08-11-2011, 01:39 PM | #24 |
Brigadier General
4287
Rep 4,848
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
I wouldn't be so quick to judge especially this early where so many things are still unknown. This is going to be exactly like the 1M. Everyone is going to bash it saying it's this and that, turbo this, turbo that and at the end, look at the reviews it's getting and how "M" it really is.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 01:40 PM | #25 |
Major General
3488
Rep 6,788
Posts
Drives: 2016 BMW i8
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Monarch Beach
iTrader: (1)
Garage List 2012 BMW e92 M3 [0.00]
2021 BMW X5M [10.00] 2015 Porsche 991 Tu ... [10.00] 2015 Porsche 991 GT3 [10.00] |
How does the OP know there is a tri-turbo inline 6 under the hood of this thing? The title of the thread seems to indicate such.
__________________
Current BMWs: 2022 X5 40i, 2016 X5 50i
2015 Porsche 991 Turbo S 1979 Porsche 911 Turbo (930) a couple others IG: longboarder949; YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT1...eoFBszPIK0gf9w |
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 01:42 PM | #26 |
Lieutenant
52
Rep 472
Posts
Drives: E90 LCI 328i|E70 LCI xDrive50i
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
|
The tail lights look bigger than what was rendered a while ago. I hope the rear lights wont be like the f10's
Or im just crazy
__________________
2013 VW Golf R | APR Stage 2+ 2015 BMW F06 640i xDrive | M Sport Edition | 20' Avant Garde M510 Retired 2009 E90 328i xDrive | M Sport | BMW Performance Grille, Intake, Exhaust, BBK | AA Stg 2 | 3 Stage Manifold | Bilstein Sport | Eibach Pro | OEM CF Spoiler | CF Lip | Alufelgen SF-71 |
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 01:43 PM | #28 | |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
Quote:
Turbo doesn't generate power from clear blue sky. The whole idea of the turbo is to have the power of a big engine (big engine=more air in the combustion chamber. Turbo pushes more air to a smaller combustion chamber) when you push the loud pedal. When you don't need power (ie, cruising) you have the efficiency of a small engine.
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 01:50 PM | #29 |
Lieutenant General
4992
Rep 10,212
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 718 SRS (on way)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Quick question--how do we know they're testing the tri-turbo in this mule?
Or is that just the current speculation?
__________________
Past rides: 2022 718 Spyder, 2022 MINI JCW, 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 01:53 PM | #30 |
Lieutenant General
4992
Rep 10,212
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 718 SRS (on way)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
You beat me to it.
__________________
Past rides: 2022 718 Spyder, 2022 MINI JCW, 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 01:54 PM | #31 |
Moderator / European Editor
1590
Rep 6,752
Posts |
If I told you I'd have to kill you.
Best regards, south
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 01:57 PM | #32 |
New Member
4
Rep 6
Posts |
That's funny I thought the same thing. I'm going to wait until I see more of the facts but as of right now I'm leaning towards the GT3 idea.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 01:58 PM | #33 |
Sameet
746
Rep 2,541
Posts
Drives: AY/B M4 '15
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Long Island, New York
|
Can't wait to trade in the 335i for this baby!
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:00 PM | #34 | |
Schumacher
801
Rep 2,289
Posts
Drives: E30 325is,E93 M3,X7M50,F06 M6
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lake Forest, IL
|
Quote:
I love that people have to show there knowledge just to show their knowledge. Point is the Turbo engines are more fuel efficient then their non turbo counterparts with the same power output. (Which is the same thing you just said and all I was posting about). So yes if you would like me to rephrase I know at WOT I am not picking up the efficiency. But overall I can flog the turbo engine the same as I would the non-turbo and acheive a higher overall MPG. Wow next time I wont make a comment without a scientific disertations and maybe a few references to the laws of physics in there as well.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:03 PM | #35 | |
(Sold) '00 M Roadster '06 M Coupe '16 M3 '20 X3MC
1638
Rep 2,605
Posts |
Quote:
The old 3.2L in the M3/M Roadster could get 330 HP without turbos, so it should easily hit 450HP with 2 large turbos (and a hairdryer). If they bring back the Sedan I will be first in line to buy one, otherwise I have no clue what my next 4 door compact will be (RS4 or next gen C63 I guess). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:04 PM | #36 | |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
Quote:
BTW, even if you are not WOT, still the same thing. if you need 150hp to accelerate, you will burn same amount of fuel whether NA or turbo or sc...
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:04 PM | #37 |
The power of V!
103
Rep 1,971
Posts
Drives: 2007 335i coupe steptronic
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1998 Lexus Gs400 [0.00]
2010 ebony & ivory [0.00] 2006 BMW X3 [0.00] 2009 pics [0.00] 2009 e92 335 xdrive [0.00] |
BMW does not delay or play when it comes to the product. Next M3 already in camo in sedan form.. NIce...
__________________
2007 335 coupe Alpine white, steptronic, sportpack, etc. (gone)
2006 X3 3.0 steptronic Titanium Silver, 2009 E92 335xdrive, next.... Caddy CTS_V! 13 Lincoln MKZ? hmmm. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:08 PM | #38 |
New Member
2
Rep 20
Posts |
hairdryer? hahaha that made my day
__________________
BusMetroWalking
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:12 PM | #39 | |
Schumacher
801
Rep 2,289
Posts
Drives: E30 325is,E93 M3,X7M50,F06 M6
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lake Forest, IL
|
Quote:
So you are telling me if you could push a car as hard as you want both being equal in performance, one gets 10mpg and one gets 30mpg you would say hmmm doesnt matter to me which one I have. The performance is the end all of what you want out of an M3, but it is also nice to have fuel economy as well. Remember the M3 is not a full on sports car, its also a DD for many people as well as it seats 4 with a large trunk.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:15 PM | #40 |
First Lieutenant
27
Rep 345
Posts |
Exciting news.. look forward to some more pics and videos and more info on the engine!
__________________
F48 X1| BSM| M-Sport |
Gone: E46 M3| Silver Grey | |
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:17 PM | #41 |
Captain
79
Rep 672
Posts |
I like that they're going back to an I6. Tri-turbo though, sounds ridiculously complex and like there will be minimal chance of it having the same longevity and low problem record of the S54, or the S65 for that matter. Murphy's law - and add more complex parts, Murphy will prevail....I'll hold my breath to see what is actually spec'd for the car and how it does for the first few years.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:17 PM | #42 | |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
Quote:
Again, if you push hard, both cars will get awful mpg... You will only have the benefit on freeway driving, and depending on you driving habits and commute, the new M3 may not be all that economical. It may not be justified to have 2more mpg and loose a high revving V8 masterpiece.. That's my whole point. Agreed on M3 is not a sports car.
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-11-2011, 02:19 PM | #44 | |
Schumacher
801
Rep 2,289
Posts
Drives: E30 325is,E93 M3,X7M50,F06 M6
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lake Forest, IL
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|