GetBMWParts
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Technical Topics > Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust / Bolt-ons / Tuning

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-25-2013, 05:54 PM   #45
US///M3
Banned
100
Rep
1,265
Posts

Drives: 1973 Jensen Interceptor
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shanghai, People's Republic of China

iTrader: (0)

Wouldn't the small tubines/scrolls choke the tuned N55 above 7,000rpm?
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:08 PM   #46
Ezio
Brigadier General
Ezio's Avatar
United_States
388
Rep
3,932
Posts

Drives: 2023 Alfa Romeo, 2023 m240i
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: MI

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
No, it's only 600rpm apart... Or 7,8%

Hardly worlds apart...

The E30 M3 S14 engine had a rev limit of 7300rpm

The E36 M3 S50 engine had a rev limit of 7200rpm

The E46 M3 S54 engine had a rev limit of 8000rpm

The E9x M3 S65 engine has a rev limit of 8300rpm

Never heard much complaint about low rev limit on the prevoius straight engine M3's before...
You really don't see the flaw on your statement do you ?

let me help you out, its the year 2013. at the time of those engines, they "more" high revving. This new 2014 M3 will have a lower rev limiter than a 2002 BMW M3.

also 600RPM is a lot, nice try though.
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:08 PM   #47
M3_WC
Brigadier General
1046
Rep
3,622
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aajami View Post
Hi Boss330,

I appreciate the thoughtful feedback! It's certainly interesting to see the science behind it.

Per my original disclaimer, though, I was referring simply to the emotion of driving a high-revving engine vs. driving one with a lower redline. Or put another way, when I had my S2000, there was a world of difference between how the car felt and sounded (and how both made me feel) when I would hold the RPMs at 7,000 vs. when I'd hold them 8,000 and at 8,900. The same goes for the M3: 7K RPM feels a certain way -- and 8,000 feels like something else altogether.

Source: My unscientific brain.
This
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:12 PM   #48
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1730
Rep
5,110
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aajami View Post
Hi Boss330,

I appreciate the thoughtful feedback! It's certainly interesting to see the science behind it.

Per my original disclaimer, though, I was referring simply to the emotion of driving a high-revving engine vs. driving one with a lower redline. Or put another way, when I had my S2000, there was a world of difference between how the car felt and sounded (and how both made me feel) when I would hold the RPMs at 7,000 vs. when I'd hold them 8,000 and at 8,900. The same goes for the M3: 7K RPM feels a certain way -- and 8,000 feels like something else altogether.

Source: My unscientific brain.
Which is why I was surprised by the article I found, because my brain functions like yours... Not sure how big a difference 7700rpm vs 8300rpm will be though. And it's a 6cyl vs 8cyl, so totally different frequencies as well (8cyl has 1 more combustion per revolution 8/2 vs 6/2)
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:16 PM   #49
khanyam4
Ring Leader of G8X Trolls
khanyam4's Avatar
827
Rep
1,781
Posts

Drives: 16 F10 535i 25 xDrive G82
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 33.7743° N, 117.9380° W

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FogCityM3 View Post
Wow..incredible! only on M3 board could you get such innovative thinking and quality content!
agreed for the most part.
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:16 PM   #50
kgaler
Second Lieutenant
kgaler's Avatar
United_States
16
Rep
220
Posts

Drives: 135i DCT
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CT

iTrader: (1)

Newbi question: At the risk of being slightly off topic.... why does it matter if it redlines at 8K vs something like 7200?
__________________
2012 Alpine White 135i | DCT | Dinan Stage 3 | ER Charge Pipe | P3 Cars Boost Gauge | Performance Suspension | Terracotta Leather | M Sport Pkg | Premium Pkg | Heated Seats | Comfort Access |
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:16 PM   #51
strati1
Lieutenant
United_States
30
Rep
457
Posts

