Next Level Auto Brokers
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Forum > BMW M3 (F80) and BMW M4 (F82) General Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-12-2013, 07:51 PM   #177
Wolfinwolfsclothing
Banned
37
Rep
1,312
Posts

Drives: E92 ///M3 Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: B-roads

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesons Viggen View Post
A bit of an exaggeration don't you think?

You know that 2.0L AMG engine making 355hp(177hp per liter) already has tunes and bolt ons for it. So the S55 is 140hp per liter.

It's going to be hell if all these tuned cars just blow up every 5K miles.
I too worry about how maxed this car is from the start. 18.1 psi is up there given the small turbos and small displacement.
The 335 was the same bore same stroke and same displacement which only put out 8 psi stock. So essentially the same motor given some changes is putting out more than twice what its little brother was, boost wise. I don't see people getting a lot more power with a tune on those small turbos without serious reliability issues. We saw the many many problems the 335s had (I has 2 335s that threw limps all the time with tunes). It just seems like there is a lot less on the table here. I for one know how Audi has cracked down on the tuning of their cars and see BMW doing much of the same. Honestly, if its a fast or faster than my bolt on e92 m3 dct, thats good enough for me. Id rather have it sound better than worry about a tune. Essentially this should be putting out 996 turbo numbers, which even though thats a 15 yr old car, is still fast by any standard. This car should be a low 12 car and perfectly fine with that.
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 08:01 PM   #178
Jamesons Viggen
Brigadier General
United_States
195
Rep
3,780
Posts

Drives: '98 M Roadster stg 2+ S/C
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rochester Hills MI

iTrader: (3)

I don't think anyone said the S55 will mirror the n54 in terms of room for tuning when you look at where the boost starts off compared to how low the n54 started off.

But I take issue with this idea that the S55 will allow for no further tuning and will somehow blow up every 5k.

Its hard for me to think of any production turbo engine that has not had room for gains from tuning, some more so than others of course.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfinwolfsclothing View Post
I too worry about how maxed this car is from the start. 18.1 psi is up there given the small turbos and small displacement.
The 335 was the same bore same stroke and same displacement which only put out 8 psi stock. So essentially the same motor given some changes is putting out more than twice what its little brother was, boost wise. I don't see people getting a lot more power with a tune on those small turbos without serious reliability issues. We saw the many many problems the 335s had (I has 2 335s that threw limps all the time with tunes). It just seems like there is a lot less on the table here. I for one know how Audi has cracked down on the tuning of their cars and see BMW doing much of the same. Honestly, if its a fast or faster than my bolt on e92 m3 dct, thats good enough for me. Id rather have it sound better than worry about a tune. Essentially this should be putting out 996 turbo numbers, which even though thats a 15 yr old car, is still fast by any standard. This car should be a low 12 car and perfectly fine with that.
__________________

'98 Dinan/RMS stage 2+(VAC cams, CES Cutring etc)
'15 Buick Regal "T"(wife)
'06 Saab 9-5 Combi 5mt (full suspension, LSD, clipped turbo etc)

Last edited by Jamesons Viggen; 12-12-2013 at 08:08 PM..
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 08:02 PM   #179
Suave
Major
Suave's Avatar
United_States
290
Rep
1,449
Posts

Drives: GT4 and M2 in progress
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sedan_Clan
Quote:
Originally Posted by bimmerjph View Post

Also, did we ever figure out why new BMW's make that fart noise? Because they have kind of gone a bit overboard with it.
It's the auto-blip!
My Porsche Boxster S I gave up for the M4 did the same thing and it's awesome in spirited driving!
__________________
201X ???? Coming soon
2015 F80 M3 AW/SO - Going Going Gone!
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 08:11 PM   #180
Theride
Private First Class
23
Rep
145
Posts

Drives: 2006
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NY

iTrader: (0)

those seats are horrible. Otherwise give me the M4
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 08:16 PM   #181
Wolfinwolfsclothing
Banned
37
Rep
1,312
Posts

Drives: E92 ///M3 Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: B-roads

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesons Viggen View Post
I don't think anyone said the S55 will mirror the n54 in terms of room for tuning when you look at where the boost starts off compared to how low the n54 started off.

But I take issue with this idea that the S55 will allow for no further tuning and will somehow blow up every 5k.

