Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan
So do you guys think I should pass? I mean, I want the lowered stance but have no desire for a jarring ride. Is the SPASM in the Turbo S the same calibration/shocks installed on the C2S, or does the C2S get something different?
|
As I have posted previously, you should not get S-PASM for the stance, the primary consideration should be the desired ride-comfort/handling compromise. |
That's the conundrum I'm in. Both aspects are important to me, but not having any seat time behind the wheel of a SPASM 992 and very minimal seat time in a PASM 992 and non-PASM 991, it's a tough decision to make. I liked the way the non-PASM 991 I test drove handled and I liked the PASM 992 as well. Both felt like go karts. I find myself asking if I really need SPASM. It's a question that is difficult to answer. I do need a lower ride height though, so if it's not SPASM, it'll be TechArt or KW's HAS kits.