ARMA SPEED
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Forum > M3/M4 versus...

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-26-2012, 04:49 PM   #1
Mako
(Sold) '00 M Roadster '06 M Coupe '16 M3 '20 X3MC
1635
Rep
2,605
Posts

Drives: '23 M3 comp
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago suburbs

iTrader: (0)

M3/M4 vs W205 C63 AMG

just curious since most people here are M3 owners or fans (I am a fan of the M3 and all competition except the IS-F). Anyway, now that Mercedes has rolled out all the 5.5L Turbo V8s with their 63 AMG models (E, CLS, S) and even putting the same engine without turbo in the tiny SLK, I would have to believe they will put the turbo 5.5L in the next gen C63 (2014 or 2015 model year, same as next gen M3). Now it will probably be scaled down power wise just like the current C63 was compared to its bigger brothers, BUT I would imagine it still having more power than the current one, maybe 480 to start, and with the performance package getting the same 518 horsepower the E63/CLS63 have. The E63 is rated at 16/24 MPG with that engine (which is pretty amazing), so I would assume the C63 would get even better numbers. Also the current C63 coupe with performance package was tested at 3.7 seconds 0-60 (480 horsepower 6.3L engine). So with a lighter 5.5L engine and equal or more power I would assume that will stay the same.

Having said all that and Mercedes keeping the V8 (which sounds awesome) compared to BMW switching to a 6, would you guys still take the M3? My father has a current M3 and it is "different" to drive than my C63 but both cars are awesome in their own way. We both agreed for track driving the M3 is amazing, its a lot more nimble than the C63, but for everyday suburb driving the C63 is just a beast and fun to drive.

I was pretty set on getting the next gen M3 just based on the speculation of a 450 horsepower turbo (some form) i6 engine and assuming all German manufacturers would be going away from the V8, should be a great car to drive, but if I can get a V8 for the same price (or less) that is really tempting. Same goes with a possible future RS4/5 having a V8 turbo.

I really wish BMW would have just taken its 4.4L V8 turbo and juiced it up for the M3, that can easily put out 450+ horsepower, and to prove it look at the new X6 performance package, it has 440 horsepower with that engine! But I guess that would be stepping on the M5s toes.
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2012, 08:33 AM   #2
hwelvaar
Major
Belgium
118
Rep
1,140
Posts

Drives: BMW M135i MT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

A 5.5L engine costs like 4.000$ per year in taxes here in Belgium, and probably other European countries.
A 3.2 L would costs about 1.200$ per year in taxes.

Just for that, I'd have M3 over C63 AMG any day.

You Americans have the luck not having to worry about engine displacement. We do. And I guess BMW takes this into account as well when designing new cars.


And don't forget that 6-cylinder engines is what defines a great part of BMW's legacy, including multiple M3 generations.
Appreciate 0
      02-02-2012, 08:42 PM   #3
Paul-Bracq-BMW
Moderator
Paul-Bracq-BMW's Avatar
Australia
4119
Rep
1,973
Posts

Drives: 1981 323i, sports M5, LSD
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Also The inline6 turbo will have the same HP as a V8, the same amount of torque (if not higher) and will weigh less, making the car lighter and better balanced. You will have the best of both worlds with the new M3, and with the classic inline 6 sound to match!
__________________
1981 323i, 143 Kashmir-Metallic, 0094 Pergament, Sports M5, LSD.
Appreciate 0
      02-02-2012, 09:12 PM   #4
agentm
Private
agentm's Avatar
0
Rep
97
Posts

Drives: M3, X3
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everywhere

iTrader: (0)

MB NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
2004 M3 Silver Gray / CSL Header and Cats / RE El Diablo Exhaust / Hotchkis Swaybar / KW v2 / RD Sport Rims 19' / Falken FK-452 tires / Reinforcement Kit / Smoke Corner / 50% Tinted / Painted Shadow Grille / Umnitza Halo light / Hanman Lip / CF Diffusor / Autosolution SSK 30% / Aluminum Foot Pedals / AA Shift knob / AA Sport Fan Clutch / 3.91 Diff
Active Auto HKS Gen 6 Level 1.5 S/C
Appreciate 0
      09-03-2012, 09:36 PM   #5
yaymitch
Major
yaymitch's Avatar
United_States
1067
Rep
1,300
Posts

Drives: 2024 M3CS & 2022 RSQ8
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by agentm View Post
MB NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!
Why do you say this? Ever driven an AMG? I am okay with your opinion, but at least explain your reasoning. Or not...
__________________
2024 BMW M3CS
2022 Audi RSQ8
Appreciate 0
      09-04-2012, 01:39 AM   #6
Gjm127
Lieutenant
Gjm127's Avatar
United_States
40
Rep
544
Posts

Drives: BMW 435i xDrive M-Sport
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal, QC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
I'm in the same situation as you, but haven't yet experienced driving a V8 for everyday use.
I'm actually looking at getting an E92 M3 instead of the new generation M3 for my next car.
I want to experience this V8 M3 while it's still the current model.
Appreciate 0
      09-04-2012, 03:52 AM   #7
BMW269
Brigadier General
No_Country
443
Rep
3,888
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Germany

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul-Bracq-BMW View Post
Also The inline6 turbo will have the same HP as a V8, the same amount of torque (if not higher) and will weigh less, making the car lighter and better balanced. You will have the best of both worlds with the new M3, and with the classic inline 6 sound to match!
Wrong.
Appreciate 0
      09-04-2012, 09:40 AM   #8
Uli_HH
Lieutenant
Uli_HH's Avatar
Germany
108
Rep
585
Posts

Drives: AW M3 E90)/ 523i Touring
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamburg Germany

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levi View Post
Wrong.
+10!

Quote:
... will weigh less, making the car lighter and better balanced ...
Sorry, but only partly true if you compare an I6 Turbo with an V8 Turbo ... but not if you compare it with an N/A V8 ... I am pretty sure that the incoming "S55" won´t be any lighter than the S65 V8 - the S65 was an very light V8 with 202kg / the base N55 weights 190kg(?) plus make him stronger and add the TriTurbo-System from the N57S instead of the single TwinScroll-Turbo would bring this engine easily in the 200kg+ range.

And an I6 is allways much longer than an V8 so that in every case with an I6 much more weight is put further forward than with an V8 ... and that meen that in every case the same car is (easier) better balanced with an V8 than with an I6 ... thats the only truth.
Appreciate 0
      09-04-2012, 10:58 AM   #9
richb811
richb811's Avatar
479
Rep
4,591
Posts

Drives: 2020 G20 330i M Sport
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NJ

iTrader: (21)

From a drivers perspective, I like the idea of the M3 better. Its a more driver focused vehicle. MB still has a long way to go to get the C class AMG to be on par from a total package perspective with the M3.

Whether or not BMW delivers with the newest iteration is a different question entirely. Based on their previous cars I have little reason to doubt them.

I've chosen cars before simply on the basis of engine, and frankly I was disappointed. As much as I loved my 03 Corvette Z06, I could have had an E46 M3 for the same price and after driving both extensively I know which one I would pick going back in time.

Best of luck with your decision!
Appreciate 0
      09-04-2012, 11:18 AM   #10
kyleb350
Brigadier General
kyleb350's Avatar
United_States
427
Rep
4,709
Posts

Drives: '21 X3MC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Milwaukee

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hwelvaar View Post
A 5.5L engine costs like 4.000$ per year in taxes here in Belgium, and probably other European countries.
A 3.2 L would costs about 1.200$ per year in taxes.

Just for that, I'd have M3 over C63 AMG any day.

You Americans have the luck not having to worry about engine displacement. We do. And I guess BMW takes this into account as well when designing new cars.


And don't forget that 6-cylinder engines is what defines a great part of BMW's legacy, including multiple M3 generations.
I never got why Europe did this. If a car company can make an engine get 25 MPG and over 400HP, who cares how large it is?
Appreciate 0
      09-05-2012, 12:50 AM   #11
Gjm127
Lieutenant
Gjm127's Avatar
United_States
40
Rep
544
Posts

Drives: BMW 435i xDrive M-Sport
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal, QC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyleb350 View Post
I never got why Europe did this. If a car company can make an engine get 25 MPG and over 400HP, who cares how large it is?
I think it was more BMW's choice rather than legal restrictions forcing them to downgrade to I6.
I6 has always been BMW's bread and butter, even though I highly feel like this V8 should have been kept and could have been one hell of a dynasty.
Appreciate 0
      09-05-2012, 01:21 AM   #12
CALWATERBOY
Major
CALWATERBOY's Avatar
147
Rep
1,160
Posts

Drives: 2009 E93 N54
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hwelvaar View Post
A 5.5L engine costs like 4.000$ per year in taxes here in Belgium, and probably other European countries.
A 3.2 L would costs about 1.200$ per year in taxes.

You Americans have the luck not having to worry about engine displacement. We do. And I guess BMW takes this into account as well when designing new cars.
Advice: Vote the bums out!
Appreciate 0
      09-06-2012, 10:26 PM   #13
Tacoma
Captain
Canada
943
Rep
750
Posts

Drives: BMWs for 30 yrs
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto, ON

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by agentm View Post
MB NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by yaymitch View Post
Hey, Fan-boy!!

Why do you say this? Ever driven an AMG? I am okay with your opinion, but at least explain your reasoning. Or not...
It's the same as the OP saying "except IS-F" but you didn't catch that. To each his own.
Appreciate 0
      09-07-2012, 12:42 AM   #14
aus
Major General
United_States
905
Rep
9,030
Posts

Drives: Odysse
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seal Beach, CA

iTrader: (10)

The answer is a blown S65.

.
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
Appreciate 0
      10-01-2012, 01:13 PM   #15
valeram
Major
38
Rep
1,413
Posts

Drives: 992 TTS, 991.2 GT3 T, F80 M3 C
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dublin, OH

iTrader: (0)

Same here. I am thinking of getting the 2014 E92 M3 or the latest C63. The way I look at it, M's and AMG's should have a different engine from the same model lineup.
Appreciate 0
      10-04-2012, 08:36 AM   #16
nbennettksu
Brigadier General
1411
Rep
3,164
Posts

Drives: g80
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by valeram View Post
Same here. I am thinking of getting the 2014 E92 M3 or the latest C63. The way I look at it, M's and AMG's should have a different engine from the same model lineup.
Better hurry; 2013 is the last year of the E92, not 2014.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBasham View Post
Caddy ATS . . . finally, a decent rental car option.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kchu221 View Post
the wheels make me mad...
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhabs View Post
It's one thing for some buffoon to put an M badge on something that doesn't deserve it...it's another for a multi-billion dollar corporation to do the exact same thing and keep a straight face.
Appreciate 0
      10-06-2012, 11:03 PM   #17
seanwillnotreturn
New Member
2
Rep
20
Posts

Drives: m3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Shanghai

iTrader: (0)

Mercedes is not very good at making C AMG look good, isnt he?
Appreciate 0
      10-07-2012, 09:23 AM   #18
gblansten
Brigadier General
gblansten's Avatar
2421
Rep
4,510
Posts

Drives: 23 Tesla S Plaid
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Thick ascending limb

iTrader: (0)

I'll be test driving both and will decide based on pure fun of driving unless...

...if BMW puts Active Sound in the next M3 then I will move on to another make.
Appreciate 0
      10-07-2012, 09:25 AM   #19
///Mperative
Second Lieutenant
///Mperative's Avatar
United_States
16
Rep
281
Posts

Drives: like grandma
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New England

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 BMW 550xi  [0.00]
2011 E92 M3  [0.00]
There's no comparison between the M3 and C63 (in their current versions). You need to drive the C63 to get a sense of what I'm talking about. Basically, aside from the C63's cheap and crowded (way too many buttons) dashboard, it can't put down its power as effectively as the M3. I haven't driven one in a few years, so maybe they fixed this. When I drove it, the back end liked to step out under light acceleration. It's a little fun, but I couldn't live with something like that. I can't even imagine how horrible it would be in snow.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      10-19-2012, 06:08 AM   #20
amdmaxx
My gift Registry: M2
amdmaxx's Avatar
United_States
122
Rep
1,432
Posts

Drives: Future Mowner of Monster
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Ats-v might be a viable option too.
Appreciate 0
      10-23-2012, 09:46 AM   #21
motorsport_cat
Second Lieutenant
motorsport_cat's Avatar
Canada
52
Rep
218
Posts

Drives: 1995 740iL
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Montreal

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
1995 BMW 740iL  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul-Bracq-BMW View Post
Also The inline6 turbo will have the same HP as a V8, the same amount of torque (if not higher) and will weigh less, making the car lighter and better balanced. You will have the best of both worlds with the new M3, and with the classic inline 6 sound to match!
Wrong.
its not wrong!!!
__________________
///Meow
Appreciate 0
      10-23-2012, 04:44 PM   #22
flightz71
Second Lieutenant
22
Rep
210
Posts

Drives: 2014 F10 535i
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA

iTrader: (1)

I just hate how skinny the rear of a c63 is and will never plop $100k+ for a black edition.
Appreciate 0
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
2014 bmw m3, 2014 bmw m3 horsepower, 2014 bmw m3 specs, 2014 bmw m4 horsepower, 2014 bmw m4 specs, 2014 m3, 2014 m3 engine, 2014 m3 forum, 2014 m3 horsepower, 2014 m3 hp, 2014 m3 specs, 2014 m3 weight, 2014 m4 engine, 2014 m4 horsepower, 2014 m4 hp, 2014 m4 specs, 2014 m4 weight, 2015 bmw m3, 2015 bmw m3 specs, 2015 bmw m4, 2015 bmw m4 specs, 2015 m3, 2015 m3 engine, 2015 m3 specs, 2015 m4, 2015 m4 engine, 2015 m4 hp, 2015 m4 specs, 2015 m4 weight, bmw f80, bmw f80 forum, bmw f80 forums, bmw f80 m3, bmw f80 m3 s55, bmw f80 m3 sedan, bmw f82, bmw f82 forum, bmw f82 forums, bmw f82 m3 coupe, bmw f82 m4, bmw f82 m4 coupe, bmw f82 m4 s55, bmw f82 m4 video, bmw f83, bmw f83 m3, bmw f83 m4, bmw m forum, bmw m forums, bmw m3 forum, bmw m3 forums, bmw m3 s55, bmw m3 s55 engine, bmw m4, bmw m4 coupe, bmw m4 coupe forum, bmw m4 forum, bmw m4 forums, bmw m4 horsepower, bmw m4 hp, bmw m4 redline, bmw m4 rev limit, bmw m4 rev limiter, bmw m4 weight, f80 m3, f82 m4

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST