05-21-2012, 02:29 PM | #45 |
Banned
869
Rep 6,248
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:29 PM | #46 |
Banned
74
Rep 449
Posts
Drives: 2013 BMW M3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: I'm not telling some creeper where I live!
|
I'm guessing only a little bit. CF still costs a lot and if BMW used extensive amounts of it, it would push the price up significantly. The M3 is BMW's bread and butter and sells more then any other M car.(X5/X6 M excluded) They have to keep it at a specific price point.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:31 PM | #47 | |
Banned
74
Rep 449
Posts
Drives: 2013 BMW M3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: I'm not telling some creeper where I live!
|
a
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:42 PM | #49 |
Major General
739
Rep 6,861
Posts
Drives: 2014 BMW 435i X-drive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reston, VA
|
before everyone gets excited
something tells me this will be an adaptation of the N54/55 sort of like the engine in the 1m (heaven forbid)
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:42 PM | #50 | ||
Banned
82
Rep 2,396
Posts
Drives: '08 E90 335i
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern NJ
|
Quote:
Quote:
The M-DCT will be ~8 years old (according to the press release, we won't see the F80/F82 until 2016) so you need to think a little harder if you don't think there will be a better option out there. E46 M3 had the SMG II --> E60 M5/M6 gets SMG III --> E9x M3 gets M-DCT --> F10 M5/M6 gets M-DCT It's only natural the next M3 will get a new gearbox, that rips out faster shifts, is lighter & yields more HP from the flywheel to the wheels. Rated ///M, you probably would've been the same person who said that the M-DCT is stupid because it has 7 gears. Now you're ripping out stats on it: Whatever BMW does, the next M3 will deliver & demolish the E92. Last edited by benzy89; 06-22-2012 at 10:16 AM.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:45 PM | #52 |
Major General
4457
Rep 9,160
Posts |
So a longer (and likely heavier) engine that extends further past the front suspension will bring back balance and handling?
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:47 PM | #53 | |
Banned
869
Rep 6,248
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:51 PM | #54 | |
Banned
82
Rep 2,396
Posts
Drives: '08 E90 335i
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern NJ
|
Quote:
Who knows? It's not like there's a ZF transmission blog where people are hyped up to see what new trans they release & the specs on it. The current trans is phenomenal, its not the GTR gear box but I'd say its easily on par w/ the Porsche/Audi PDK system. I just don't see BMW recycling a gearbox (even if it's revamped & "upgraded" after the time it spends in the M5/M6) for a 3rd encore. Last edited by benzy89; 06-22-2012 at 10:17 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:52 PM | #55 |
instagram: black.listed_
20
Rep 238
Posts |
I was really hoping that they'd make it v8 =( but its okay! I'm excited to see what this brings to the table!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:52 PM | #56 | |
Major
258
Rep 1,003
Posts
Drives: 16 340i, 15 X3d, 91 318i
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Philly suburbs
|
Quote:
people need to keep in mind that balance doesn't necessarily go hand-in-hand with reduced weight. when you're squeezing the engine as rearward as possible, splitting the cylinders in half makes the engine shorter and easier to fit. a V-6 would allow for better balance in an overall smaller car or with a larger passenger area. 6 cylinders in a line are longer than 4 in a line. We know the engine will be longer. I will agree that we don't know it'll be heavier and I'd say it's highly unlikely that it will be heavier. I welcome an I-6 because it's BMWs classic bread-and-butter design and I'm sure the car will have 50/50 balance because BMW M is just brilliant like that. I really hope the US doesn't get some version that leaves us wanting the euro version, though. Last edited by S4NoMore; 05-21-2012 at 03:09 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 02:58 PM | #57 |
Banned
82
Rep 2,396
Posts
Drives: '08 E90 335i
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern NJ
|
V8s are unrealistic w/ emissions and fuel economy laws going into effect. Forced induction is the future for all "normal cars" (this excludes cars like the Aventador & Ferrari F70/next gen-Enzo).
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 03:03 PM | #58 | |
Banned
46
Rep 582
Posts |
Quote:
New fueling system New cooling system New turbos Exhaust manifolds for the n54 And it is a very strong motor if you havnt seen the 750 hp 335 now being built, this motor is great!!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 03:06 PM | #59 |
instagram: black.listed_
20
Rep 238
Posts |
Yeah~ I figured..Emission laws always has to take away the fun! I just wanted the M3 to have an V8TT configuration to battle it out with Mercedes/Audi haha But if they up the displacement on the I6 to what the GTR has(3.8L, or even 3.6L), and slap on some midrange turbos - or 3 in this case, This, I'd love to get into!
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 03:07 PM | #60 | |
instagram: black.listed_
20
Rep 238
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 03:17 PM | #61 | |
Banned
82
Rep 2,396
Posts
Drives: '08 E90 335i
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern NJ
|
Quote:
The high horsepower 335s are the single turbo applications (I haven't seen any RB/upgraded twin turbos going over mid-500 unless they're running meth), so I think BMW will stick with 2 (or 3) to prevent turbo-lag & try get the motor as close to the naturally-aspirated feeling as possible. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 03:19 PM | #63 |
Colonel
723
Rep 2,003
Posts |
I wonder if asking for a 3.3 or 3.5L I6 with 2 turbos is asking for too much now, our expectations are so low already.
If they came out with 3.0l I6 TT (basically a new N54) would we be shocked? The M5 is only 4.4l V8 TT that is shared (soon) with the 550i. If you buy a benz AMG you at least still get a 5.5l V8 TT which is different from the 4.7l in the 500/550 class models. Given that the target hp is only 450hp, 3.0l is not unimaginable, especially given how cheap BMW has proven recently, why bother creating a 3.3 or 3.5l engine? Unless there could be a use for it down the line, which is not unimaginable given the large gap that exists between the 3.0l I6 T and the 4.4l V8 TT. This could make the 4.4l V8 NA M3 GTS seem like such a gem in retrospect. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 03:26 PM | #65 | |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 38
Posts |
Quote:
A V6 can be understood as two Inline 3 cylinder blocks, side by side, also both aligned with the car lengthwise, connected to each other at a "V" angle. In practical terms, the V6 is a much shorter engine (almost half the length) that is much easier to fit into cars that might also be available with I4 or V8 engines. Since it is shorter you can also make the argument that it can contribute to a more rearward (favorable) weight distribution because its not so long like the I6 where much of the engine is in front of the front axle. However, the I6 is a naturally balanced engine which means that without adding any additional mechanical complexity it has the potential to run smoother, has the potential to be built so that it can be tuned to create higher power because there is less stress on the components, and has the potential to be built to sound better. The V6 is a particularly unbalanced engine where typical designs add a lot of mechanical complexity and weight in order to cancel out some of the vibrations and roughness, and even after that some of the vibrations are just tolerated as there is no easy way to cancel them out. As a reference, the V8 isn't naturally balanced either but it isn't as bad as the V6 and all the imbalances can be relatively easily canceled out with modifications to the basic mechanical design, so a typical V8 is very smooth like an I6. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2012, 03:31 PM | #66 |
Major
139
Rep 1,127
Posts
Drives: 2013 E92 M3, 2016 X5 50i
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pueblo West, CO
|
+1 I'm stationed in Germany and in the talk with the dealership to trade my 335i E92 for an E92M before they become 1of a kind!!!!
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|