Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3
Not really fare comparing bad E9X times against the best of E46s...
|
Which is exactly what Mr.Metak2you did, just the other way around. He took the worst E46 time and compared with the best E9x time (or rather that's what C&D did).
I believe my videos show that the E9x is quicker, but not by a mile and that in the real world it can be quite close...
The F8x DCT does 0-1000m in 21,9 Seconds (MT 6 in 22,2 sec)
Performance:
M3 E46
0-100 km/h: 5,2 sec
0-1000 m: 23,7 sec @ 222km/h - 139 MPH (24,5 sec with MT 6)
Vmax: 250 km/h
N-Ring: 8:13 min
M3 E92
0-100 km/h: 4,6 sec
0-1000 m: 23,3 sec @ 228km/h - 143 MPH (24,4 sec with MT 6)
Vmax: 280 km/h
N-Ring: 8:00 min
M3 CSL
0-100 km/h: 4,9 sec
0-1000 m: 23,5 sec
Vmax: 280 km/h
N-Ring: 7:50 min
M3 GTS
0-100 km/h: 4,4 sec
0-1000 m: 22,5 sec
Vmax: 305 km/h
N-Ring: 7:40 min
M4 F82 DCT
0-100 km/h: 4,1 sec
0-1000 m: 21,9 sec (22,2 sec with MT 6)
Vmax: 250 km/h
N-Ring: ??? min
E92 was 0,4-0,9 sec quicker than the E46 from 0-1000m
E92 was 0,2sec quicker than the E46 CSL from 0-1000m
F82 is 1,4-2,2 sec quicker than the E92 from 0-1000m
So, to me it seems the F8x will actually deliver a larger difference from it's predecessor than what the E9x did over the E46...
The E46 CSL is 10 sec quicker than the E92 around the N'ring btw...
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=415833
http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/360...0-m-times.html
http://www.rsiauto.com/bmw/2000-m3-(e46)-253.php
http://www.rsiauto.com/bmw/2008-m3-sedan-(e90)-974.php
http://forum.roadfly.com/threads/228...M3-GENEVA-2000