|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-27-2014, 10:28 PM | #111 |
Banned
54
Rep 502
Posts |
Not denying any of that man. But as you yourself said, by capitalizing and selling the car to masses, they are losing those a "few" enthusiasts that you mention (which are the hardcore M3 guys on this forum). Not that you, BMW, me, or anyone cares.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 10:31 PM | #113 |
Second Lieutenant
29
Rep 290
Posts |
Well I do care to an extent, that means every other average joe will be driving one too so the exclusivity goes out the window. Look at GTR, I may only see two a week. I see m3s, c63amgs all over all the sudden (cheaper now).
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 11:11 PM | #114 |
Major General
431
Rep 6,967
Posts |
We will see. Is it as much of an animal as engine in P1 or 918 or even the new engine in C class AMG
__________________
- There's nothing in my pocket other than knives and lint
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 11:21 PM | #115 | |
Colonel
507
Rep 2,397
Posts |
Actually, I think I'd prefer the charity car...means I got more value than the company did!
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 11:26 PM | #116 |
Colonel
507
Rep 2,397
Posts |
Agree - amazing how a company like Porsche can deliver more of what enthusiasts want but still make SUVs and Sedans for the 'non enthusiast' consumers. And by the way, those 'non enthusiast vehicles' actually are the best handling/driving vehicles in their categories. All the while, Porsche has been able to have the highest profit margins of any automobile company (yes, even before they were bought out by VW). Bigger is not necessarily better.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 11:56 PM | #117 | |
Major General
905
Rep 9,030
Posts |
Quote:
BMW could make the best handling sedans and SAV and keep it's core enthusiast happy it it wanted to, but they'd rather just sell to the masses. .
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 12:07 AM | #118 | |
Law Enforcer
26869
Rep 22,694
Posts
Drives: '22 Chalk Gray Porsche C2S
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ..in your rearview!!!
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 01:29 AM | #120 | |
Second Lieutenant
43
Rep 221
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 01:37 AM | #121 |
Brigadier General
423
Rep 3,479
Posts
Drives: 19 M2C 6MT
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
hmmm
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 01:40 AM | #122 | ||
Lieutenant General
640
Rep 10,404
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Bingo all three are important factors. This is why generally speaking the higher performance and more track oriented a car is, the more rear weight bias it will have compared to 50-50. F1 is not the best example since they develop absurd aero downforce, but they too must handle at low speed without crazy downforce. They too have a significant rear weight bias. Sure, you can always find cars that handle well with 50-50 or even a slight front bias but they are fighting the physics...
__________________
E92 M3 | Space Gray on Fox Red | M-DCT | CF Roof | RAC RG63 Wheels | Brembo 380mm BBK | | Vorsteiner Ti Exhaust | Matte Black Grilles/Side Gills/Rear Emblem/Mirrors | | Alekshop Back up Camera | GP Thunders | BMW Aluminum Pedals | Elite Angels | | XPEL Full Front Wrap | Hardwired V1 | Interior Xenon Light Kit | Last edited by swamp2; 01-28-2014 at 01:48 AM.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 02:09 AM | #123 |
Private First Class
5
Rep 139
Posts |
There will be independent reviews (not by BMW DTM drivers who are paid by BMW), tests, comparos with the competition and let's see the results, the car is not even out for sale yet and we are already making it a winner, I think it is too early, lets wait.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 02:30 AM | #124 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
827
Rep 1,585
Posts |
Quote:
Based on my experience and what I've read on vehicle design, chassis setup, etc. it seems to me that 50:50 is a good target for a car that is fairly neutral; fun but also safe and easy to control. 40:60 is closer to what you want for the fastest lap times. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 05:24 AM | #125 | ||
Banned
3795
Rep 6,673
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Great points. I won't lie, the anticipation and marketing hype in the air is beginning to feel similar to the excitement leading up to the release of the f30 cars. We all know how that went. And to me, the f80 will be such a radically different car than the e90/92 that it's impossible (statistically) that all these people will be pleased. Artificial sound, I-6 / V-8, EPS, forced induction, larger dimensions, ... |
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 06:43 AM | #126 |
Major
118
Rep 1,140
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 06:53 AM | #127 | |
Major
118
Rep 1,140
Posts |
Quote:
Edit: Oops, you meant tunes as in "original-BMW-tuned-by-M-division." |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 08:55 AM | #129 | |
Second Lieutenant
9
Rep 222
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by cs4444; 01-28-2014 at 09:10 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 08:57 AM | #130 | |
Major General
1730
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
So credit to BMW for at least trying to get as close to 50/50 as possible, instead of just doing an Audi and creating nose heavy cars. Without adding ballast, it's probably not realistic to expect a 40/60 weight distribution on a M car. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 09:16 AM | #132 |
Lieutenant
170
Rep 444
Posts |
Hear hear. Seriously, this absurd quote results in a 6 page thread? Come on guys, I expect more.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|