Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeFromPA
People on here - whether short or long term members - often treat M as something special and unique and intrinsically better.
Here's a hint: It's not.
Take a base 320i and spend a shitload of time on it's suspension, chassis, steering, brakes, engine, transmission, drivetrain, interior, and exterior and you get an M3.
But then again, take a 320i and invest a load of time and energy into a 340i M x-drive and you get something alot better too.
Without ever having driven it, people here are saying the f8x m3/m4 is better than the new 340i. Why? No reason given besides "it's not a true M car"
Fanboyism at it's finest.
|
Looking back at the past models, the previous M3 WAS better than the next gen top non m car... would you take an f30 335 over an e90 m3?
And it’s looking like there’s a lot of pork in the g20 340, so yes, we need to drive it, but it’s not complete without merit to have this POV