Autotalent
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Technical Topics > Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust / Bolt-ons / Tuning

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-30-2021, 01:21 PM   #45
StockM4
Lieutenant
No_Country
171
Rep
447
Posts

Drives: BMW M3
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: new york

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TopJimmy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commanderwiggin View Post
In your 1st Revision datalog (tagged blew motor) you were getting very imbalanced fuel trims which is indicative of a fuel system issue.

Boost was around 29psi throughout the log; throttle was doing it's thing earlier in the log to control the torque delivery.

I don't see anything in the log monitoring the low pressure side of things to see what your Port Fuel pressure was doing when this happened but the AFR's look fine. Timing is a bit aggressive for what looks like really bad quality pump fuel...don't know since you don't have a flex sensor.

I wouldn't be pointing blame at the tuner...there are some things that could be pointed both ways here.
I just don't understand how the base map everything was fine i did multiple pulls on that map. And suddenly paul makes changes, sends me a revision and on the FIRST pull i do on that revision this happens.
Bud, it was like Rev 2 when one of my DIs went pissing. I knew sh!t could pop but my base map and rev 1 were like SOOOO awesome. Then logging rev 2 as I topped out 4th gear and shifted I heard BLAAAAAAAAAAAA (fuu-UUK!!!) It's Murphy's Law man…sh!t happens at the worst time. I didn't blame Paul and knew I was in the Pay-To-Play game.
So then why are other tuners saying it was tune related.
Another tuner also told me i was past the safe limits with being over 28psi
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2021, 01:40 PM   #46
StockM4
Lieutenant
No_Country
171
Rep
447
Posts

Drives: BMW M3
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: new york

iTrader: (1)

Also i ask this, so if i had a motiv reflex would this have not happened…?
Im planning to do PI again so need to know.. unless there's a safer option on how to run FULL E85 on upgraded turbos without meth or pi
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2021, 01:44 PM   #47
TopJimmy
Major General
TopJimmy's Avatar
United_States
5457
Rep
5,151
Posts

Drives: 2023 M3 Comp xDrive
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Chester County, PA

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
So then why are other tuners saying it was tune related.
Another tuner also told me i was past the safe limits with being over 28psi
When these things happen other tuners don't want to spend any time on looking at your logs. If you say it's overboost then they will usually agree and go back to their own business, especially if they see you haven't done your homework. My extra hot tune race gets me 26 mid-gear with bumps near 28 on stock turbos & DI, and you run bigger turbos plus PI, so 28 doesn't sound overly high to me. Now being mid-gear at 33-34PSI (prolly with 40+ PSI peaks), that's a lot.

Here's how I learned to read logs, in case it helps you or others here.

https://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1732327
__________________
'18 F80 Base 6MT | '19 F82 Exec DCT | '18 F82 Comp Exec DCT | '23 G80cx

Last edited by TopJimmy; 07-30-2021 at 01:52 PM..
Appreciate 3
      07-30-2021, 01:53 PM   #48
Commanderwiggin
Major
Commanderwiggin's Avatar
2050
Rep
1,200
Posts

Drives: M2C - X3M - Turbo E46 M3 - 45E
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SOCAL

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
I just don't understand how the base map everything was fine i did multiple pulls on that map. And suddenly paul makes changes, sends me a revision and on the FIRST pull i do on that revision this happens.
First revision was less boost and you probably have a fuel-it stage w/e setup that isn't properly setup with a split sec aic controller?
- Fuel pressure was likely rising rate so it would've ramped up and caused the factory ekp to try and ramp down to control fuel pressure at target...then it would've ramped right back because there would be a drastic dip in fuel pressure (this likely would've happened several times and this is hard to even see in most logs due to logging frequency)
- The fuel-it fuelab regulators are pretty trash and don't regulate very well when compared to the PR stuff...not to mention pr stuff is half the cost. BUT regardless of this the base pressure needs to be setup properly to avoid the issue above.
- The port injection plate o-rings are consistently a point of failure during install...unsure if related to specific company/o-rings/design/etc... but an EOS manifold will always negate this issue.
- The bosch injectors aren't necessarily flow balanced like an Injector Dynamics ID1050X injector by example.
- The AIC controller is like trying to control your cars fueling with squirt gun built off windows 95 (playing minesweeper as a good analogy).

With a bump in one calibration...from your base cal which was fine to a single new calibration which was demanding more from your compromised setup; it's an unfortunate thing really. Both parties could've done more to prevent this issue but in this case the tuner seems to have provided all the services that they are required to and this looks like a hardware setup issue which is unfortunate for you because in this case you seem like you just wanted a fast car and shouldn't be expected to know everything there is to know about fuel delivery...it's a tough spot. So in a nutshell it broke, and now you fix it/sell it/etc... but I hope I've helped you identify some of the possible issues and things to look at so this can be avoided for you (or someone else) in the future.
__________________
575RWHP F87 M2C - ECUTEK RACEROM with flex fuel tuning by Bend Calibration
1000+RWHP E46 M3, Lab22 Built Turbo S54, Bend Calibration Tuned - BMW Half Mile Record Holder
Appreciate 1
TopJimmy5457.00
      07-30-2021, 01:57 PM   #49
StockM4
Lieutenant
No_Country
171
Rep
447
Posts

Drives: BMW M3
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: new york

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commanderwiggin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
I just don't understand how the base map everything was fine i did multiple pulls on that map. And suddenly paul makes changes, sends me a revision and on the FIRST pull i do on that revision this happens.
First revision was less boost and you probably have a fuel-it stage w/e setup that isn't properly setup with a split sec aic controller?
- Fuel pressure was likely rising rate so it would've ramped up and caused the factory ekp to try and ramp down to control fuel pressure at target...then it would've ramped right back because there would be a drastic dip in fuel pressure (this likely would've happened several times and this is hard to even see in most logs due to logging frequency)
- The fuel-it fuelab regulators are pretty trash and don't regulate very well when compared to the PR stuff...not to mention pr stuff is half the cost. BUT regardless of this the base pressure needs to be setup properly to avoid the issue above.
- The port injection plate o-rings are consistently a point of failure during install...unsure if related to specific company/o-rings/design/etc... but an EOS manifold will always negate this issue.
- The bosch injectors aren't necessarily flow balanced like an Injector Dynamics ID1050X injector by example.
- The AIC controller is like trying to control your cars fueling with squirt gun built off windows 95 (playing minesweeper as a good analogy).

With a bump in one calibration...from your base cal which was fine to a single new calibration which was demanding more from your compromised setup; it's an unfortunate thing really. Both parties could've done more to prevent this issue but in this case the tuner seems to have provided all the services that they are required to and this looks like a hardware setup issue which is unfortunate for you because in this case you seem like you just wanted a fast car and shouldn't be expected to know everything there is to know about fuel delivery on one of these cars...it's a tough spot. So in a nutshell it broke, and now you fix it/sell it/etc... but I hope I've helped you identify some of the possible issues and things to look at so this can be avoided for you (or someone else) in the future.
I had BMP PI, with BMP Stage 3 pump with aic1 controller.
Car is gone already so im just gonna get another m4. So u think going with motiv reflex would be the 100% safest option if going pi again?
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2021, 02:02 PM   #50
Commanderwiggin
Major
Commanderwiggin's Avatar
2050
Rep
1,200
Posts

Drives: M2C - X3M - Turbo E46 M3 - 45E
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SOCAL

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
I had BMP PI, with BMP Stage 3 pump with aic1 controller.
Car is gone already so im just gonna get another m4. So u think going with motiv reflex would be the 100% safest option if going pi again?
Ok yeah if you had BMP/PR then the regulator pressure was likely too high and/or the other issues possibly compounding it...could've even been a bad direct injector too that just so happened to go bad at the time of the new tune. Motiv Reflex 100% is a better option if you have a tuner who knows how to set that up. I always recommend Bend Calibration as he knows how to properly go through the Port Fuel issues as I mentioned above (this info above is from a few high power friends tuned by them and I saw Bend work through the proper setup with them.)
__________________
575RWHP F87 M2C - ECUTEK RACEROM with flex fuel tuning by Bend Calibration
1000+RWHP E46 M3, Lab22 Built Turbo S54, Bend Calibration Tuned - BMW Half Mile Record Holder
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2021, 02:20 PM   #51
FriedPiston
Colonel
United_States
1973
Rep
2,711
Posts

Drives: Scraper
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: East Oakland, CA

iTrader: (26)

Just by looking at your baseline map, you can already see something isn't right with the timing corrections in Cylinders 2, 4, 5

