Quote:
Originally Posted by E92inSG
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasF80
Thanks for this! I saw the timing multiplier tables for the OTS maps and above e70 is where things get a bit more aggressive. I just logged the 93 OTS and I am almost ready to fill with full e85 so I can log that. I'd be interested to see the e53 vs full e85 to see how much more they added (if any).
Edit*** Interesting I just looked over your logs vs my straight 93 log. I am seeing 14.5° timing vs 10° on your e53 log. Your 93 logs seem to be pretty low as well. But your boost pressure is 4# higher on all logs. Just an observation but seems strange.
https://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=608d...90c6744776b511 |
yeah that's very interesting. unless there's some other parameters built into the calibration that affects timing advance other than just fueling. not sure if heat is a factor. Car was run on a dyno with small fans, and ambient temps around 30+c (90+F).
in your logs it's looking like boost is being pulled at higher rpms and then timing advanced even further to make the power. Strange that both these OTS maps have differing strategies |
Here is an e72 log from a guy I have been talking to about OTS maps and logging. He has same actual boost but lower timing. Looks like I need to do some digging....
" Ran a couple logs at e72 today, any idea how these look? I see there is some timing differences between cylinders and the HPFP is not reaching the target..."
https://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=608f...0b43321c393db9
https://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=608f...0b43317755afda