Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330
Which is exactly what Mr.Metak2you did, just the other way around. He took the worst E46 time and compared with the best E9x time (or rather that's what C&D did).
I believe my videos show that the E9x is quicker, but not by a mile and that in the real world it can be quite close... 
The F8x DCT does 0-1000m in 21,9 Seconds (MT 6 in 22,2 sec)
Performance:
M3 E46
0-100 km/h: 5,2 sec
0-1000 m: 23,7 sec @ 222km/h - 139 MPH (24,5 sec with MT 6)
Vmax: 250 km/h
N-Ring: 8:13 min
M3 E92
0-100 km/h: 4,6 sec
0-1000 m: 23,3 sec @ 228km/h - 143 MPH (24,4 sec with MT 6)
Vmax: 280 km/h
N-Ring: 8:00 min
M3 CSL
0-100 km/h: 4,9 sec
0-1000 m: 23,5 sec
Vmax: 280 km/h
N-Ring: 7:50 min
M3 GTS
0-100 km/h: 4,4 sec
0-1000 m: 22,5 sec
Vmax: 305 km/h
N-Ring: 7:40 min
M4 F82 DCT
0-100 km/h: 4,1 sec
0-1000 m: 21,9 sec
Vmax: 250 km/h
N-Ring: ??? min
E92 was 0,4-0,9 sec quicker than the E46 from 0-1000m
E92 was 0,2sec quicker than the E46 CSL from 0-1000m
F82 is 1,4 sec quicker than the E92 from 0-1000m
So, to me it seems the F8x will actually deliver a larger difference from it's predecessor than what the E9x did over the E46...  
The E46 CSL is 10 sec quicker than the E92 around the N'ring btw... 
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=415833
http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/360...0-m-times.html
http://www.rsiauto.com/bmw/2000-m3-(e46)-253.php
http://www.rsiauto.com/bmw/2008-m3-sedan-(e90)-974.php
http://forum.roadfly.com/threads/228...M3-GENEVA-2000 |
A 6MT E92 is only 0.1 quicker than a 6MT E46 on the standing km
?
If this is what you want to believe, I will not even try to argue with you
.