05-14-2015, 08:09 PM | #89 | |
Private First Class
54
Rep 109
Posts |
Quote:
The M3/M4, on the other hand, look quite a bit better compared to their regular counterparts. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-14-2015, 08:35 PM | #90 |
Private First Class
114
Rep 119
Posts |
Of course the best option is to keep the M3/4 and just swap out the C63's V8 TT and killer interior. That motor tuned with mild mods is going to produce some real power.
__________________
2023 M3 Comp XDrive
2018 Tesla MX Performance 2015 BMW M3 2013 Audi RS5 2010 Nissan GTR |
Appreciate
1
|
05-14-2015, 11:29 PM | #91 |
Bimmer Fanatic
368
Rep 1,660
Posts |
Exterior sucks, not aggressive at all.
Interior is beautiful! Coming from someone who loves the interior of the m3. I'm sure it'll be a fast car but meh... For that kind of money, I rather get a panamera, this car screams fast comfortable luxury sedan, not luxury street fighter like the m3. Personally, the exhaust argument is just stupid, you think the m3 doesn't sound good? open the valves, it's a new exhaust, then add down pipes, then it becomes a mean ass exhaust, then switch it to one of many exhausts that are available if your still not happy. As far as the S trim... You can bet your ass BMW is gonna have a reworked engine tune for the comp pack. This comp pack is gonna be way more robust. So for a car that is already faster than the c63 at its own game, in a straight line, with a pending comp pack version which will like have engine tuning putting out 40-50 more hp, your looking at two cars that almost don't fall in the same category. Don't even get me started on the transmission, 6mt or dct vs an automatic. The C63 is admirable, the M3 gets my money all day. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 12:24 AM | #92 |
First Lieutenant
365
Rep 362
Posts |
We got the car back on the road today. There was a clip that came off a coolant hose which caused all of the coolant to leak out.
The weather wasn't great today, so we couldn't do much with comparisons. We decided to head to the scales to get an idea of how much they weigh. Here's the results. M3 1620 kgs = 3571 lbs C63S 1820 kgs = 4012 lbs Difference of 200 kgs = 441 lbs Options that affect weight with the M3: - 6MT - CF roof - Full leather - 19" wheels - Steel brakes - Catless downpipes - Full tank of gas Options that affect weight of the C63s: - Panoramic roof - 19" wheels - AMG performance seats - CCB - 3/4 tank of gas |
Appreciate
13
|
05-15-2015, 01:31 AM | #95 |
Brigadier General
2939
Rep 4,087
Posts |
coolmody
So to correct the gas issue ( Some will argue)for the C63s ( A Gallon of gas is about 6lbs x 4.5=27 additional pounds for the C63s for a 3/4 tank) Correct is 4039 for the C63s. M3 has the Exec Pack/LEDs- I wonder how much the catless makes a difference. Does the M3 have HK? Also the M3 has Exec Pack. Would be safe to say the M is loaded minus, DCT and Carbons? |
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 02:01 AM | #97 |
Banned
167
Rep 680
Posts |
I think my wife would kill me if I dare and buy another high performance vehicle.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 02:09 AM | #98 | |
Mlightened
1852
Rep 2,242
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks for the updates. I gotta be honest, that AMG has some real presence, it is starting to look very handsome, it's not aggressive but it has a refined muscular stance. 400 plus pounds is a lot and the auto tranny and column shifter are two details that are hard to swallow. This car will be fast and when tuned will be a monster, but with it's skinny tires and shallow fenders, straight line performance will be where it shines most....but in all honesty that is what 80%(if not more) of buyers just do with these cars(M3/4 & AMG), just go straight.....to Walmart, dinner, mall, cars & coffee, work, school..... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 05:09 AM | #99 | |
First Lieutenant
365
Rep 362
Posts |
Quote:
C63 is loaded with Burmester sound. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-15-2015, 06:34 AM | #100 |
Captain
378
Rep 647
Posts |
[QUOTE=azzurro;17907688]One of these is my next car. I'm currently driving a 2013 335i M Sport and the Mercedes C63 AMG got my attention. Why? V8 vs. I6, 469 HP vs. 425, 4.0 0-60 vs. 4.1.
Handling, I don't know. Didn't Jeremy Clarkson describe the C63 as, "an axe murderer trying to kill me?" |
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 06:46 AM | #101 | |
Captain
146
Rep 795
Posts |
[QUOTE=marcva;17915490]
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 06:47 AM | #102 | |
Captain
146
Rep 795
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 06:51 AM | #103 |
never could compete with Lloyd Braun
5275
Rep 5,378
Posts |
Thanks for the weight comparison! Both cars do look great, IMO.
__________________
2022 G80 M3 6MT | Skyscraper Gray | Kyalami Orange
2018 F87 M2 6MT | Alpine White (sold) 2016 981 Cayman 6MT | Jet Black (sold) 2015 F80 M3 DCT | Tanzanite Blue | Gold Brown (sold) 2013 E92 M3 6MT | Mineral White | Fox Red/Black (sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 08:01 AM | #104 |
Lieutenant Colonel
767
Rep 1,683
Posts |
Wow, the C63 weighs a bit more than my RS5, which is also fully loaded plus AWD.
Not very encouraging....
__________________
22 M4 Competition xdrive
19 M5 Competition sold 16 F-Type S AWD sold 11 Audi RS5 Misano Red--sold 08 E92 M3 Jerez Black 6MT--sold 08 E92 335i 6MT traded in for M3 |
Appreciate
2
|
05-15-2015, 09:05 AM | #105 | |
Philosophiae Doctor
208
Rep 873
Posts |
Quote:
We won't know the true C63S weight until we find out the pano weight. Guesstimates are anywhere from 88 lbs to 220 lbs. The former is from about 7 years ago and the latter might be on the high side. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 12:19 PM | #107 |
Captain
161
Rep 763
Posts |
Thanks for the weight numbers
IMHO the C looks great, a great blend of elegance and brutality. I can see the M3's exterior being too "in your face" for some, though it's my choice between the two cars since I prefer the more aggressive exterior and it comes in stick, despite the C's superior exhaust note. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 01:49 PM | #108 | |
Major General
5457
Rep 7,037
Posts |
Quote:
- 220 lbs was a misunderstanding from reading a euro spec. the weight was not that of the roof but how much weight you can max add to the roof on roof racks etc. - The real added weight of the roof was confirmed by AMG to be 88 lbs. - The car in question was an E55. So it was a larger car/roof with older or the same tech that weighed 88 lbs. I doubt the C63's is heavier. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2015, 03:01 PM | #109 | |
Major
410
Rep 1,025
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|