02-05-2025, 01:23 PM | #1 |
Major
![]() 461
Rep 1,075
Posts |
Are OTS maps inherently lean? (log included)
So I ran a log the other day on my BM3 CS+ map and I noticed the AFR is pretty lean lower in the powerband, but I also notice its hitting the AFR target consistently and both banks are even, so I'm wondering if I have an issue or if PTF just runs them that way?
I sent them a log and they responded that it's bad quality fuel. Sure, CA is terrible, but my ACN91 has at least 25% Sunoco 100 in it. Also, fuel quality shouldn't affect lean/rich. **Log not included, I made a mistake ![]() |
02-05-2025, 01:45 PM | #3 | |
Major
![]() 461
Rep 1,075
Posts |
Quote:
EDIT: I understand that fuel quality affects timing, I'm speaking specifically about AFR. Last edited by theweebabySeamus; 02-05-2025 at 01:58 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-05-2025, 02:47 PM | #4 |
Private First Class
![]() 119
Rep 199
Posts
Drives: 2016 BMW M4
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Midwest USA
|
It should be ~14.7 except under enrichment at WOT where it will be more rich (around 12.5-13.0 AFR)
It will always swing lean/rich as staying perfectly at 14.7 is impossible. These cars use lambda for fueling, so regardless of stoichiometry of the current fuel in the tank you should always see somewhere around 14.7 on a basic AFR gauge. Post a log. Last edited by Jaizero; 02-05-2025 at 02:59 PM.. |
Appreciate
1
theweebabySeamus460.50 |
02-05-2025, 03:47 PM | #5 | |
Major
![]() 461
Rep 1,075
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-05-2025, 08:29 PM | #6 |
Major
![]() 597
Rep 1,181
Posts
Drives: 2015 BMW X1 35i M-sport
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Twin Cities MN
|
Yes, that certainly could be normal per the tune, the tune adjusts AFR target based on load% and rpm. If actual aligns with target I wouldn't worry. For reference, here's some n55 fuel maps from a different thread (anjuna's n55 tuning thread). I've read that a lot of OTS maps will run a little leaner than stock, but it depends on the tuner and what tradeoffs they're shooting for.
|
Appreciate
1
theweebabySeamus460.50 |
02-06-2025, 02:23 PM | #7 | |
Private First Class
![]() 119
Rep 199
Posts
Drives: 2016 BMW M4
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Midwest USA
|
Quote:
When you are logging make sure you log "actual" and "target". This way you will know if the car is doing what it's told to do. I have a post floating around somewhere on here that shows what you should be logging to get the best information. There are others with similar dashboard setups as me, just search if you have any questions. |
|
Appreciate
1
theweebabySeamus460.50 |
02-06-2025, 02:25 PM | #8 | |
Private First Class
![]() 119
Rep 199
Posts
Drives: 2016 BMW M4
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Midwest USA
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
theweebabySeamus460.50 |
02-06-2025, 03:38 PM | #10 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 714
Rep 778
Posts |
BM3 off the shelf tunes are terrible. Heard from multiple shops in the SoCal area who have reported the same thing. Lean AFR, timing pulls, HPFP crashing.
MHD OTS are much, MUCH better
__________________
2006 Z4 M Roadster Black/Imola Red, FBO VF-Engineering, e85 Flex Fuel-Sold
2012 BMW 135i N55 DCT Alpine White/Coral Red, FBO, TBI, Full e85, JB4 BEF-Sold 2006 Z4 M Roadster Black/Black-Sold 2021 M2 Competition DCT Hockenheim Silver |
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2025, 04:46 PM | #11 |
Major
![]() 461
Rep 1,075
Posts |
Odd, I just reviewed an MHD log and the target AFR was similar to BM3...but the car ran a little richer.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|