View Single Post
      12-12-2013, 11:35 PM   #292
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
611
Rep
10,407
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rated R View Post
Low fuel capacity is in part how BMW got the car down to 3,300 lbs. They do that all the time in designing motorcycles.
I guess one can't debate that this factor contributes to a lower official weight specifications. However, the official capacity reduction is 3 l (63 l -> 60 l). That is about 4.5 lb. If they really achieved a 25% improvement in fuel efficiency then that will certainly way more than cover the lost tank capacity. I guess I'd say hats off they actually got 2 birds with one stone on this one.

This would also take a somewhat typical 250 mi range (running her dry) up to right about 300 mi. That's also great.
__________________
E92 M3 | Space Gray on Fox Red | M-DCT | CF Roof | RAC RG63 Wheels | Brembo 380mm BBK |
| Vorsteiner Ti Exhaust | Matte Black Grilles/Side Gills/Rear Emblem/Mirrors |
| Alekshop Back up Camera | GP Thunders | BMW Aluminum Pedals | Elite Angels |
| XPEL Full Front Wrap | Hardwired V1 | Interior Xenon Light Kit |

Last edited by swamp2; 12-12-2013 at 11:59 PM..
Appreciate 0