10-27-2020, 12:45 PM | #23 |
Second Lieutenant
149
Rep 289
Posts |
Apologize for previous post (deleted)
I had reversed the explanation for the front wheels! So this is what I am thinking of ordering (pic below) 19 x 9.5 ET22 with 275/30 tires front. 19x 10.5 ET45 with 305/30 tires rear. If you go to the 19 x 10 ET25 front you need 5mm spacer and might need negative camber. The 19 x 11 ET44 rear wheel is only available in SM10 style and there is no ET22 in SM10. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2020, 01:38 PM | #24 |
///M Powered for Life
11480
Rep 10,328
Posts |
I would definitely go with the 5mm spacer to enable the 10" option.
BMWs have engines up front. You want as much wheel/tire as possible there The EC7 design is too heavy |
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2020, 02:06 PM | #25 | |
Second Lieutenant
149
Rep 289
Posts |
Quote:
Also the SM-10 is about the same weight and is the only Apex option for 19 x 10 front, 19 x 11 rear at least at this time. This is what Apex recommended with the caveat that I would need a front spacer and could run into fender clearance issues since I don't have camber plates. A friend of mine has a set of 19 x 10.5 ET22 rear and 19 x 10 ET25 front in ARC-8 style, might see if we can do a test fit (would need 20mm rear spacer). When I get things figured out I will post back |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2020, 02:12 PM | #26 | |
///M Powered for Life
11480
Rep 10,328
Posts |
Quote:
You would do much better with OEM wheels and camber plates than a 'track setup' without them. Apex is notoriously conservative with their fitment guides. Careful with your example of the ARC8 wheels. The ET22 rear wheel is way too aggressive for the F8X. The 10.5 fitment should be ET36 or ET40 and the 11 fitment is ET44. A 10.5ET22 wheel won't work with wide tires. You also cannot correct aggressive wheel offsets with a spacer. Low ET = the wheel it towards the 'outside' of the car. So if you have a ET22 wheel and you add a 10mm spacer you now have a ET12 wheel which doesn't work at all. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2020, 02:15 PM | #27 | ||
Second Lieutenant
149
Rep 289
Posts |
Quote:
Looks like Ground Control still selling the GTS plates. How difficult are they to install? |
||
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2020, 02:17 PM | #28 | |
///M Powered for Life
11480
Rep 10,328
Posts |
Quote:
If you do it yourself, make sure to start by covering the positive terminal in the engine bay with tape. It's in the perfect position to short out with a wrench and fry your ECU |
|
Appreciate
1
h_bakken148.50 |
10-27-2020, 02:17 PM | #29 | ||
Second Lieutenant
149
Rep 289
Posts |
Quote:
Ahhh this makes sense, thank you! I knew my thinking was not right. So there is no way the wheels that my friend has would work, that is helpful! |
||
Appreciate
1
SYT_Shadow11479.50 |
10-27-2020, 02:26 PM | #30 |
///M Powered for Life
11480
Rep 10,328
Posts |
happy to help. I track a lot and have a massive collection of wheels, camber plates, BBK, etc
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2020, 03:01 PM | #31 |
Lieutenant
333
Rep 471
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
SYT_Shadow11479.50 |
10-27-2020, 06:01 PM | #32 | ||
Second Lieutenant
149
Rep 289
Posts |
Quote:
I'm sure there are a lot of people who would argue all night about this but it makes sense to me when I think of it this way. I am going to end up with camber plates after all, want to do it right. |
||
Appreciate
1
SYT_Shadow11479.50 |
11-18-2020, 07:39 AM | #33 |
Bored all the time
382
Rep 2,173
Posts |
Anyone here with the CF 681M Wheels? I found a set for "decent" price... I know these were an option for the GTS because of its lightness... just not sure how they would look on a white GTS...
I had Carbon Fiber wheels on my GT350R and although they are beautiful, the fact that if you curb them by accident, you're out of $5k for each HA! I found this thread with some pics of them, if you're not familiar what they look like: https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1426197 EDIT: I found this old ad as well... I'm not sure i'm digging this look... https://www.lamborghinidallas.com/us...d38df20f95.htm
__________________
Current: 2014 991 Turbo RS
Past: 15 GT3, 17 R8 SC, Two 16 M4 GTS’s, Two 18 GT350R's, Two 13 RS5’s, 13 M3, 10 R8, 15 M4, 09 M3, 04 M3, 09 S5, 02 M3... It all started with an RX-7 (FD). Last edited by Boostin FD; 11-18-2020 at 07:44 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2020, 08:57 AM | #34 | |
Second Lieutenant
149
Rep 289
Posts |
Quote:
That being said anything you can reduce unsprung weight is generally good. Also thanks to Lambo Dallas for supporting M4 GTS prices |
|
Appreciate
1
786347.50 |
11-18-2020, 09:36 AM | #35 |
Private First Class
153
Rep 132
Posts |
Here's a previous thread where M4 GTS owners were experiencing 'scoring' issues with the front 19" CF wheels.
https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1466182 From memory, 20" CF wheels (front and back) were, or are still, not a problem on the M4 GTS. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2020, 10:19 AM | #36 |
First Lieutenant
415
Rep 366
Posts |
I would much rather have BBS FI-Rs. Look way better and are actually lighter than the M CF wheels.
Stock GTS wheels weigh just over 104lb total. Carbon GTS wheels are just under 90lb total. FI-R in OEM GTS size are 68lb (!) - an enormous weight savings. FI-R are 20 pounds lighter than the 681M carbon wheels, can be repaired, and are generally cheaper. |
Appreciate
1
786347.50 |
11-18-2020, 10:48 AM | #37 | |
Bored all the time
382
Rep 2,173
Posts |
Quote:
I've looked at a lot of pictures... they're just plain ugly looking wheels. So, pass! I understand the point of them and all... but i'm a poser... i prefer looks over function
__________________
Current: 2014 991 Turbo RS
Past: 15 GT3, 17 R8 SC, Two 16 M4 GTS’s, Two 18 GT350R's, Two 13 RS5’s, 13 M3, 10 R8, 15 M4, 09 M3, 04 M3, 09 S5, 02 M3... It all started with an RX-7 (FD). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2020, 10:50 AM | #38 | |
Bored all the time
382
Rep 2,173
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2014 991 Turbo RS
Past: 15 GT3, 17 R8 SC, Two 16 M4 GTS’s, Two 18 GT350R's, Two 13 RS5’s, 13 M3, 10 R8, 15 M4, 09 M3, 04 M3, 09 S5, 02 M3... It all started with an RX-7 (FD). |
|
Appreciate
1
h_bakken148.50 |
11-18-2020, 02:20 PM | #39 | |
Major
1268
Rep 1,287
Posts |
Quote:
Wheels should be assessed not by weight alone, but also stiffness and strength. BBS FI-Rs are at the top of the food chain not only in mass (reduction of), but in radial/axial deflection and durability. Heck, Bugatti OEMs them for the multi-million euro Chiron. $8K might seem like a higher-ish priced ticket to get in the game (imho, it really isn't given how much HRE charges for what little motorsport R&D they have in-house), but consider resale value and 2nd hand demand which definitely weigh in on the buying equation. I bought my set at $8.2K new and sold it years later for $6K cash lickety-split.
__________________
Dry sump flat six
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2020, 08:18 PM | #40 | ||
First Lieutenant
348
Rep 316
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
IG: @iivvx
Current: ‘18 GT3 Sold: ‘18 M2, '11 M3, '16 GT4, '11 GT500 (850hp), '16 M4 GTS, '85 3.2 Carrera, '07 911 Turbo, '09 & '07 Z06, '08 IS-F, '03 & '02 WRX, like 5 Miatas, '00 Si |
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2020, 10:36 PM | #41 | ||
First Lieutenant
415
Rep 366
Posts |
Quote:
The FI-Rs are (to me) better in every way. Repairable if you bend them, lighter, look better (admittedly subjective), cheaper, and easier to source a replacement if you really mess one up. That said, if you find carbon 681Ms for like $4k, why not? It's the only real option these cars had (aside from paint) here in the US. Quote:
Last edited by 4play; 11-18-2020 at 10:42 PM.. |
||
Appreciate
1
786347.50 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|