Its hard for me to think of any production turbo engine that has not had room for gains from tuning, some more so than others of course.
I agree that saying it'll break every 5k miles is a bit hyperbolic, however, speaking based loosely on what we know, doesn't seem like theres as much on the table as people think. If people think they are just going to get a tune and downpipes and maybe 550-600 hp they're going to be seriously disappointed.
If you want a car that will make big big power easily this isn't going to be the car.

The most powerful turbo car hp/liter wise is the GT2 RS. That car has some massive turbos and is a 3.6 liter (620 hp). The f8x has neither the displacement that car has nor the size turbos. So making 600 or even 550 hp from a 3 liter with turbos that small, and making it reliably doesn't seem to add up to me.

Lets also not forget, the DCT has tq limits, and what about the limits of the cf driveshaft. Its so much more than just hp, but the ancillary parts that are affected as well.
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 08:19 PM   #182
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
643
Rep
10,404
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfinwolfsclothing View Post
This car should be a low 12 car and perfectly fine with that.
Good comments. However, I think the car has a very good chance to put down some high 11s.
__________________
E92 M3 | Space Gray on Fox Red | M-DCT | CF Roof | RAC RG63 Wheels | Brembo 380mm BBK |
| Vorsteiner Ti Exhaust | Matte Black Grilles/Side Gills/Rear Emblem/Mirrors |
| Alekshop Back up Camera | GP Thunders | BMW Aluminum Pedals | Elite Angels |
| XPEL Full Front Wrap | Hardwired V1 | Interior Xenon Light Kit |
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 08:23 PM   #183
Holset
Captain
Sweden
327
Rep
720
Posts

Drives: F90 M5 Comp LCI
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sweden

iTrader: (0)

Love the finished cars nice looks and spec.

But im not a fan of the yellow and blue exterior colors on the released pics ,i think the cars are going to look better in a dark grey (Sparkling Graphite Metallic) or black color they shows the lines better.

Last edited by Holset; 12-12-2013 at 08:34 PM..
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 09:00 PM   #184
yemski
Lieutenant
yemski's Avatar
United_States
38
Rep
491
Posts

Drives: 2011 1M
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2011 1M Coupe  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3V8Cabrio View Post
I find it insulting that a car of this caliber has Japanese engine components.
I find your ignorance insulting, you clearly don't know much about car components and where quality components come from.
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 09:02 PM   #185
secono330ci
Private
United_States
4
Rep
76
Posts

Drives: 04 330ci
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Space Coast, Florida

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by yemski View Post
I find your ignorance insulting, you clearly don't know much about car components and where quality components come from.
+1
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 09:56 PM   #186
GregW / Oregon
Commander-In-Chief
2383
Rep
9,029
Posts

Drives: 2023 M2 Coupe, 2020 GLE 450
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lake Oswego, OR

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesons Viggen View Post
So you are on board with the exaggeration of blowing up every 5k miles if not left stock? Because that was what my reply was to.
No, I was merely pointing out the specific output achievable with an i4 can be more difficult with an I6.
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 09:59 PM   #187
GregW / Oregon
Commander-In-Chief
2383
Rep
9,029
Posts

Drives: 2023 M2 Coupe, 2020 GLE 450
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lake Oswego, OR

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by yemski View Post
I find your ignorance insulting, you clearly don't know much about car components and where quality components come from.
He probably has an iPhone with Chinese components, too.
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 10:00 PM   #188
Jamesons Viggen
Brigadier General
United_States
195
Rep
3,780
Posts

Drives: '98 M Roadster stg 2+ S/C
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rochester Hills MI

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW / Oregon View Post
No, I was merely pointing out the specific output achievable with an i4 can be more difficult with an I6.
I was giving an example to the every 5k blow up argument that a highly stressed engine making 26psi peak, 177hp per liter- already has tunes available. The S55 seems tame in comparison.
__________________

'98 Dinan/RMS stage 2+(VAC cams, CES Cutring etc)
'15 Buick Regal "T"(wife)
'06 Saab 9-5 Combi 5mt (full suspension, LSD, clipped turbo etc)
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 11:24 PM   #189
bmwluvr24
Driving Mika all over California.....
bmwluvr24's Avatar
United_States
57
Rep
619
Posts

Drives: 2008 E60 M5
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA

iTrader: (0)

In my opinion, releasing the cars in the same color would take away their identities. It was quite intelligent to make them contrast so much. They both have unique character and it is more obvious with these color choices.
__________________
2008 E60 M5 Sepang Bronze Metallic, gloss black grills and gills, LED side markers, 12mm spacers all around, stud conversion kit, custom exhaust with Magnaflow mufflers and x-pipe.
Appreciate 0
      12-12-2013, 11:54 PM   #190
MTROUBLE93
Private First Class
9
Rep
123
Posts

Drives: 09 interlagos blue M3
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NEWYORK

iTrader: (0)

My car sounds better... Just sayin
Appreciate 0
      12-13-2013, 12:20 AM   #191
Roki_014
Major
339
Rep
1,316
Posts

Drives: 2024 i5 M60
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JunkStory View Post
+1

this shiny mustard color is burning my eyes. Otherwise this car is absolutely amazing and going to beat every other competitor out there.
Which competitor are you talking about the 35k mustang gt or the 50 k corvette, both of them together cost less than what this car will cost
Appreciate 0
      12-13-2013, 12:35 AM   #192
bmwluvr24
Driving Mika all over California.....
bmwluvr24's Avatar
United_States
57
Rep
619
Posts

Drives: 2008 E60 M5
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roki_014 View Post
Which competitor are you talking about the 35k mustang gt or the 50 k corvette, both of them together cost less than what this car will cost
A fully loaded Z51 package Corvette runs $73k with no mark up. And maybe it's just me, but I think the Mustang GT does not stand a chance against the F80 or F82. Why are Mustangs even in the comparisons? That is like saying the Honda Civic SI is comparable to the Lotus Elise, just because some figures are the same. There is more to the equation than number matching. It was only something I found out recently after driving the shit out of my friends E92. Other cars in the same HP range did not give me the excited feeling that the M3 delivered. If this next car is above that level, then the Mustang talk will die down quickly.
__________________
2008 E60 M5 Sepang Bronze Metallic, gloss black grills and gills, LED side markers, 12mm spacers all around, stud conversion kit, custom exhaust with Magnaflow mufflers and x-pipe.
Appreciate 0
      12-13-2013, 12:44 AM   #193
pruettfan
Brigadier General
1627
Rep
3,402
Posts

Drives: 2017 M2, LBB, DCT, Exec
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ

iTrader: (0)

Both the M3 and M4 look fantastic. I love the sculpting they have done on the body to shape it in the most efficient and effective way. It reminds me of some of the aero work done on a Formula One cars. The interior is really cool, love the seats and I really appreciate the fact that BWM made the M3 and M4 interiors unique to those cars rather than just using the 3 or 4 series components with a M logo on them. The level of performance and efficiency of these cars is really impressive. It is likely these cars will get over 30mpg on the freeway which is amazing given the performance. Love them both. I am three years away from being able to order mine. It is going to be a long 3 years
Appreciate 0
      12-13-2013, 02:32 AM   #194
leletyM3
HPF Stg2 640rwhp
11
Rep
294
Posts

Drives: HPF M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (1)

I like it more and more!! Time to save now!!
Appreciate 0
      12-13-2013, 03:56 AM   #195
solstice
Major General
5520
Rep
7,079
Posts

Drives: 2015 M3 6MT
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Seattle

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfinwolfsclothing View Post
I agree that saying it'll break every 5k miles is a bit hyperbolic, however, speaking based loosely on what we know, doesn't seem like theres as much on the table as people think. If people think they are just going to get a tune and downpipes and maybe 550-600 hp they're going to be seriously disappointed.
If you want a car that will make big big power easily this isn't going to be the car.

The most powerful turbo car hp/liter wise is the GT2 RS. That car has some massive turbos and is a 3.6 liter (620 hp). The f8x has neither the displacement that car has nor the size turbos. So making 600 or even 550 hp from a 3 liter with turbos that small, and making it reliably doesn't seem to add up to me.