Drives: a slow car fast
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DFW/SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2
Quote:
Originally Posted by neo871 View Post
This is impressive! What do you actually do for a living?
I'm a recovering physicist and recovering engineer. Now I sell engineering software.
Wow, that sounds credible to me. Thank you sir.
__________________
//Mods: Golf Tee, red out tails, smoked fogs, B&G S2 Springs, Adjustable Koni Yellows, Vorshlag Camberplates, PSS 225 square, Macht Schnell 90mm studs, H&R spacers 15mm front 20mm rear (no rubbing), RPI scoops, K&N
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:23 PM   #52
Doctor///M
Brigadier General
Doctor///M's Avatar
United_States
1817
Rep
4,219
Posts

Drives: 2023 AUDI RS6
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (14)

Garage List
2023 Audi RS6 Avant  [0.00]
BMW M2 Competition   [10.00]
2009 BMW 335i  [0.00]
2015 M3  [9.52]
"...and the new M3 will have one of the best engines we have ever done." - Friedrich Nitschke

that's all I need to know :-D

Thanks for sharing this analysis. Science rules!
__________________
2020 F87 M2 Competition /l\ LBB /i\ Executive Package
2013 E70 X5M /l\ Space Grey /i\ Full Silverstone Leather /l\ LED Headlights /i\ Comfort Access /l\ HUD /i\ Ventilated Seats /l\ 22" BBS SV
BMW CCA Member
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:26 PM   #53
Brosef
Brigadier General
Brosef's Avatar
914
Rep
3,464
Posts

Drives: e92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
No, it's only 600rpm apart... Or 7,8%

Hardly worlds apart...

The E30 M3 S14 engine had a rev limit of 7300rpm

The E36 M3 S50 engine had a rev limit of 7200rpm

The E46 M3 S54 engine had a rev limit of 8000rpm

The E9x M3 S65 engine has a rev limit of 8300rpm

Never heard much complaint about low rev limit on the prevoius straight engine M3's before...
tough to settle for a hamburger after you've had steak.
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:30 PM   #54
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1730
Rep
5,110
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ezio View Post
You really don't see the flaw on your statement do you ?

let me help you out, its the year 2013. at the time of those engines, they "more" high revving. This new 2014 M3 will have a lower rev limiter than a 2002 BMW M3.

also 600RPM is a lot, nice try though.
600rpm is 30Hz, not a lot in my book But I appreciate that to many, it's emotionally a big deal not to have a redline over 8000rpm...

And, yes the redline is going "the wrong way" compared with the S65. My comparison was just to show that a 7700rpm redline isn't that different from previous gen M3 engines. And even though it might be redlined some 300rpm under the E46 M3, the S55 will have way more power... I know which I prefer given the choice of 300rpm more or 100+ hp more...

I wouldn't mind if BMW had stayed NA either, but I suspect (or at least hope ) the new M3/M4 will give the competition something to think about.
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 06:35 PM   #55
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1730
Rep
5,110
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brosef View Post
tough to settle for a hamburger after you've had steak.
Agreed, that's why I'd rather have superior performance than 600rpm's extra... If you can't have both 8300rpm and better performance in the same package I mean...

I suspect the E9x M3 will be like a burger performancewise compared with the F80
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 07:03 PM   #56
dcleminson
DMan
dcleminson's Avatar
Australia
0
Rep
6
Posts

Drives: Awaiting M4 With Anticipation
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by solstice View Post
Nice!

Here's a pretty clean audio of the only production I6 turbo M car, it's in cabin but it would be interresting to see what top rpm the SW spits out.

4:24 and 4:28 for example seems like possible redline shifts.
( if you watch the whole thing you will also see two M3s showing who the daddy is )

Awesome video.. The only cars asserting themselves over the M1 were the M3's...
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 07:13 PM   #57
FogCityM3
Colonel
FogCityM3's Avatar
504
Rep
2,397
Posts

Drives: M3 (E90) & Porsche GT3 RS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

LOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanyam3 View Post
agreed for the most part.
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 07:18 PM   #58
ProbyOne
Private
ProbyOne's Avatar
United_States
13
Rep
72
Posts

Drives: Acura TL / E93 M3 / 996
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: LA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Thanks. Although it is quick to do I don't want to analyze video after video. Anyone can do this with a plethora of free audio tools on any OS. A quick analysis of this one though around 4:24 indicated a much lower peak rpm than the 7000 rpm redline. The method is absolutely not 100% robust for all recordings but the baseline cases of the dyno runs completely convinced me that it can work. I suspect one reason here is simply the fact of internal vs. external audio. It's no doubt the design of passenger vehicles is to drown out a significant portion of engine and exhaust noise.
I also tested a few different dyno runs for various cars before convincing myself that it would work. With the right equipment it would be a pretty good way for racing teams to keep an eye (ear?) on the competition

I didn't have any good audio software on the computer and resorted to matching frequency by using this tone synthesizer http://www.philtulga.com/tone.html. Obviously Audacity is much more accurate with clear audio... I expected to be within ~5-10 Hz based on matching a few other cars really well.

I have a new appreciation for hitting the rev limiter on the dyno. We need someone to get out there with a good mic and radar gun
__________________
you are a winner
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 07:34 PM   #59
StealYourFace
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
264
Rep
1,794
Posts

Drives: F30 328i M 6mt, E36 M3
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Shakedown Street, Buffalo NY

iTrader: (1)

I love all the sour pusses on this board hahaha. Some forum guy made an assumption based on something that is proven to be true within a margin of error and everyone bashes the guy, no to mention the car that isn't released and just about promises to be unconditionally awesome.

Cover the tach, lie about the weight, tell them it's naturally aspirated and said sour pusses will say it's the best thing since canned beer.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 09:03 PM   #60
darmawaa
Enlisted Member
9
Rep
48
Posts

Drives: 2017 M2
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Indonesia

iTrader: (0)

It's easy for a turbo engine to rev 8000rpm, Mc laren already did that.
What we need is low end torque (peak torque start @1500 rpm) AND 8000rpm redline.
Mc laren peak torque start @3000 rpm
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 09:09 PM   #61
Mangler
First Lieutenant
Mangler's Avatar
15
Rep
329
Posts

Drives: 08' 335i, ZHP 330i
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southeast

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
88 .  [0.00]
2008 BMW 335i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brosef
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
No, it's only 600rpm apart... Or 7,8%

Hardly worlds apart...

The E30 M3 S14 engine had a rev limit of 7300rpm

The E36 M3 S50 engine had a rev limit of 7200rpm

The E46 M3 S54 engine had a rev limit of 8000rpm

The E9x M3 S65 engine has a rev limit of 8300rpm

Never heard much complaint about low rev limit on the prevoius straight engine M3's before...
tough to settle for a hamburger after you've had steak.
I know. After the e30 they have all been mutton.

T
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 09:12 PM   #62
Mangler
First Lieutenant
Mangler's Avatar
15
Rep
329
Posts

Drives: 08' 335i, ZHP 330i
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southeast

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
88 .  [0.00]
2008 BMW 335i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProbyOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Thanks. Although it is quick to do I don't want to analyze video after video. Anyone can do this with a plethora of free audio tools on any OS. A quick analysis of this one though around 4:24 indicated a much lower peak rpm than the 7000 rpm redline. The method is absolutely not 100% robust for all recordings but the baseline cases of the dyno runs completely convinced me that it can work. I suspect one reason here is simply the fact of internal vs. external audio. It's no doubt the design of passenger vehicles is to drown out a significant portion of engine and exhaust noise.
I also tested a few different dyno runs for various cars before convincing myself that it would work. With the right equipment it would be a pretty good way for racing teams to keep an eye (ear?) on the competition

I didn't have any good audio software on the computer and resorted to matching frequency by using this tone synthesizer http://www.philtulga.com/tone.html. Obviously Audacity is much more accurate with clear audio... I expected to be within ~5-10 Hz based on matching a few other cars really well.

I have a new appreciation for hitting the rev limiter on the dyno. We need someone to get out there with a good mic and radar gun
There's a free app called RTA. It s a 1/3 octave RTA and it will give the the entire spectrum of frequencies of whatever the source it.

T
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 09:23 PM   #63
OrangeCrush
Lieutenant Colonel
OrangeCrush's Avatar
1238
Rep
1,963
Posts

Drives: VO 1M #513/740
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Thanks Swamp! Well done!
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 09:49 PM   #64
zuggerat89
Still waiting...
zuggerat89's Avatar
United_States
25
Rep
887
Posts

Drives: OGV
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Monmouth County, NJ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by StealYourFace
I love all the sour pusses on this board hahaha. Some forum guy made an assumption based on something that is proven to be true within a margin of error and everyone bashes the guy, no to mention the car that isn't released and just about promises to be unconditionally awesome.

Cover the tach, lie about the weight, tell them it's naturally aspirated and said sour pusses will say it's the best thing since canned beer.
Sour pusses is right!

Every journalist on earth said the E46 M3 exhaust note sounded like garbage when it first came out, everyone whined about the rasp. Now it's loved, go figure.

This car, like past generations, will be amazing, and just like in past generations, the car will sound amazing [at high revs].
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 10:01 PM   #65
mkoesel
Moderator
United_States
7538
Rep
19,368
Posts

Drives: No BMW for now
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

iTrader: (1)

The S50B30 was limited to 7200RPM, the S50B32 upped that to 7600RPM.

At any rate they have been steadily pushing the state of the art and increasing max RPM since the very first M3, and that's largely why there have been no complaints in that area. This will be the first time they go back the other way for the M I6. Note that I am not suggesting the engine will be inadequate for this reason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
No, it's only 600rpm apart... Or 7,8%

Hardly worlds apart...

The E30 M3 S14 engine had a rev limit of 7300rpm

The E36 M3 S50 engine had a rev limit of 7200rpm

The E46 M3 S54 engine had a rev limit of 8000rpm

The E9x M3 S65 engine has a rev limit of 8300rpm

Never heard much complaint about low rev limit on the prevoius straight engine M3's before...
Appreciate 0
      07-25-2013, 10:10 PM   #66
Kuwen
Private First Class
3
Rep
150
Posts

Drives: 2015 M3 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zuggerat89 View Post
Sour pusses is right!

Every journalist on earth said the E46 M3 exhaust note sounded like garbage when it first came out, everyone whined about the rasp. Now it's loved, go figure.

This car, like past generations, will be amazing, and just like in past generations, the car will sound amazing [at high revs].
E46 noises are some of my favorite sounds on the road. The key is sounding unique / special, and from what we've seen/heard, is where we're headed (imo).
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2014 bmw m3, 2014 m3, 2014 m3 forum, 2015 bmw m3, 2015 bmw m4, 2015 m3, 2015 m4, bmw f80, bmw f80 forum, bmw f80 forums, bmw f80 m3, bmw f80 m3 sedan, bmw f82, bmw f82 forum, bmw f82 forums, bmw f82 m3, bmw f82 m3 coupe, bmw f82 m3 forum, bmw f82 m4, bmw f82 m4 coupe, bmw f83, bmw f83 m3, bmw f83 m4, bmw m forum, bmw m forums, bmw m4, bmw m4 coupe, bmw m4 coupe forum, bmw m4 forum, bmw m4 forums, f80, f80 forum, f80 forums, f80 m3, f80 m3 forum, f80 m3 forums, f80 m3 sedan, f82, f82 coupe, f82 forum, f82 forums, f82 m3, f82 m3 coupe, f82 m3 forum, f82 m4, f82 m4 coupe, f82 m4 forum, f82 m4 forums, f83 m3, f83 m4, m forum, m forums, m3 f80, m3 f80 forum, m3 f80 forums, m4 forum, m4 forums

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST