R44 Performance
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Forum > BMW M3 (F80) and BMW M4 (F82) General Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-05-2013, 12:22 AM   #1
DarkTrigger
Professional
DarkTrigger's Avatar
United_States
50
Rep
977
Posts

Drives: 335i MPPK
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: LB, SoCal

iTrader: (0)

M4 Under 3,300 lbs for real?

I came across this little article from my May 2013 issue of Automobilmag. 3,300 lbs is z4 28i territory...

Name:  edit 002.jpg
Views: 6861
Size:  683.8 KB
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2013, 11:08 AM   #2
AhsanU
i can haz horsepowr ??
AhsanU's Avatar
4363
Rep
2,065
Posts

Drives: inconspicuous white van
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Westchester, N.Y.

iTrader: (2)

I somehow massively doubt that it'll be THAT light. But we can always hope.
__________________
@dakar.g80
Gone but not forgotten: G80 M3, 991.1 GT3, F80 M3 ZCP, E46 M3
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2013, 11:44 AM   #3
Inge_F
Private
43
Rep
63
Posts

Drives: F30 335i MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

One can only hope.
But for the first time there will be a different internal code between the M and the standard 3-series platform, (f80 vs f30). Lets hope this means that the structures are so different from each other that there will be room for massive weight savings. Why would they else use different codes??

Once again, one can only hope...
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2013, 01:18 PM   #4
M3takesNYC
Banned
19
Rep
426
Posts

Drives: m3
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

I don't see why not since the current e9x is actually 3550 as weighed by many owners indepedantly through the years. The e46 was 3450 which is much higher than most actually know. So to shave 200 pounds is not super easy, its also not really that difficult for a manufacterer with access to change the sound material, body panels, suspension component materials/subframe material etc

I expect it to weigh 3400 to be honest which with 420 "rated" and more likely 450 true hp as they always underrate engines
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2013, 05:01 PM   #5
MisterEm
Second Lieutenant
33
Rep
203
Posts

Drives: slow turd
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: huh

iTrader: (0)

Thumbs up Lets stop spreading bad data

If it achieves 3300 lb curb weight, this car will break some hearts and egos with that powerband.


OT and a but needs to be said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3takesNYC View Post
The e46 was 3450 which is much higher than most actually know.
Its more than most folks know because that dataset is invalid. 3450 lbs is not what the 46M weighs unless you are smuggling a pair of 3rd graders in the trunk.

Here is real data:

My car came off the factory floor one of the fattest M3 coupes (I called her Miss Piggy back then) you can order and even with additional stereo components STILL did not achieve the weight you claim.

With almost a full tank of gas, sunroof, SMG, PDC, OEM 19" boat anchors, nav and a 12" speaker box + 5 channel amp (+65 lbs) topped out at 3410. ZERO weight reduction - tool box and M mobility kit still in the trunk. I was trying to get it as FAT as possible for my initial weigh in before I put her on a diet.

This weight from the Long-Acre scales (http://www.longacreracing.com/catalo...p?id=1&catid=1 ) was verified by the CCA at several Auto-X events that first year on their scales as well.

Just for reference, non-sunroof 6MT car is right at or below 3300 stock on the same scales. Sunroof (+45), SMG (+15) and NAV (+10) do not add 150 pounds to the 46M's weight. I have removed those components from my car and weighed them and the car afterwards.


Miss piggy today sits at 3290 lbs with the full interior, the same stereo and 1/2 tank of gas.
__________________
Naturally Agitated - S54B34 CSL Clone - 395 285 SAE on 91 pump - 3150 lbs - P car and E9X eater.

Last edited by MisterEm; 04-05-2013 at 08:36 PM..
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2013, 06:47 PM   #6
HBspeed
Lieutenant
HBspeed's Avatar
49
Rep
593
Posts

Drives: 05 M3, 00 Z3MC, Boxster Spyder
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Official BMW Weights

Official BMW Weights:
(with a few official Audi and Porsche weights thrown in for comparison)


DIN curb weight (preliminary as they call it):

E30 M3 at 1,225 kg = 2,701 lbs
Z3MC (S52) 1,345 kg = 2,967 lbs
997.2 GT3RS 1370 kg = 3,020 lbs
E36 M3 at 1,385 kg = 3,053 lbs
Z4M Coupe 1390 kg = 3,066 lbs
997.2 GT3 1395 kg = 3,075 lbs
TT-RS at 1,450 kg = 3197 lbs
E46 M3 at 1,474 kg = 3,250 lbs
E82 1M at 1,495 kg = 3,296 lbs
R8 V8 at 1560 kg = 3,440 lbs
E92 M3 at 1,605 kg = 3,538 lbs
R8 V10 at 1695 kg = 3,571 lbs


EU standard weight:

E30 M3 at 1,300 kg = 2,865 lbs
Z3MC (S52) 1,420 kg = 3121 lbs
997.2 GT3RS 1445 kg = 3,186 lbs
E36 M3 at 1,460 kg = 3,219 lbs
Z4M Coupe 1,465 kg = 3,230 lbs
997.2 GT3 1470 kg = 3,241 lbs
TT-RS at 1,525 kg = 3,362 lbs
E46 M3 at 1,549 kg = 3,415 lbs
E82 1M at 1,570 kg = 3,461 lbs
R8 V8 at 1635 kg = 3,604 lbs
E92 M3 at 1,680 kg = 3,704 lbs
R8 V10 at 1695 kg = 3,737 lbs

EU is DIN + 68kg driver and 7kg luggage.
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2013, 08:40 PM   #7
MisterEm
Second Lieutenant
33
Rep
203
Posts

Drives: slow turd
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: huh

iTrader: (0)

Thumbs up Great comparison info!

Quote:
Originally Posted by HBspeed View Post
Official BMW Weights:
(with a few official Audi and Porsche weights thrown in for comparison)


DIN curb weight (preliminary as they call it):

E30 M3 at 1,225 kg = 2,701 lbs
Z3MC (S52) 1,345 kg = 2,967 lbs
997.2 GT3RS 1370 kg = 3,020 lbs
E36 M3 at 1,385 kg = 3,053 lbs
Z4M Coupe 1390 kg = 3,066 lbs
997.2 GT3 1395 kg = 3,075 lbs
TT-RS at 1,450 kg = 3197 lbs
E46 M3 at 1,474 kg = 3,250 lbs
E82 1M at 1,495 kg = 3,296 lbs
R8 V8 at 1560 kg = 3,440 lbs
E92 M3 at 1,605 kg = 3,538 lbs
R8 V10 at 1695 kg = 3,571 lbs


EU is DIN + 68kg driver and 7kg luggage.
3250. I stand corrected. Thanks for the additional BMW data. Jives well with what the corner balance scales show. Generally, the E9X's are in the high 36XX's and E46's in the low 33XX's wet-weight on the same scales.
__________________
Naturally Agitated - S54B34 CSL Clone - 395 285 SAE on 91 pump - 3150 lbs - P car and E9X eater.
Appreciate 0
      04-06-2013, 05:59 AM   #8
NISFAN
Major General
NISFAN's Avatar
United Kingdom
3425
Rep
9,708
Posts

Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bedford UK

iTrader: (0)

I see in the attached article, they mention CCB in the mix to get to this weight. No doubt CCB will be an expensive option to save the weight. Standard steel braked cars will weigh +30-40lbs
Appreciate 0
      04-06-2013, 08:41 AM   #9
Inge_F
Private
43
Rep
63
Posts

Drives: F30 335i MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NISFAN View Post
I see in the attached article, they mention CCB in the mix to get to this weight. No doubt CCB will be an expensive option to save the weight. Standard steel braked cars will weigh +30-40lbs
On a M5 it saves 42,8lb, probably a little less on a M3, since the rotors and calipers will be smaller in the first place, (6 piston front cal. on M5, probably 4piston on m3)
Appreciate 0
      04-06-2013, 08:54 AM   #10
MisterEm
Second Lieutenant
33
Rep
203
Posts

Drives: slow turd
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: huh

iTrader: (0)

Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by NISFAN View Post
I see in the attached article, they mention CCB in the mix to get to this weight. No doubt CCB will be an expensive option to save the weight. Standard steel braked cars will weigh +30-40lbs
Interesting. What does the CCB option cost on the M5? Is that the $6500 "performance upgrade" listed on the build site?
__________________
Naturally Agitated - S54B34 CSL Clone - 395 285 SAE on 91 pump - 3150 lbs - P car and E9X eater.
Appreciate 0
      04-08-2013, 02:16 AM   #11
Capt Slow
Private
Capt Slow's Avatar
0
Rep
83
Posts

Drives: E39 530i Sport Individual
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: "The merry old land of Aus"

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inge_F View Post
On a M5 it saves 42,8lb, probably a little less on a M3, since the rotors and calipers will be smaller in the first place, (6 piston front cal. on M5, probably 4piston on m3)
...Don't be so sure of that, check these out:

http://www.f30post.com/goodiesforyou...3/BMW-M4-j.jpg

http://www.f30post.com/goodiesforyou...3/BMW-M4-g.jpg

They are definitely 6 piston front calipers on the front and the rears look to be 4 piston, not those single piston sliders like on the M5/M6 CCB option...
__________________
"Smoke me a kipper,
I'll be back for breakfast."
Appreciate 0
      04-08-2013, 05:11 AM   #12
Inge_F
Private
43
Rep
63
Posts

Drives: F30 335i MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt Slow View Post
...Don't be so sure of that, check these out:

http://www.f30post.com/goodiesforyou...3/BMW-M4-j.jpg

http://www.f30post.com/goodiesforyou...3/BMW-M4-g.jpg

They are definitely 6 piston front calipers on the front and the rears look to be 4 piston, not those single piston sliders like on the M5/M6 CCB option...
These are pics of testing of the CCBs, and you are correct, those will be 6 piston at the front and 4 at the rear.
But I was talking about the standard steel brakes, those will probably be 4 piston fixed alu cal. at the front and 2 piston fixed at the rear on the new m3/4. In other words, smaller and lighter then the standars on m5.
Point is that the difference between CCB and steel will be slightly less on M3/4 than it is on M5.
I`m also happy that M gmbh are finally ditching those sliding cals.
Appreciate 0
      04-08-2013, 03:46 PM   #13
MisterEm
Second Lieutenant
33
Rep
203
Posts

Drives: slow turd
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: huh

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inge_F View Post
These are pics of testing of the CCBs, and you are correct, those will be 6 piston at the front and 4 at the rear.
But I was talking about the standard steel brakes, those will probably be 4 piston fixed alu cal. at the front and 2 piston fixed at the rear on the new m3/4. In other words, smaller and lighter then the standars on m5.
Point is that the difference between CCB and steel will be slightly less on M3/4 than it is on M5.
I`m also happy that M gmbh are finally ditching those sliding cals.
If this is indeed correct, it should be a win-win for both regular M cars ditching the old sliding calipers and those that pony up for the CCB upgrades.

I may be in the minority when I say this, but I could care less how much more power this new M has over the S65 variant (415, 430, 455 blah) ... as all M cars make more power than their predecessor.

I won't consider ordering one until the sedan is independently weighed. Anything south of #3400 and I may tell my son he can pay for his own undergraduate and graduate school like his dad did! Crank HP won't impact that decision, sadly.

I must be getting old...
__________________
Naturally Agitated - S54B34 CSL Clone - 395 285 SAE on 91 pump - 3150 lbs - P car and E9X eater.
Appreciate 0
      04-08-2013, 03:47 PM   #14
NISFAN
Major General
NISFAN's Avatar
United Kingdom
3425
Rep
9,708
Posts

Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bedford UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterEm View Post
Interesting. What does the CCB option cost on the M5? Is that the $6500 "performance upgrade" listed on the build site?
Yes something like that....not cheap.
Appreciate 0
      04-08-2013, 03:53 PM   #15
NISFAN
Major General
NISFAN's Avatar
United Kingdom
3425
Rep
9,708
Posts

Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bedford UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt Slow View Post
...Don't be so sure of that, check these out:

http://www.f30post.com/goodiesforyou...3/BMW-M4-j.jpg

http://www.f30post.com/goodiesforyou...3/BMW-M4-g.jpg

They are definitely 6 piston front calipers on the front and the rears look to be 4 piston, not those single piston sliders like on the M5/M6 CCB option...
I do hope that is just a generic CCB test, not real M3/M4 brakes, they look like the brakes you NEED on a heavy car

The M5/M6 CCB's use the exact same calipers as the stock versions, just different pads and discs, and down rated booster. I hope M3 goes the same way
Appreciate 0
      04-08-2013, 04:08 PM   #16
DUI Elite
///M at Heart
DUI Elite's Avatar
90
Rep
1,954
Posts

Drives: 06 SGM E90, 15 BSM E84
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chicago, IL

iTrader: (4)

very highly doubt it.

Its larger than the outgoing E92. E92 335's are around what 3700 lbs on a good day?

edit: just saw the weight comparo's. I don't think it'll be under 3500 for sure.
Appreciate 0
      04-08-2013, 04:10 PM   #17
NISFAN
Major General
NISFAN's Avatar
United Kingdom
3425
Rep
9,708
Posts

Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bedford UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DUI Elite View Post
very highly doubt it.

Its larger than the outgoing E92. E92 335's are around what 3700 lbs on a good day?
F30 is lighter than E90
Appreciate 0
      04-08-2013, 08:38 PM   #18
DarkTrigger
Professional
DarkTrigger's Avatar
United_States
50
Rep
977
Posts

Drives: 335i MPPK
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: LB, SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Well, going from a v8 to an i6 should reduce some weight.
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2013, 01:33 PM   #19
hilals
New Member
3
Rep
13
Posts

Drives: 2008 BMW 335 XI
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Montreal, Quebec

iTrader: (0)

Can't wait to buy this car, will be a good upgrade from my E90 335XI !
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2013, 03:00 PM   #20
DiavelM3
4 Star General -Twilight Zone
DiavelM3's Avatar
United_States
38
Rep
1,032
Posts

Drives: '11 E92 M3 ZCP
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 5280

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkTrigger View Post
Well, going from a v8 to an i6 should reduce some weight.
The current V8 S65 is already lighter than the previous gen. E46 M3 I6....
But I'm sure they will reduce weight where they can. Target = 300 lbs. less than current E9x
__________________
'12 Ducati Diavel
'06 E46 M3 (sold) | '97 325is - Dinan (sold)
'02 Z3 3.0 coupe (sold)
Past - '84 Ferrari 308 GTSI | '88 Ferrari 328 GTS | '05 Dodge Viper Copperhead Edition #180/300 | Audi S4
Appreciate 0
      04-09-2013, 03:51 PM   #21
Inge_F
Private
43
Rep
63
Posts

Drives: F30 335i MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiavelM3 View Post
The current V8 S65 is already lighter than the previous gen. E46 M3 I6....
But I'm sure they will reduce weight where they can. Target = 300 lbs. less than current E9x
No wonder, S54 block was made of cast iron, with the S65 they moved to alu-block, that helps on the weight...
Appreciate 0
      05-20-2013, 07:59 PM   #22
TheYoungConnoisseur
Lieutenant
TheYoungConnoisseur's Avatar
91
Rep
455
Posts

Drives: Your car at the track
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: usa

iTrader: (0)

Turbos, piping, intercooler etc ads a ton of weight that would offset any differences from losing 2 cyl and some displacement. I seriously doubt it will be 3400 wet regardless.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2014 bmw m3, 2014 m3, 2014 m3 forum, 2015 bmw m3, 2015 bmw m4, 2015 m3, 2015 m4, bmw f80, bmw f80 forum, bmw f80 forums, bmw f80 m3, bmw f80 m3 sedan, bmw f82, bmw f82 forum, bmw f82 forums, bmw f82 m3, bmw f82 m3 coupe, bmw f82 m3 forum, bmw f82 m4, bmw f82 m4 coupe, bmw f83, bmw f83 m3, bmw f83 m4, bmw m forum, bmw m forums, bmw m4, bmw m4 coupe, bmw m4 coupe forum, bmw m4 forum, bmw m4 forums, f80, f80 forum, f80 forums, f80 m3, f80 m3 forum, f80 m3 forums, f80 m3 sedan, f82, f82 coupe, f82 forum, f82 forums, f82 m3, f82 m3 coupe, f82 m3 forum, f82 m4, f82 m4 coupe, f82 m4 forum, f82 m4 forums, f83 m3, f83 m4, m forum, m forums, m3 f80, m3 f80 forum, m3 f80 forums, m4 forum, m4 forums

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST