|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-27-2014, 02:41 PM | #45 | |
Major General
1740
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
But quite why a 60/40 distribution (like an Audi) is better for handling is not obvious to me If there is one thing the Audis aren't getting good reviews on, it has to be their understeer and lack of agile handling... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 02:41 PM | #46 |
Colonel
1309
Rep 2,785
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 02:43 PM | #47 | |
General
21162
Rep 20,754
Posts
Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 02:47 PM | #48 | |
Major General
1740
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 02:49 PM | #49 | |
General
21162
Rep 20,754
Posts
Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
IIRC, swamp is also implying that a 40/60 (front/rear) is optimal, I don't recal he ever stated that front heavy cars handle better... I can't comment on which is the "optimal" weight disrtibution. All I am saying is that rear weight bias makes the car easier to pivot, hence more nimble. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 02:55 PM | #50 |
Brigadier General
1887
Rep 3,027
Posts |
Exciting article and responses. I think "no one will be prepared for this engine" means the torque onslaught + gearing + low weight + fast revving attitude.
Something people haven't commented on too much is the concept of a much lighter rotating mass. So far we have significant weight savings in the crankshaft and driveshaft - two usually massive inertial points. If both have been lightened, this engine should respond amazingly given similar tuning. ... On another note, stop with the commenting on "This weight distribution is better". We've seen 40:60 weight distributions (911s) rock the racetrack. We've seen 50:50. We've seen 60:40. We've seen 45:55 (mid-engine). Each has it's own advantages and it depends upon the track and conditions as well. Different weight distributions are better for different things. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 02:58 PM | #51 | |
General
21162
Rep 20,754
Posts
Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
Show me such a front weight biased car that rocked the race track against more rear biased cars... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:13 PM | #52 | |
Driving Mika all over California.....
57
Rep 619
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2008 E60 M5 Sepang Bronze Metallic, gloss black grills and gills, LED side markers, 12mm spacers all around, stud conversion kit, custom exhaust with Magnaflow mufflers and x-pipe.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:15 PM | #54 | ||
Lieutenant General
1221
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:17 PM | #55 | |
Lieutenant General
1221
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:17 PM | #56 |
Driving Mika all over California.....
57
Rep 619
Posts |
Yeah, I went back and edited.
__________________
2008 E60 M5 Sepang Bronze Metallic, gloss black grills and gills, LED side markers, 12mm spacers all around, stud conversion kit, custom exhaust with Magnaflow mufflers and x-pipe.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:19 PM | #57 | |
Major General
1740
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...6&postcount=18 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:20 PM | #58 |
Bulldog
485
Rep 3,355
Posts |
Engine is an animal with shocking capabilities..... blah blah blah! I don't think it's going to be much different than the 1M engine with a proper tune on it. The torque will be the most fun, but if someone has not driven a 1M with a tune on it then it will be loads of new fun compared to an E9x M3. The day to day driving of the 1M is just overall more fun than a E9x M3. It's the torque that makes you drive with a constant smile.
The only difference that I am hoping for is that the torque is there at all times on the track for the new M3/4. With the 1M it can kind of come on quick and keeps you on your toes. If the torque delivery is slightly smoother, then we have some improvements over a tuned 1M engine. Just my thoughts. At any rate, I'm looking forward to the real life comparison!
__________________
Prev: Individual F80 M3 - Fjord Blue/Silverstone(interior) | Fashion Grey(exterior)
GTS |
Appreciate
1
|
01-27-2014, 03:22 PM | #59 |
Dejan
1760
Rep 4,194
Posts
Drives: 2018 Audi S3
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan Ave.
iTrader: (6)
Garage List 2013 BMW 335i [10.00]
2015 BMW 228i M Spo ... [0.00] 2013 Ford Focus (DD) [0.00] 2001 Alfa Romeo 156 [0.00] |
This car just makes me smile more and more!!!
Can't wait to see it at the Chicago auto show.
__________________
FBO-PS1 and stuff
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:23 PM | #60 | |
TIM YOYO
1506
Rep 3,282
Posts
Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
|
Quote:
I'll add that weight distribution is only one factor. You can have a 40/60 (front/rear) weight distribution and still have a horrible handling (and probably dangerous) car. As CanAutM3 mentioned in the last paragraph, the rear-biased car will rotate more easily, but beyond the limit of traction, that rotation can bite you. The trick is in finding the balance between "rotates well" and "wants to swap ends, so watch out". As has been pointed out, the one thing you don't want is front-heavy weight distribution. You're fighting an up-hill battle at that point. Kudos to BMW for working hard at hitting the 50/50 number, which I would consider a minimum acceptable distribution.
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:24 PM | #61 | |
TIM YOYO
1506
Rep 3,282
Posts
Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
|
Quote:
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:25 PM | #62 |
Captain
66
Rep 814
Posts |
lets wait and see
__________________
21 M5C DD|21 M550 xDrive|05 E46M3 race car 6SPD|2019 2LT Corvette GS 7SPD track car|22 Tundra SR5 TRD Sport|19 Q7 V6 & 22 Q7 2.0T|20 G63|19 Vantage 4.0TT|22 Boxster 25 Year 6SPD sold|08 Porsche Cayman 5SPD sold|18 R8 RWS sold|Many previous cars
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:29 PM | #63 | |
Brigadier General
1887
Rep 3,027
Posts |
Quote:
C'mon, all factors are not equal. I can provide plenty of that. My point was there is more to the equation that simple weight distribution. For example, a vehicle with more of it's mass closer to the lowest, most central point may handle better than a car with simply an equal distribution of weight across both axles. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 03:48 PM | #65 |
*_*
817
Rep 3,158
Posts |
My thoughts exactly, I mean, what's this guys going to say, "meh, the car is 'ok'..." I don't think so broski
All cynicism aside, I'm liking this car more and more I see it in real picts and videos. I bore easily, so I'm ready for something new and shiny...and FAST. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|