my car, if but to only remove the corner brake control. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2014, 04:10 PM | #44 |
Captain
239
Rep 714
Posts |
Not to beat a dead horse but It goes back to that old saying, Opinions are like butt-holes and everyone has one.
You ingest that tid-bit of knowledge and perspective. Later on use it for your assessment and of course whatever perspective deltas you may have.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|