Thread: S55 vs. S65
View Single Post
      12-16-2013, 06:49 PM   #67
Jockey
Brigadier General
Jockey's Avatar
United_States
1617
Rep
4,153
Posts

Drives: F80 SS/SS M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Park City, UT

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezio View Post
its not a inferior engine. its what the engine stands for is what i dislike. what i said about the cut costing is far from a opinion its a simple fact BTW.

maybe its BMW fault for ever making a S65 and S85. spoiling us
Again, not everyone thinks the S65 was the epitome of M engine manufacturing.

No one is disagreeing that the S55 is partly a result of saving cost. As for the engine being "cheaper", that's been debated in another thread and when you throw in all the ancillary costs associated with it, it's probably close in cost to a S65.

The fact that you feel it's your "need" to make sure everyone understands that the S55 is result of compromise, is again, showing insecurity on your part.