Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezio
its not a inferior engine. its what the engine stands for is what i dislike. what i said about the cut costing is far from a opinion its a simple fact BTW.
maybe its BMW fault for ever making a S65 and S85. spoiling us
|
Again, not everyone thinks the S65 was the epitome of M engine manufacturing.
No one is disagreeing that the S55 is
partly a result of saving cost. As for the engine being "cheaper", that's been debated in another thread and when you throw in all the ancillary costs associated with it, it's probably close in cost to a S65.
The fact that you feel it's your "need" to make sure everyone understands that the S55 is result of compromise, is again, showing insecurity on your part.