View Single Post
      05-28-2014, 10:16 AM   #293
Carl L
Major
Carl L's Avatar
196
Rep
1,248
Posts

Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: West Coast

iTrader: (0)

Thumbs down

Pretty dreadful fuel economy for a 3000cc engine in 2014, especially when compared to more powerful AMG Mercedes (all stats in US gallons and from MB.com and BMW.com):

-The E63 with a bi-turbo 5.5L with 550bhp and Four Wheel Drive manages 16 and 23.

-The SLK55, with a 5.5L V8, manages 19 and 28.

-Porsche aren't great with MPG yet even the 400bhp 3.8L 911 S does 20 and 27.

So 16 city is the same as the heavy, more powerful 4WD E63. The biggest issue though is that doing 24 mpg when taking a long trip means range is again going to greatly disappoint. Considering the pathetic range of the E9x, this really is a very poor showing from BMW.
Appreciate 0