05-20-2011, 08:58 AM | #133 | ||
Moderator
7525
Rep 19,368
Posts |
I think you must have mean S65 there, yeah? I am pretty sure that the S63 is a lot heavier than an S54 (and by extension, S65) due to all the turbo infrastructure.
Quote:
Quote:
See above. The iron block is one big disadvantage of that solution. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 09:14 AM | #135 | ||
Moderator
7525
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Still, that hardly leaves "a little suspension" as the only difference between an M3 and a 3 series. The improvements made to the car to go from 3 to M3 are numerous and significant. I'd suggest a little research - it will be enlightening. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 09:18 AM | #136 | |
Lieutenant
26
Rep 580
Posts |
Quote:
I do kind of care because I love seeing ///Motorsport tech in street cars, but in the end, I have to admit that you're right. I would be fine even if the next M3 is a hybrid with a CVT as long at it is fast, light and handles. You have to ask youself what is most important -- performance or something else. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 09:24 AM | #137 |
New Member
0
Rep 14
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 09:25 AM | #138 |
Banned
61
Rep 908
Posts
Drives: em-funf
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2000 E39 M5 - current [0.00]
2007 E92 335i - SOLD [0.00] 1996 E36 M3-SOLD [0.00] 2000 E39 M5-SOLD [0.00] 2001 E46 M3-SOLD [0.00] 1995 E36 M3-SOLD [0.00] |
no turbo mambo jumbo
M3 should always be N/A. throttle response of FI cars will always be inferior. i say go back to I6, 9k rpm and 380hp in lighter, say 3100lb chassis. all else is garbage. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 09:38 AM | #139 | |
Lieutenant
106
Rep 585
Posts |
Quote:
BUT ... Why are you so sure that the M3 is not getting an V6 and an N54/55 based I6 instead? Have you better inside informations? Why do you think that the M-GmbH is not able to change their mind ... its 100% clear that in the begining the N54/55 based I6 was the absolut favored engine choise ... but at that time cost reduction is the overall/only thinking that was possible ... but if you take a look at cars like the upcoming M3 EVO and M3 CSL, it looks like the M Spirit is back again ... and an unique engine design was one off the M roots ... and an V6 derivate of the S63 and an S65 BiTurbo are the only engines that could fullfil this sprit. Greets Uli_HH |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 09:41 AM | #140 | |
Brigadier General
236
Rep 3,303
Posts |
Quote:
Cheers, e46e92
__________________
"...it's not about the money and not about the brand of the car, it's about handling,performance and passion......And that, no other car has all together like an M3........when you talk about the most complete car the M is invincible." --Tony Kanaan. Last edited by e46e92love; 05-20-2011 at 10:10 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 09:46 AM | #141 |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
Get ready for tri-turbo V6.
These news, and yesterday's track day makes me feel so good about my M3.
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 10:42 AM | #142 | |
Major
197
Rep 1,278
Posts |
Quote:
Jesus. If they bi-turbo the S65, as it's already a very efficient engine... If they are replacing the internals, I'd guess somewhere ~425hp/400tq. I'm not getting my hopes up, though.
__________________
PAST 2007 Black Sapphire E90 335i, 2010 Jerez Black E92 M3, 2012 Mineral White E92 M3, 2013 Singapore Grey F10 M5, 2016 Azurite Black F80 M3,
CURRENT 2017 Oxford White GT350 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 10:54 AM | #143 |
Captain
116
Rep 888
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 10:58 AM | #144 |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
That's no surprise though, because S54 is very heavy. And this is kind of a tricky marketing on BMW side. Without mentioning that S54 was very heavy for it's size, they make it sound like they made a very light V8.
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:02 AM | #145 |
Private First Class
5
Rep 115
Posts
Drives: 2011 BMW 328i xDrive 6MT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canton, MA
|
M3 I6
I'd have to go with a twin turbo version of the next gen turbo I6. Put this in a lighter chassis, which they will since the CFRP will be more readily available for body panel switches going from F3x to the M3. I can't even imagine a V6- absolute BMW sacrilege.
Luxury goodies won't be going anywhere since so many want them. Ad long as the brunt of them are optional, what's the issue? Weight has creeped upwards for safety and features and size. I believe we are witnessing the plateau and next the reduction as lightweight technologies improve and costs associated with them decrease. Also, for an M-specific engine, they could bore it out a bit for more displacement. We know the mass produced engines will be in 0.5L cylinders, but M could and should be able to modify that for their purposes. Let's just hope the feeling full hydraulic steering rack makes it into the next M3....
__________________
-'11 BMW 328i xDrive (E90): Titanium Silver, Black, 6MT!!; 7/19-
-'21 BMW X7 xDrive40i (G07): Black Saphire, Beige; 4/21- -'20 BMW X5 xDrive40i (G05): Black Saphire, Black; 11/22- -'12 BMW 328i (E91): Tasman Green, Oyster, 6AT; 6/12-4/17 -'04 MINI Cooper (R50): Indi Blue w/White Top, Black, 5MT; 1/04- |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:11 AM | #147 | ||
Major General
684
Rep 5,069
Posts
Drives: BMW 230i Msport w/LSD
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Astral Projecting: ∞ 23.516 -122 02.625 0242.101 ĕv'rē-hwâr'
iTrader: (16)
Garage List 2009 Porsche 911 997.2 [10.00]
2019 Hyundai N (Sold) [10.00] 2013 BMW M3 (Sold) [10.00] 2011 1M Coupe (Sold) [8.78] 2008 E90 M3 (Sold) [8.60] 2007 Z4 Mcpe (Sold) [9.50] 2005 BMW M3 (Sold) [10.00] |
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:16 AM | #148 | |
Moderator
7525
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
For me, it does not stand to reason that BMW will develop a brand new engine configuration for an M3/X3M/M4/X4M/Z4M when they did not go that route for the M5/X5M/M6/X6M. I acknowledge that sometimes things don't fall into place nicely and you have to invest more money to get results. The S65 and S85 were born from that type of need. But in the end, they've made the N63 work as the basis for an engine to power the latest generation of large M vehicles, and I have not heard a single compelling piece of information that leads me to believe that they cannot make the N54/N55 work as the basis for an engine to power the upcoming medium-sized M vehicles. "Whenever possible, substitute constructions out of known entities for inferences to unknown entities" - Bertrand Russell (Ok, so someone with a philosophy degree can go ahead and call me out for misuing that quote if I have - I can take it. ) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:18 AM | #149 |
Moderator
7525
Rep 19,368
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 11:33 AM | #150 | |
Moderator
7525
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
The S63 or S65-turbo solutions have this same disadvantage. Either one will mean gaining engine weight vs. the current setup. An N54 or N55, on the other hand, weighs less than an S65. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 01:10 PM | #152 |
Captain
116
Rep 888
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 02:36 PM | #153 |
New Member
0
Rep 13
Posts |
Rumor: BMW Testing Four Engine Configurations for Next F30/F32 M3
How is everyone? The F3X M3 is going to be a V6 turbo motor! Not only because BMW have themselves announced this but by comparing how the S65 was previously engineered to be very much alike the V10 which has now been discontinued…. V8/V10 engines that have high revving natural aspiration.
The new F10 M5 engine has a reverse port flow bi-turbo engine. It has taken time to engineer this because a twin-power turbo X5M/X6M engine cannot be attached by motor mounts to a coupe without cutting a hole in the hood. The F10 M5's engine not only has less width and length: dropping 2 cylinders and direct injection. The height has also decreased dramatically compared to two snails sticking out of the top via revised bi-turbo engine. Inside the new engine compartment expect to see a lot more plumbing, two functional front bumper intakes to feed more air into the Bi-turbo V6. I wouldn’t count on having a hood air inlet towards the windscreen. Speculation about hood intakes only being advantageous above 110km/h. Expect the same power…. 375 rwhp available with a true M-power button with 100hp on tap. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2011, 02:47 PM | #154 | |
Moderator
7525
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Terrific! Thanks for asking, Harry.
Oh, and as an aside: <hagrid voice>You're a wizard, Harry!</hagrid voice> Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|