|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-26-2012, 01:53 PM | #23 |
Major General
1730
Rep 5,110
Posts |
The blue handle fuel nozzle IS for E85 (at Statoil gas stations anyway):
Statoil warns against using E85 on a regular car due to the issues associated with etanol on gaskets, fuel lines etc. SAAB used specific fuel system components on their E85 models. In the US there has been 10% etanol added for a number of years, meaning that US cars might be more compatible with E85? On the other hand I doubt that BMW and other manufacturers choose different material for fuel components for the Euro vs US versions. GM stopped using different materials in 2005 after no ill effects had been detected from E85. Maybe the E85 "issues" is just a urban myth? Something for Mythbusters to investigate |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:02 PM | #24 | |
The power of V!
103
Rep 1,971
Posts
Drives: 2007 335i coupe steptronic
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1998 Lexus Gs400 [0.00]
2010 ebony & ivory [0.00] 2006 BMW X3 [0.00] 2009 pics [0.00] 2009 e92 335 xdrive [0.00] |
Quote:
__________________
2007 335 coupe Alpine white, steptronic, sportpack, etc. (gone)
2006 X3 3.0 steptronic Titanium Silver, 2009 E92 335xdrive, next.... Caddy CTS_V! 13 Lincoln MKZ? hmmm. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:05 PM | #25 |
Private
0
Rep 74
Posts |
So why didn't the "astute witness" just ask the test driver if he was intentionally filling with E85? Even if the test driver didn't want to answer the question, it would likely be obvious from his reaction whether it was intentional or not.
__________________
-Ed
2013 F30 328i M Sport 2008 Lotus Exige S240 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:14 PM | #26 | ||
Moderator
7538
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
For any blend above E15 (and especially something as high as E85) I cannot imagine that it would be safe for use as a general practice in any arbitrary vehicle (even if the ECU was programmed to make proper use of it or at least allow for it). As someone mentions above, some other countries employ higher ethanol blends as standard practice. This fact may mean that some manufacturers decide to build all cars on a worldwide basis (or at least some models, particularly global ones) to run on such higher ethanol concentrated blends without incident. But I certainly would not make that assumption. There is more than likely some room for error (say, E20, as an example), but I think E85 could make non-metal engine parts (gaskets and seals) break down. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:15 PM | #27 | |
Colonel
505
Rep 2,397
Posts |
Yeah, knowing what exactly went on at the scene probably has more explanatory power vs the fact that E85 was pumped in. It is weird that a presumably German BMW driver isn't able to properly identify which side the fuel door is, which then begs the question, was it a German driver.
As far as E85 efficiency, I thought E85 can be well harnessed in turbocharged engines with reasonably high compression ratios, if the engine is specifically built/tuned for E85. Here's something that was tested on a vehicle from now defunct Saab, where more power was acheived with no penalty in efficiency: http://www.popsci.com/cars/article/2...oes-it-quicker Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:18 PM | #28 |
Registered
0
Rep 2
Posts |
I ran my BMW 1991 E36 320i on E85 for 3years and 50000 kilometers.
I just put in a new Walbro255 fuelpump, used larger injectors and aftermarket engine management system. Ran just fine! No issues at all with gaskets etc. Passed emissiontests yearly! E85 has had a bad reputation but that is probably since all the ethanolcars so far have been made in order to be able to run regular fuel as well.... 13:1 - 15:1 in compression for a N/A engine on E85 should show much better mileage and economy. Mythbusters would probably find that regular fuel is more corrosive that ethanol on most hoses.. It's only untreated aluminium that will show signs of wear/corrosion. So plastic or stainless steel is better material for the fuelrail! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:21 PM | #29 | |
Moderator
7538
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
Also, it is not clear to me from the account that the test driver didn't correct himself on his own before fueling up (or at least putting too much fuel in). Maybe the photographer started to walk over so as to keep the guy from "bricking his car" and before he could, the mistake was corrected. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:22 PM | #31 |
Major General
1730
Rep 5,110
Posts |
According to the datasheet from Statoil the European 98 octane gas does NOT have any etanol at all.
Table 3 lists the contents of the fuel: http://www3.statoil.com/MNE/SVG02326...2?OpenDocument E85 (still Table 3): http://www3.statoil.com/MNE/SVG02326...A?OpenDocument |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:24 PM | #32 | |
Major General
1730
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Quote:
We used to have a couple of cars that were converted to run on CNG. Worked fine for a long time... Until the catalysts disintegrated and the cylinder heads corroded (the combustion chamber in the head looked like it was smouldering away... Very pourous). Ending in a cloud of smoke and a major engine rebuild... Last edited by Boss330; 11-26-2012 at 02:29 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:32 PM | #33 | |
Moderator
7538
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Yes, that stands to reason I suppose. Ethanol, I believe, in general has a higher octane rating than standard petroleum based fuel, so the more of it you use, by that reasoning, the higher octane the blend will achieve. If an engine is built to properly take advantage of that (higher compression, rather than just spark advancement for example), it would naturally be more efficient than one that was not.
I see macadam has basically covered this point in his post as well. His points about corrosiveness are good too. I admit my knowledge is limited here. What I would say, then, is that, building an engine to run on higher concentrations of ethanol may require the use of certain materials which aren't used in general for engines that just run on E15 or lower. It would probably not be a good idea to go testing out E85 blindly or mixing in E85 with your E5-15 just to see what happens. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:33 PM | #34 |
11127
Rep 27,878
Posts |
interesting. makes you wondering seeing how he pulled into the pump on the wrong side. lol
__________________
BEFORE YOU BUY YOUR NEXT BMW, EMAIL OUR GUY KOTE FIRST! Kote M Sales:Kotem@bmwofcamarillo.com Cell:805-368-9101 vipfinance@bmwofcamarillo.com for warranties! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:37 PM | #35 | |
Colonel
123
Rep 2,024
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:43 PM | #36 | |
Moderator
7538
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
In seriousness, he may have a car with a driver's-side fuel neck for his daily. I'm not sure if that would rule out all BMW's, but perhaps not Mini? I don't know. Or maybe these guys don't make enough to scrape together the funds for a BMW. I think they cost about twice what they do over here, no? For the money, I might choose a Focus ST or something else with more power than a 316d. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 03:34 PM | #37 |
i can haz horsepowr ??
4157
Rep 2,038
Posts |
I severely doubt BMW will ever make a map for E85 fuel.
And if they did.. could you imagine how much they'd charge for that?
__________________
@dakar.g80
Gone but not forgotten: G80 M3, 991.1 GT3, F80 M3 ZCP, E46 M3 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 03:45 PM | #38 |
Brigadier General
1954
Rep 3,255
Posts
Drives: 2018 BMW 440i GC
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern MA
|
I must be missing something, why is it considered an advancement if the bmw can run on e85 cant my e90 run on it without issue? That stuff is all they have at some usa stations
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 03:55 PM | #40 |
Lieutenant
16
Rep 593
Posts |
E85 = 8 mpg city/10 mpg highway
__________________
2020 M8 GC Donington Grey Metallic
2013 M5 Moonstone Metallic (sold) 2011 550i Dark Graphite Metallic (sold) 2007 750Li Black Sapphire Metallic (sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 04:15 PM | #41 |
Captain
314
Rep 821
Posts
Drives: BMW 335i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los Angeles
|
lol It seems he is totally lost!
__________________
The Best Is Yet To Come!
E36 - E39 - E53 - E60 - E87 - E90 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 05:28 PM | #43 |
Brigadier General
506
Rep 3,445
Posts |
Most US petrol is now E10. E15 is expected to be rolled out soon. E85 is difficult to find in central Houston.
__________________
See my photography at http://ronscubadiver.wordpress.com
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 05:52 PM | #44 |
Major General
460
Rep 6,478
Posts |
people run e20-30 with frequency in their n54/5s, for the most part there havent been any real issues other than maxing trims...if youre tuned for it, you can run more aggressive mixes than those stated above. You dont want to throw a full tank of e85 in, but a modest mixture with pump can add power while smoothing out timing. Its really not that weird or exotic for the test driver to see how the car likes it.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|