| 07-29-2013, 11:59 PM | #45 |
|
Brigadier General
![]()
258
Rep 4,319
Posts |
With each successive clip I grow more impressed at the stability and pace of the car. Very tightly controlled body motions and appears to be quite a bit faster and more poised than the E9x. I expect this to be a fast car and hope BMW makes it more taught/aggressive (styling, driving dynamics) than the current M3.
__________________
GT3 RS | Desperately seeking the next great M car...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-30-2013, 10:11 AM | #51 |
|
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() 38
Rep 307
Posts |
looks good but I'm still not impressed. It's missing something...
prior to the e92 coming out, I was hell bent on gettin an e46. I was also iffy about the idea of an e92 prior to testing. However, when I saw the first test video at the ring I fell inlove. The e92 video caught my attention immediately, the sound the look (accent wise atleast, at that point), it just POPPED! I simply knew that was the M I wanted. The e92 testing video still brings a smile to my face because of that turning point in my decision to buy an M. The M4 video and the pics didn't provide that same feeling nor experience. Call me bias, I don't care. I rather wait around another couple years and see what comes next. Till then, the e92 will have a reserved VIP spot in my garage. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-30-2013, 10:33 AM | #52 |
|
Private First Class
![]()
3
Rep 147
Posts |
I don't know if anyone can answer this but I can't understand why the M4 is F82 whereas the 4 series is F32?????????????
the codename has never been different from 3 series to its ///M sibling |
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-30-2013, 10:40 AM | #53 |
|
Bimmer Fan
27
Rep 109
Posts
Drives: M4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles
|
I think it's because there are enough differences between the M and Non-M chassis that they warranted a different designation this generation.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-30-2013, 11:30 AM | #54 |
|
Major
![]()
244
Rep 1,425
Posts
Drives: MacanGTS, 991.2GT3, E63wagon
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bellevue WA / Oakville ON
|
I am hoping this is because there is some serious use of Aluminum and or CF in the chassis and body.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-30-2013, 01:07 PM | #55 |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 69
Rep 814
Posts |
Geeez the car is awesome! exhaust sounds better than the original stage of testing, at least i think.
__________________
21 M5C DD|21 M550 xDrive|05 E46M3 race car 6SPD|2019 2LT Corvette GS 7SPD track car|22 Tundra SR5 TRD Sport|19 Q7 V6 & 22 Q7 2.0T|20 G63|19 Vantage 4.0TT|22 Boxster 25 Year 6SPD sold|08 Porsche Cayman 5SPD sold|18 R8 RWS sold|Many previous cars
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-30-2013, 03:59 PM | #57 |
|
MacroRisk
128
Rep 2,522
Posts |
Agreed. Singularly unimpressed w/ the sound. Stance is OK. Design potentially a bit dull too - RS5 in the sights.
__________________
![]() Just thinking of something not so witty ///M3 E92 '09 Jerez Black | 6MT | Ext Fox Red | Tech | Prem | 19s |Heated Seats | iPod |Smartphone | Euro Deliv June 09 Sold: 540iT / 530i / 323i |
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-30-2013, 10:06 PM | #58 | |
|
Administrator
50589
Rep 21,473
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Check on the Latest BMW News
Become a fan of Bimmerpost Facebook Follow us on Bimmerpost Twitter Subscribe to Bimmerpost Youtube Channel |
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-31-2013, 12:56 AM | #59 | ||
|
Enlisted Member
![]() 3
Rep 42
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-31-2013, 01:27 AM | #60 |
|
///M3mber
189
Rep 430
Posts
Drives: 2008 E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern CA
|
This M4 actually looks like it's equipped with the carbon ceramic brakes, which are also offered as an option in the F10 M5. The optional carbon ceramic brakes on the F10 M5 also have gold calipers.
__________________
Last edited by surewin; 07-31-2013 at 01:34 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-31-2013, 01:30 AM | #61 | |
|
///M3mber
189
Rep 430
Posts
Drives: 2008 E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern CA
|
Quote:
That would be nice, but I believe that "nearly" means "almost" in this case. Since the M4 will be FI, there's no need to design a high revving motor for hp gains.
__________________
|
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-31-2013, 04:27 AM | #62 |
|
Private First Class
![]()
3
Rep 147
Posts |
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-31-2013, 09:28 AM | #63 |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
507
Rep 964
Posts
Drives: BMW M3
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los Angeles
|
Best video ever until now, serious car
![]()
__________________
The Best Is Yet To Come!
E30 - E36 - E39 - E53 - E60 - E87 - E90 - G80 - G05 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-31-2013, 03:41 PM | #64 |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 319
Rep 760
Posts
Drives: 2025 BMW M2
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia
|
I feel that the current M3 is plenty fast enough. Hell, I can't exploit probably 50% of its potential (yeah, I have no skills compared to a regular trackster or race car driver), but man, I look forward to the new M4. The potential lighter weight and more torque sound perfect and with possibly improved brakes it looks like M has addressed all of the short comings of the current M3, which is pretty spectacular I may add. A lot of stuff is speculation right now, but I look at the M4 video often and can't wait to take delivery of it. Do I love the sound of the V8? Sure! But I would love more midrange torque and daily drivability. I would love to feel more speed like when I drove a 991S or was in a R8 V10 plus!
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 07-31-2013, 04:52 PM | #65 | |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 191
Rep 537
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
| Bookmarks |
|
|