Peak ignition advance looks to be 16.5 * at high RPMs. Peak boost target also looks to be at 28 psi at high RPMs before tapering to 26.
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 1
      07-30-2021, 02:24 PM   #52
Commanderwiggin
Major
Commanderwiggin's Avatar
2050
Rep
1,200
Posts

Drives: M2C - X3M - Turbo E46 M3 - 45E
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SOCAL

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FriedPiston View Post
Just by looking at your baseline map, you can already see something isn't right with the timing corrections in Cylinders 2, 4, 5

Peak ignition advance looks to be 16.5 * at high RPMs. Peak boost target also looks to be at 28 psi at high RPMs before tapering to 26.
Yup likely all that KR related to poor fueling.
__________________
575RWHP F87 M2C - ECUTEK RACEROM with flex fuel tuning by Bend Calibration
1000+RWHP E46 M3, Lab22 Built Turbo S54, Bend Calibration Tuned - BMW Half Mile Record Holder
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2021, 02:26 PM   #53
FriedPiston
Colonel
United_States
1973
Rep
2,711
Posts

Drives: Scraper
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: East Oakland, CA

iTrader: (26)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commanderwiggin View Post
Yup likely all that KR related to poor fueling.
Gotta flow test those PI injectors on a regular basis...
Appreciate 1
      07-30-2021, 02:44 PM   #54
StockM4
Lieutenant
No_Country
171
Rep
447
Posts

Drives: BMW M3
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: new york

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FriedPiston View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commanderwiggin View Post
Yup likely all that KR related to poor fueling.
Gotta flow test those PI injectors on a regular basis...
Dont the injectors in the BMP kit come flow tested already…?
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2021, 02:50 PM   #55
FriedPiston
Colonel
United_States
1973
Rep
2,711
Posts

Drives: Scraper
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: East Oakland, CA

iTrader: (26)

Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
Dont the injectors in the BMP kit come flow tested already…?
Pretty sure most are flow tested/flow matched, or at least that's what the vendors claim. I've yet to actually see an injector test sheet/card being sent with Bosch injectors.

However, your obligations to test the injectors on a regular basis doesn't end at the time you place an order; PI injectors aren't immune to failure after all.

Race car things = race car maintenance
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2021, 02:56 PM   #56
StockM4
Lieutenant
No_Country
171
Rep
447
Posts

Drives: BMW M3
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: new york

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FriedPiston View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
Dont the injectors in the BMP kit come flow tested already…?
Pretty sure most are flow tested/flow matched, or at least that's what the vendors claim. I've yet to actually see an injector test sheet/card being sent with Bosch injectors.

However, your obligations to test the injectors on a regular basis doesn't end at the time you place an order; PI injectors aren't immune to failure after all.

Race car things = race car maintenance
So whats the alternative to running full e85 with pi or meth on upgraded turbos. Pi sounds like a damn headache.
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2021, 02:56 PM   #57
MJ6
Lieutenant
MJ6's Avatar
United_States
964
Rep
552
Posts

Drives: 2018 M4 ZCP 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2018 BMW M4 ZCP  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
Also i ask this, so if i had a motiv reflex would this have not happened…?
Im planning to do PI again so need to know.. unless there's a safer option on how to run FULL E85 on upgraded turbos without meth or pi
Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
So whats the alternative to running full e85 with pi or meth on upgraded turbos. Pi sounds like a damn headache.
Sorry to hear about the engine and the problems your experiencing man; PI can be great, but from what I've read it can also be tricky to dial in properly given the addition of new variables as points of potential failure.

I was on the fence about going the PI route myself as I'm on upgraded turbos as well and wanted the option to go full E85. The route I eventually took was upgrading the stock injectors to EU5's while also upgrading the HPFP system through Bosch Engineering's fuel-cam lifter upgrade. This may be putting the cart in front of the horse as I'm scheduled for the E85 dyno tune next Tuesday, but in theory it should be safer as it runs entirely off of the stock DME (along with all its fail-safe protocols) as opposed to relying on an external source such as an AIC.

Either way you end up going man, I hope it all gets worked out for you.
Appreciate 1
StockM4170.50
      07-30-2021, 03:04 PM   #58
FriedPiston
Colonel
United_States
1973
Rep
2,711
Posts

Drives: Scraper
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: East Oakland, CA

iTrader: (26)

Quote:
Originally Posted by StockM4 View Post
So whats the alternative to running full e85 with pi or meth on upgraded turbos. Pi sounds like a damn headache.
Depends on your goal. Commanderwiggin made some good pointers in his previous posts. Do some research on what each one of those items mean, then you'll be able to have a better understanding of what's best for your situation.

To be clear, PI isn't the issue. It's just that when you add non-factory items in order to push almost double the power, additional upkeep and monitoring will be required in order to prolong the life of the engine.

Having a fully built engine also doesn't make your setup immune to failure. I've seen those blow, albeit at slightly higher power levels. There are a lot of factors that go into making power, and then there's making safe power that will last thousands of miles.
Appreciate 0
      07-31-2021, 11:22 AM   #59
NickPJT
New Member
NickPJT's Avatar
United_States
112
Rep
28
Posts

Drives: 2022 M3 COMPETITION
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Just my opinion.


First of all, I'm sorry that your car blew up and that really sucks bro, but it is part of the game.

Now, please don't modify your car especially to this extent if you can't handle the fact that it may blow up regardless of the tuner. I've seen stage 2 E85 S55's blow up with perfect-looking logs.. shit happens. Not everyone is going to have the same experience as all motors are different and all setups are different, especially, when you add a port injection system to the mix. Port injection is cool and all, but it comes with so many issues and risks that the tuner just can't control. Sure he can tell you the issues are there, but that's about it. It's really up to you to fix them, unfortunately, you did not have the chance. Just because someone's car last's for "years" on a setup like this doesn't mean yours will too, also, I find it hard to believe that many s55s would last for years on a setup like this regardless of the tuner.

Let's take a peek at your logs, I see in the base map that there was a very slight variance in the STFTs, although, this is not perfect it didn't look bad in your logs. In your 1st revision from Paul, I see that the variance increased quite a bit, note this is out of Paul's control and is entirely related to an issue arising with your port injection system which was already showing signs of happening, although it wasn't anything too out of this world on your 1st log also, I notice there is absolutely no knock detected in your first log, however, on the blown motor log it started to knock quite a bit which I imagine is from the failure starting to happen. at 28 psi and the timing you're running this is unlikely and Paul was most definitely not pushing your car too hard.. most people go up to 30 PSI on a setup like yours with a lot more ignition timing up top from what I've seen browsing the forums and reading friends logs for years.

Your turbos weren't working hard at all and your car wasn't making very much timing.. again not being pushed very hard at all. Based on your STFT variance being so large I'd say this failure is definitely related to that, however, I think you just got really unlucky with this setup as I can assure you that your car was not being pushed hard in this log.. trust me I've seen cars on your setup being pushed hard making a lot more timing and boost.

Also, I noticed that your timing was rather rough in these logs which could definitely be related to having sub-par E85 in the car which would also cause your STFT's to get even more out of line with the PI system.

I'm not quite sure why you were telling people you had 32 PSI on the 1st revision as that was most definitely not the case, in your logs I see high 27-s to mid 28 PSI max, and the 32 psi you saw was on the shift and put no load or stress on the turbos.

Also, of course, other tuners are going to say they see an issue with your logs regardless of if it's Paul's fault or not. They all want to make money, so take what they say with a grain of salt when it comes to blaming other tuners for things. I don't think there are many tuners out there with more experience regarding the S55 engine than F80Paul, and, he would've never sent you to an unsafe territory on the first revision.

Maybe next time before making a forum post completely frying a tuner you should learn how to read your logs and understand what went wrong with your car, also, please try and understand that stuff can go wrong when you modify a car before going onto a forum and putting someone's reputation on the line over something like this is ridiculous after reviewing your situation.

Last edited by NickPJT; 07-31-2021 at 11:38 AM.. Reason: mistype
Appreciate 3
Wanted_M759.00
TopJimmy5457.00
sly1types431.50
      07-31-2021, 12:14 PM   #60
Wanted_M
Captain
Wanted_M's Avatar
United_States
759
Rep
950
Posts

Drives: Frozen Blue M4CS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Norcal

iTrader: (2)

All of us had to literally extract mod list from OP as he wasn't forthcoming from multiple post just casting blame.. Good info and feedback here, I'm even writing shit down lol.
__________________
M4CS Frozen Blue
ARM DP's/Resonated Mid-pipe | SPL links | Hotchkis bars | JRZ RS2/camber plates | K&N | Koyorad HX | Powerflex purple | Rouge | Spiegler | Speed Eng. snorkel | Vargas CBC/hub | Wagner IC | xHP | Xpel stealth ppf
Appreciate 2
TopJimmy5457.00
NickPJT111.50
      07-31-2021, 01:14 PM   #61
ghost.f82
Private
44
Rep
68
Posts

Drives: BMW M4 Comp
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

I personally run 16.5 degrees @ nearly 33 psi with no drama. When pushing these cars you need to know how to read the logs and have the proper kit.

In my case Fuel it stage 4, ID injectors and the reflex take care of the pi. I do wish Bm3 would integrate the reflex's ability to trigger limp.

Paul has been my tuner for years and I've had no problems. I do run a kill tune from him, but i explicitly asked him for it and new the risks.
__________________
IG: Ghost.F82
780whp Stock Block - F80Paul Tuned
4.52 100-200
201mph standing mile
Appreciate 3
TopJimmy5457.00
NickPJT111.50
davyent10.50
      08-01-2021, 02:16 AM   #62
hellokitty
Brigadier General
hellokitty's Avatar
United_States
2896
Rep
3,726
Posts

Drives: '17 M3 ZCP DCT
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Southern California

iTrader: (2)

Agreed!

I would highly recommend that people who are rather "novice" to modifying cars for horsepower stick with tried and true set ups and lay off the upgraded turbos, port injection and meth injection. The population that is interested in this level of power is minor, so the R&D budget that goes into these setups is limited. Just because a shop car can make 700-800 whp on a stock block doesn't mean the masses should be chasing after the same goals. Shops build these cars for credibility and see it as an investment for return of capital. Right now, the technology for integration of supplemental fueling has caught up, but it's not ready for the masses, yet. Everyone is basically a beta tester at this point.

It took me years on the N54 platform to understand the obsessed level of maintenance, reading of data logs, and troubleshooting to really appreciate the level of effort that goes into building a car that makes 150-200whp above factory reliably.

Stay safe and know your limits (including a having repair budget - no your 4 year warranty isn't going to cut it). Cut all of your maintenance intervals in half and track the hell out of it to make sure nothing gets overlooked. I have a maintenance spreadsheet for every car I have starting from 0 miles.

Is there is a problem with your car, STOP and fix it completely before driving it again.

I don't like to rant on forums, but if I can save one person from blowing up their engine, then it is worth it.
__________________
2017 F80 M3 ZCP / AA GESI DPs / Akrapovic Evo / BBS FI-R 19" / Bend Calibration ECUTEK Flex Fuel | Bilstein B16 DDC + CS EDC / BMC Filters / BMS OCC / CSF HE / ESS CP / Nitto NT555R2 / PD Crank Hub / SPL Suspension / Uniden R7 / Wagner Top Mount IC

2021 Mini GP3 / BMC Filters / BM3 / Cary Jordan E30 / Wagner IC / Remus Race
Appreciate 6
TopJimmy5457.00
Wanted_M759.00
NickPJT111.50
davyent10.50
      03-07-2022, 03:51 PM   #63
M4Viper
Private
M4Viper's Avatar
United_States
73
Rep
98
Posts

Drives: 2018 BMW M4 ZCP
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Drag Strip

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commanderwiggin View Post
First revision was less boost and you probably have a fuel-it stage w/e setup that isn't properly setup with a split sec aic controller?
- Fuel pressure was likely rising rate so it would've ramped up and caused the factory ekp to try and ramp down to control fuel pressure at target...then it would've ramped right back because there would be a drastic dip in fuel pressure (this likely would've happened several times and this is hard to even see in most logs due to logging frequency)
- The fuel-it fuelab regulators are pretty trash and don't regulate very well when compared to the PR stuff...not to mention pr stuff is half the cost. BUT regardless of this the base pressure needs to be setup properly to avoid the issue above.
- The port injection plate o-rings are consistently a point of failure during install...unsure if related to specific company/o-rings/design/etc... but an EOS manifold will always negate this issue.
- The bosch injectors aren't necessarily flow balanced like an Injector Dynamics ID1050X injector by example.
- The AIC controller is like trying to control your cars fueling with squirt gun built off windows 95 (playing minesweeper as a good analogy).

With a bump in one calibration...from your base cal which was fine to a single new calibration which was demanding more from your compromised setup; it's an unfortunate thing really. Both parties could've done more to prevent this issue but in this case the tuner seems to have provided all the services that they are required to and this looks like a hardware setup issue which is unfortunate for you because in this case you seem like you just wanted a fast car and shouldn't be expected to know everything there is to know about fuel delivery...it's a tough spot. So in a nutshell it broke, and now you fix it/sell it/etc... but I hope I've helped you identify some of the possible issues and things to look at so this can be avoided for you (or someone else) in the future.
Commanderwiggin
I’m in the process of changing the Fuel-It FPR.
Fuel-It stated to set the Fuel-Lab FPR to 65psi on idle.
What’s your advice to set FPR to?
TIA

Last edited by M4Viper; 03-07-2022 at 06:11 PM..
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2022, 01:16 PM   #64
calicruisin
Private First Class
20
Rep
189
Posts

Drives: Eff80
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M4Viper View Post
Commanderwiggin
I’m in the process of changing the Fuel-It FPR.
Fuel-It stated to set the Fuel-Lab FPR to 65psi on idle.
What’s your advice to set FPR to?
TIA
What calibrator are you working with ? Typically they will have you set it to a particular level.

Cheers
Appreciate 0
      03-23-2022, 01:16 PM   #65
davyent
New Member
davyent's Avatar
Ghana
11
Rep
26
Posts

Drives: 15' BMW F80 M3
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Ghana

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lightfurym2c View Post

First of all, I'm sorry that your car blew up and that really sucks bro, but it is part of the game.

Now, please don't modify your car especially to this extent if you can't handle the fact that it may blow up regardless of the tuner. I've seen stage 2 E85 S55's blow up with perfect-looking logs.. shit happens. Not everyone is going to have the same experience as all motors are different and all setups are different, especially, when you add a port injection system to the mix. Port injection is cool and all, but it comes with so many issues and risks that the tuner just can't control. Sure he can tell you the issues are there, but that's about it. It's really up to you to fix them, unfortunately, you did not have the chance. Just because someone's car last's for "years" on a setup like this doesn't mean yours will too, also, I find it hard to believe that many s55s would last for years on a setup like this regardless of the tuner.

Let's take a peek at your logs, I see in the base map that there was a very slight variance in the STFTs, although, this is not perfect it didn't look bad in your logs. In your 1st revision from Paul, I see that the variance increased quite a bit, note this is out of Paul's control and is entirely related to an issue arising with your port injection system which was already showing signs of happening, although it wasn't anything too out of this world on your 1st log also, I notice there is absolutely no knock detected in your first log, however, on the blown motor log it started to knock quite a bit which I imagine is from the failure starting to happen. at 28 psi and the timing you're running this is unlikely and Paul was most definitely not pushing your car too hard.. most people go up to 30 PSI on a setup like yours with a lot more ignition timing up top from what I've seen browsing the forums and reading friends logs for years.

Your turbos weren't working hard at all and your car wasn't making very much timing.. again not being pushed very hard at all. Based on your STFT variance being so large I'd say this failure is definitely related to that, however, I think you just got really unlucky with this setup as I can assure you that your car was not being pushed hard in this log.. trust me I've seen cars on your setup being pushed hard making a lot more timing and boost.

Also, I noticed that your timing was rather rough in these logs which could definitely be related to having sub-par E85 in the car which would also cause your STFT's to get even more out of line with the PI system.

I'm not quite sure why you were telling people you had 32 PSI on the 1st revision as that was most definitely not the case, in your logs I see high 27-s to mid 28 PSI max, and the 32 psi you saw was on the shift and put no load or stress on the turbos.

Also, of course, other tuners are going to say they see an issue with your logs regardless of if it's Paul's fault or not. They all want to make money, so take what they say with a grain of salt when it comes to blaming other tuners for things. I don't think there are many tuners out there with more experience regarding the S55 engine than F80Paul, and, he would've never sent you to an unsafe territory on the first revision.

Maybe next time before making a forum post completely frying a tuner you should learn how to read your logs and understand what went wrong with your car, also, please try and understand that stuff can go wrong when you modify a car before going onto a forum and putting someone's reputation on the line over something like this is ridiculous after reviewing your situation.
If the tuner gradually increased boost by 1-2 psi with each revision and over time, am sure he would have been able to detect the problem long before the boost got to 31 psi and the appropriate intervention would have been initiated. 31 psi from 26 psi was a big leap.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST