View Single Post
      12-06-2013, 02:04 PM   #56
hellrotm
Banned
4143
Rep
6,926
Posts

Drives: F80
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ...Location...Location

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlhj83 View Post
Even if the Mustang matched the M3 for performance, I think the biggest difference would be durability; how long can the Mustang withstand hard use before something wears out or breaks. We already know that the M3 in general has very good durability over many many miles of both road and track use. I think this is why the M3 costs so much more. It is one thing to produce a fast car, it is another to make it durable.
No way a turbo engined M4 will be more reliable than a normally aspirated V8 Mustang. Even the current normally aspirated M3 is having engine reliability problems now, bearing clearance issues.
Appreciate 0