Lets also not forget, the DCT has tq limits, and what about the limits of the cf driveshaft. Its so much more than just hp, but the ancillary parts that are affected as well.
I suspect that 18 psi is close to max what you can run with 10.2:1 compression ratio on 93 octane. The combustion chamber pressure is built by compression and bost and when you reach self detonation it's game over. Sure you can keep retarding ignition but it's not efficient. The GT2 RS runs 23 psi at peak boost I think but it's compression ratio is only 9:1.

Here's some play with numbers to give an idea vs the GT2 RS

18psi x 10.2 = 183.6
23psi x 9 = 207

207 / 10.2 = 20.2

So maybe there is room for ~ 2 psi tune if the turbos can generate it.
( I realize this is over simplified and not mathematically or scientifically precise but it gives us some idea )

Last edited by solstice; 12-13-2013 at 04:02 AM..
Appreciate 0
      12-13-2013, 07:36 AM   #196
Jay-K
Brigadier General
Jay-K's Avatar
Indonesia
387
Rep
3,450
Posts

Drives: Slow
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: LA

iTrader: (0)

those seats are to die for!
__________________
"Well, there's a straight-six engine at the front, a manual gearbox in the middle and drive goes to the back. That's Page 1, Chapter 1 from the petrosexual handbook" - JC
Appreciate 0
      12-13-2013, 07:37 AM   #197
Wolfinwolfsclothing
Banned
37
Rep
1,312
Posts

Drives: E92 ///M3 Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: B-roads

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by solstice View Post
I suspect that 18 psi is close to max what you can run with 10.2:1 compression ratio on 93 octane. The combustion chamber pressure is built by compression and bost and when you reach self detonation it's game over. Sure you can keep retarding ignition but it's not efficient. The GT2 RS runs 23 psi at peak boost I think but it's compression ratio is only 9:1.

Here's some play with numbers to give an idea vs the GT2 RS

18psi x 10.2 = 183.6
23psi x 9 = 207

207 / 10.2 = 20.2

So maybe there is room for ~ 2 psi tune if the turbos can generate it.
( I realize this is over simplified and not mathematically or scientifically precise but it gives us some idea )
I agree and good post. Theres still a lot to figure out but generally speaking I just don't think the f8x is going to have the ability to pull 75-100 hp from a tune like some people think. 2 psi (which seems true) isn't going to give you nearly that much power either if it can be done.

The GT2 RS still has a lot left on the table since the turbos are bigger and can push well more than they have stock especially seeing its a Mezger motor and compression isn't that high.
Appreciate 0
      12-13-2013, 10:21 AM   #198
amdmaxx
My gift Registry: M2
amdmaxx's Avatar
United_States
122
Rep
1,432
Posts

Drives: Future Mowner of Monster
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Why is CD (coefficient of drag) .03 worse than E90/92?
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2014 bmw m3, 2014 bmw m3 horsepower, 2014 bmw m3 specs, 2014 bmw m4 horsepower, 2014 bmw m4 specs, 2014 m3, 2014 m3 engine, 2014 m3 forum, 2014 m3 horsepower, 2014 m3 hp, 2014 m3 specs, 2014 m3 weight, 2014 m4 engine, 2014 m4 horsepower, 2014 m4 hp, 2014 m4 specs, 2014 m4 weight, 2015 bmw m3, 2015 bmw m3 specs, 2015 bmw m4, 2015 bmw m4 specs, 2015 m3, 2015 m3 engine, 2015 m3 specs, 2015 m4, 2015 m4 engine, 2015 m4 hp, 2015 m4 specs, 2015 m4 weight, bmw f80, bmw f80 forum, bmw f80 forums, bmw f80 m3, bmw f80 m3 s55, bmw f80 m3 sedan, bmw f82, bmw f82 forum, bmw f82 forums, bmw f82 m3 coupe, bmw f82 m4, bmw f82 m4 coupe, bmw f82 m4 s55, bmw f82 m4 video, bmw f83, bmw f83 m3, bmw f83 m4, bmw m forum, bmw m forums, bmw m3 forum, bmw m3 forums, bmw m3 s55, bmw m3 s55 engine, bmw m4, bmw m4 coupe, bmw m4 coupe forum, bmw m4 forum, bmw m4 forums, bmw m4 horsepower, bmw m4 hp, bmw m4 redline, bmw m4 rev limit, bmw m4 rev limiter, bmw m4 weight, f80 m3, f82 m4

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST