ARMA SPEED
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Forum > M3/M4 versus...

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-06-2013, 04:41 PM   #111
johndeere
mhmmmm
Canada
136
Rep
633
Posts

Drives: MS3X
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (2)

Do people really cross shop these? I mean I would LOVE and am planning on getting into the new m3 in a couple of years. It's I think the only car within this price range I'd consider. The Mustang would never even come remotely close to my list of cars. Perhaps it's just me. Perhaps a vote should be set up to see how many would cross-shop a mustang and an m4?
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 04:44 PM   #112
mkoesel
Moderator
United_States
7506
Rep
19,370
Posts

Drives: No BMW for now
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanyam3 View Post
I highly doubt anybody that can afford an m3 or m4 will buy a mustang lol. The m3 is in a class of its own.
Some other things to highly doubt when you have down time:

A heart transplant
Quantum physics
Male ladybugs
An electric car
Dorito-flavored Tacos
Parkour
Ultraviolet light
Appreciate 1
      12-06-2013, 04:47 PM   #113
amanuuh
Colonel
amanuuh's Avatar
United_States
336
Rep
2,025
Posts

Drives: 2017 Audi R8
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Loma Linda, CA

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by reborn
I think that a true comparison for a GT is the 335. The M3 is a much more expensive car and should be compared to special models of the mustang.
The old 5.0 compares really well with the old m3 while being around the price of a well equipped 335. Now when you go to dealerships they have 335 f30s that cost 70 grand then add their 5 thousand dollar premium. The heck. The new m is probably going to be a good 100k which is around the gtr price. The new gt350/Mach 1 is going to be cheaper than some 335s. I don't get what BMW is thinking. Why would I but a 100k on an m3 for performance when I could get a GTR for a tiny bit more?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 04:55 PM   #114
Randy M
First Lieutenant
Randy M's Avatar
29
Rep
358
Posts

Drives: 2013 B302 LS
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 'Merika

iTrader: (0)

What I get out of many of these comments is that a guys identity, self image or what have you is mistakenly wrapped into the logo on their car.
__________________
'11 Porsche GT3 (Sold)
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 04:55 PM   #115
amanuuh
Colonel
amanuuh's Avatar
United_States
336
Rep
2,025
Posts

Drives: 2017 Audi R8
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Loma Linda, CA

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanyam3
I highly doubt anybody that can afford an m3 or m4 will buy a mustang lol. The m3 is in a class of its own.
I just turned 23 last month. I drive a 335i. My dad drives a gl550. My dad owns a business and 8 houses. I own my own 7-Eleven.

By looking at all that I think I could afford an m3. My next car choices are a ZR1,2016 C63 ( or when ever the next gen one comes out), and a Mustang.

You should stop doubting things lol
__________________
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 04:57 PM   #116
amanuuh
Colonel
amanuuh's Avatar
United_States
336
Rep
2,025
Posts

Drives: 2017 Audi R8
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Loma Linda, CA

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rated R
What I get out of many of these comments is that a guys identity, self image or what have you is mistakenly wrapped into the logo on their car.
Totally agree with that
__________________
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 04:57 PM   #117
AMPowerJ
One mod leads to another ...
AMPowerJ's Avatar
United_States
415
Rep
2,900
Posts

Drives: 2014 F10 M5
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Blythewood, SC

iTrader: (10)

Quote:
Originally Posted by XtoM View Post
Looks nice but it's no comparison to either of it's benchmarking cars, it's a fast car but not a sports car, muscle cars don't cut it unless you live on a drag strip.
How do you know? It isn't out yet.
__________________

Current: 2014 F10 M5
Previous: 2015 F80 M3, 2013 E92 M3, 2013 F10 M5, 2009 E90 M3, 1998 E36 M3
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:05 PM   #118
s4awd
Lieutenant
285
Rep
547
Posts

Drives: 11 GT3RS, 08 E92 M3, 06 Evo IX
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

I went from an e92 M3 to an F10 M5 and have a 14 GT500. The interior is cheap but man, it's such a fun car that feels like it actually has 662hp. It's insane and makes my other cars feel as if something is wrong with them after driving the mustang. I'm actually concerned that they will tame this newer one too much and take the fun out of it.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:08 PM   #119
pgviper
Captain
United_States
278
Rep
823
Posts

Drives: X3m40
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island, NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by XtoM View Post
Looks nice but it's no comparison to either of it's benchmarking cars, it's a fast car but not a sports car, muscle cars don't cut it unless you live on a drag strip.
Are you living under a rock???

Some of the best handling track cars are "muscle cars".

I'm a chevy guy but I can't wait to check out one of these new mustangs!!!
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:14 PM   #120
pgviper
Captain
United_States
278
Rep
823
Posts

Drives: X3m40
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island, NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BwoodBMW View Post
yes to be clear... Ford was trying to compete with performance, not necessarily refinement. For a car who's base price will be in the low 20's I think this is going to be great. The GT looks hot, allegedly has lost more than 200 lbs and gains IRS. And people who have actually sat in it say the interior is lightyears better than the last car. I don't think there is much to complain about with this thing. Unless you are an E92M3 owner that has a problem with a much cheaper car keeping up with you.
+1
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:20 PM   #121
SamS
Banned
United_States
866
Rep
6,248
Posts

Drives: Tesla M3 Perf + '18 X3 M40i
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (0)

Looks good, and will hang against E9x or F8x M3 around the track, mark my words!

But gawd, that terrible interior!
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:30 PM   #122
3M TAPE
Banned
3M TAPE's Avatar
No_Country
350
Rep
1,225
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: States

iTrader: (0)

The numbers might be close but the experience will never be the same,
Do I ever compare a 911 to a E92/E90 M3?
No, because the driving feel/experience is totally different.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:33 PM   #123
Alumac
First Lieutenant
92
Rep
380
Posts

Drives: prudently
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanyam3 View Post
I highly doubt anybody that can afford an m3 or m4 will buy a mustang lol. The m3 is in a class of its own.
Actually, the people that can more than afford an M3/4 will be shopping the new Mustang. The ones that need leases to keep up appearances, probably not so much.

But that's how the rich get richer. They shop around, whether it's a car or a TV.

While an M badge is nice. It ultimately means nothing to this crowd. For those that can't actually afford the car, it means everything.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:39 PM   #124
Remonster
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
821
Rep
1,583
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by conradb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Remonster View Post
The current Mustang can keep up with an M3, but the handling is not even close. Bear in mind that there's a LOT more to handling than skidpad numbers and lap times, I've driven every year of the fifth gen Mustang (2005-2013) and pretty much every engine they offer (3.7 V6, 4.6 V8, 5.0 V8, a couple of the earlier GT500s) and they all have basically the same handling characteristics; very lazy steering with almost no feel, very soft springs and dampers, tons of rubber in the suspension, etc. They're just sloppy cars, you can throw them into a corner and they will generate enough grip to go through very quickly but you don't feel the road at all and can't really tell how close you are to the limit. That live rear axle (which is gone now) isn't as bad as some say but it still has some very annoying characteristics, chief among them is the huge weight of the rear diff and axle hanging off of the suspension which means that even though the suspension is very soft, it still crashes and makes the body wobble when you hit a bump and hitting a bump mid-corner makes the whole car bounce. The earlier fifth gen GTs with the 4.6 were worse than the 5.0s, in the last few years Ford started offering the track pack and a couple other options that went a long way towards improving the way the Mustang drove. The 2013 GT Track Pack I drove was pretty good as long as the road was fairly smooth.

They're definitely not bad cars, I think the current 5.0 GT is one of the most fun cars you can get for the money and the motor is just epic but it has some serious handling issues. It looks like Ford is very serious with this new car, though. I can't wait to try it out.
I swear it's as though you have never seen this test:



I own an E92 M3, and I love it, but I'm realistic when I say the Mustang GT is on par with performance against the M3. The only thing I wish the Mustang had was a DCT. I've driven the new 2014 Mustang. It doesn't quite have the tight finesse in the steering, but that's a minor fault.
I'm not talking about how fast the Mustang is, I'm using the term handling in reference to steering precision and feel, spring/damper tuning, the effects of the heavy rear axle and diff acting as unsprung weight, etc. things you have to sit inside the car to feel and I've driven at least a dozen 2005+ Mustangs, sometimes very hard, so I speak from my personal experience.

Did you notice that the guy who actually owned a 2011 GT agreed with my assessment of the fifth gen's handling?

Anyways this is all pointless now, the new car has totally different suspension geometry front and rear (the big news is IRS out back but don't forget it's also getting MacPherson struts in front like a BMW) and a totally different chassis so nothing I'm talking about will carry over to this new car.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:43 PM   #125
///M ARMY
Brigadier General
1002
Rep
3,052
Posts

Drives: F90
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Cali

iTrader: (2)

doesn't look to bad at all. I like it
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:49 PM   #126
JoeFromPA
Colonel
1789
Rep
2,995
Posts

Drives: '15 AW M3 6MT Stripper
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SE PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Remonster View Post
I'm not talking about how fast the Mustang is, I'm using the term handling in reference to steering precision and feel, spring/damper tuning, the effects of the heavy rear axle and diff acting as unsprung weight, etc. things you have to sit inside the car to feel and I've driven at least a dozen 2005+ Mustangs, sometimes very hard, so I speak from my personal experience.
So your critique ultimately boiled down to your subjective opinion on "feel" and not on actual performance or ability to keep up on a track. Got it.

May I interest you in a 1973 911 RS?

Or perhaps a 1990 Miata?

Both of those offer world-leveling degrees of "feel" compared to a modern BMW 3-series.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:53 PM   #127
Ashley Schaeffer BMW
Banned
91
Rep
833
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Charlotte

iTrader: (1)

Wow, the M4 isnt even going to be on my radar next year now. BMW has really dropped the ball with this upcoming generation.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 05:59 PM   #128
Fraggy
Brigadier General
Fraggy's Avatar
United_States
193
Rep
3,469
Posts

Drives: 2016 M3
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (11)

It looks great! It's aimed at a different than M, but nothing wrong with that.
__________________
2016 Alpine White M3 (gone)
2019 Alfa Romeo Guilia (Totaled)
2020 Car-less 😁 (no more)
2020 M340
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 06:01 PM   #129
R N M
Colonel
R N M's Avatar
3620
Rep
2,048
Posts

Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 BMW M3  [0.00]
Loving the new Mustang styling esp the Fastback rear!!!!



The problem is the CHEAP interior is a big turnoff as well as the overall POOR build quality.

Look at those huge panels gaps and cheap plastics.
__________________
Current
2018 F80 ///M3 CompPack; 2020 BMW X3 M40i
2015 Subaru BRZ Series.Blue (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEBobwprGtA)
Previous: 2016 F80 ///M3; 2013 F10 535i MSport; 2012 F10 528i MSport; 2009 E92 335i MSport
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 06:02 PM   #130
swanson
Convicted Felon
swanson's Avatar
733
Rep
2,180
Posts

Drives: chariot
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY

iTrader: (0)

Lets compare the interiors of both the BMW F30 and the new Mustang





Do most of you complaining about the interior really think that BMW F30 interior looks better then the new Mustang interior? The M3/M4 interior will be identical to that 3 series interior besides different trim offerings and different steering wheel and seats.
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 06:03 PM   #131
BimmerQuest
Private First Class
BimmerQuest's Avatar
25
Rep
140
Posts

Drives: 2017 X5 35ix M-Sport MPPK
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: 5280

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alumac View Post
Actually, the people that can more than afford an M3/4 will be shopping the new Mustang. The ones that need leases to keep up appearances, probably not so much.

But that's how the rich get richer. They shop around, whether it's a car or a TV.

While an M badge is nice. It ultimately means nothing to this crowd. For those that can't actually afford the car, it means everything.


+1000
Appreciate 0
      12-06-2013, 06:06 PM   #132
basscadet
Lieutenant
basscadet's Avatar
166
Rep
444
Posts

Drives: 991.2 GT3
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Overland Park, KS

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rated R View Post
What I get out of many of these comments is that a guys identity, self image or what have you is mistakenly wrapped into the logo on their car.
Here here.

They should be ashamed of themselves. They're not enthusiasts, they're phonies.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2014 bmw m3, 2014 bmw m3 horsepower, 2014 bmw m3 specs, 2014 bmw m4 horsepower, 2014 bmw m4 specs, 2014 m3, 2014 m3 engine, 2014 m3 forum, 2014 m3 horsepower, 2014 m3 hp, 2014 m3 specs, 2014 m3 weight, 2014 m4 engine, 2014 m4 horsepower, 2014 m4 hp, 2014 m4 specs, 2014 m4 weight, 2015 bmw m3, 2015 bmw m3 specs, 2015 bmw m4, 2015 bmw m4 specs, 2015 m3, 2015 m3 engine, 2015 m3 specs, 2015 m4, 2015 m4 engine, 2015 m4 hp, 2015 m4 specs, 2015 m4 weight, bmw f80, bmw f80 forum, bmw f80 forums, bmw f80 m3, bmw f80 m3 s55, bmw f80 m3 sedan, bmw f82, bmw f82 forum, bmw f82 forums, bmw f82 m3 coupe, bmw f82 m4, bmw f82 m4 coupe, bmw f82 m4 s55, bmw f82 m4 video, bmw f83, bmw f83 m3, bmw f83 m4, bmw m forum, bmw m forums, bmw m3 forum, bmw m3 forums, bmw m3 s55, bmw m3 s55 engine, bmw m4, bmw m4 coupe, bmw m4 coupe forum, bmw m4 forum, bmw m4 forums, bmw m4 horsepower, bmw m4 weight, f80 m3, f82 m4, m4 versus mustang, m4 vs mustang, mustang versus m4, mustang vs m4

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST