04-18-2016, 03:09 PM | #23 | ||
Major General
3221
Rep 6,218
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2016, 09:50 AM | #24 |
Lieutenant Colonel
81
Rep 1,510
Posts |
Just tested the Solo/CAN solution on track.
Good news is that the Solo/CAN wiring worked great and it's a very simple install primarily following Tom's awron install instructions. The Solo connector has 4 marked cables, 12V, GND, CAN+ & CAN-, you can tap into them via the FEM_BODY module: Connector 3 Pin 20: 12V Connector 3 Pin 24: GND Connector 8 Pin 47: CAN- Connector 8 Pin 48: CAN+ The usual warning, this may cause damage to your car, if you try this you're on your own. A vendor that has historically sold Solo CAN harnesses will have an F8x solution soon, you may want to wait for the "clean" solution. Bad news is that the amount of channels currently available for the Fxx platform is incomplete, compared to what was available in the e9x platform. There's no oil/water data, there's no brake pressure data. There are 28 ECU channels in the PT6 (e9x) protocol and only 13 in the new F21 (F8x) protocol, you can do a comparison by going in RaceStudio2 and selecting PT6 and then F21. I've sent a request to Aim support for more F21 ECU channels, let's see what they say. HTH |
Appreciate
3
richf8079.00 |
04-27-2016, 10:15 AM | #25 | |
Private First Class
140
Rep 187
Posts |
Quote:
So what are the 13 channels that are available? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2016, 02:51 PM | #26 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
81
Rep 1,510
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.aim-sportline.com/downloa...II_eng_117.pdf List of F21 ECU channels and descriptions at the bottom of this doc: http://www.aim-sportline.com/downloa...21_101_eng.pdf |
|
Appreciate
1
|
07-08-2016, 07:55 AM | #27 | |
Brigadier General
1593
Rep 3,945
Posts
Drives: 2015 M4 MG/SO
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL, QC
|
Quote:
I was checking few other wiring connections and referencing the FEM A173 Pinout from ISTA/D, i have few questions: A173*3B, info in (): - Pin 20: 12V (Activation relay Terminal 15N, is this switched/ignition ?) - Pin 24: GND (refrigerant pressure sensor ground, why not use pin 6 Ground?) A173*8B: can one use the OBD2 socket (X6) as a solution instead of tapping to A173, as pins X6 6/14 are CAN_H/_L? (There's this X451 terminating resistor...) - Pin 45: Bus signal diagnosis -> X6, Pin 14 D_CAN_L - Pin 46: Bus signal diagnosis -> X6 Pin 6 D_CAN_H - Pin 47: CAN- - Pin 48: CAN+ Thanks! P.s. Vin shown is a random Vin. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-08-2016, 12:45 PM | #28 | |
Second Lieutenant
88
Rep 242
Posts |
I found M laptimer's vs mode very useful:
Since I am not consistent so 20% of my laps are faster than others. Using vs mode tells me where I am faster and why. Sometimes I thought it's because of reason A but end up to be reason B. By using vs mode, I hope I can develop more accurate self analysis so that if I feel good about a lap, I can tell where and why I was faster and use M laptimer to confirm. Once M laptimer has gopro integration, that will be even better. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-08-2016, 05:49 PM | #29 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
8113
Rep 18,808
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Quote:
PIN20 is +12V switched.
__________________
Tom G. | european auto source (eas)
email: tom@europeanautosource.com · web: https://europeanautosource.com· tel 866.669.0705 · ca: 714.369.8524 x22 GET DAILY UPDATES ON OUR BLOG · FACEBOOK · YOUTUBE · FLICKR · INSTAGRAM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 10:58 AM | #30 | |
Private First Class
140
Rep 187
Posts |
Quote:
If they are not going to update, maybe it is not worth it to pay more for the SOLO DL, just get the SOLO base model instead? What do you guys think? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 11:23 AM | #31 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
81
Rep 1,510
Posts |
Quote:
AiM does not appear to be committed to having a full F-series ECU protocol anytime soon. They confirmed the missing channels and stated that any F21 protocol changes will require further development. No ETA and no confirmation that the request will even be addressed. They suggested I switch to the M235i ECU protocol which contains more channels (confirmed, it works on the F8x), however that protocol is also missing brake channels. YMMV but I need real per-corner brake data to have meaningful data analysis, not simulated brake info. I'm still collecting data w/the Solo but looking at alternate solutions. It wouldn't hurt if you guys opened additional support cases with AiM requesting oil/water & per-corner brake data to be added to the F21 protocol. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 12:00 PM | #32 | |
Private First Class
140
Rep 187
Posts |
Thanks for the update. I also sent a request to their technical support in Italy. Doesn't look promising.
Here's the reply: Quote:
Good to know the M235i protocol works on F80. At least it is up to 21 channels. I'll attach the channel list here for others that are interested. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 12:14 PM | #33 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
81
Rep 1,510
Posts |
Quote:
Oil/Water temps on the other hand are indeed very useful (as part of the M235i protocol) albeit not as important in the F8x as they were in the E9x platform. BMW has done a great job keeping the F8x cool on track. I'd be curious as to what information AiM needs from BMW to add brake data to the F21/M235i protocols. Edit: to clarify, BRAKE_STATE has integer values of 0 through 7, so you have an idea of how hard you're braking but nowhere near the granular bar data per corner of the previous protocols. Last edited by mid-corner fun; 07-26-2016 at 12:26 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 01:31 PM | #35 |
Brigadier General
1593
Rep 3,945
Posts
Drives: 2015 M4 MG/SO
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL, QC
|
M3Tooner , mid-corner fun , does the M laptimer, see my pic attached with DSC intervention I think, capture what you guys are discussing re braking? If yes, the data is available and is being sent to the app, so it's a matter for someone to figure out how to retrieve/access this information. The bootmod3 platform from PTF lists brake pressure as a data logging point, so maybe get PTF to talk to AIM
The AIM still interfaces to the CAN bus, but our cars have an ENET interface that is limitless if one knows where and what to look for! (I don't ) |
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 02:14 PM | #36 | |
Private First Class
140
Rep 187
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 02:42 PM | #37 |
Brigadier General
1593
Rep 3,945
Posts
Drives: 2015 M4 MG/SO
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL, QC
|
@M3Tooner , i can assure you that this was not me braking if you look closer to the very fast variations in brake pressure, and trust me, I am not that quick! I agree for DSC, you'd need individual brake data, but that pic shows somewhat what DSC was doing as I wasn't braking in that curve and it's a curve you don't brake in, or you just tap the brakes, but lost control in wet, and the DSC was there to save my ass.
In any case, you confirmed that the M laptimer does show some brake data (its brake acceleration in units of g??) and it's not on or off, if you look at an M laptimer event you see it varying all along, you probably knew this... I've attached few more shots when I tap the brakes. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 03:15 PM | #38 | |
Private First Class
140
Rep 187
Posts |
Ok, I missed that the units are in g's. That cannot be brake pedal data then. It is the longitudinal g-sensor displaying your deceleration g's. Obviously you don't even need to touch the brake pedal to register deceleration g's, which explains what you are seeing. The spikes in your data is likely the by product of DSC intervention causing a jerkiness in the car and registering as deceleration g's.
Looking at this website, it confirms there is no brake pressure data recorded in M laptimer. http://www.bmw.com/com/en/owners/bmw...mw_m_laptimer/ Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
|
07-26-2016, 05:33 PM | #39 |
Captain
450
Rep 992
Posts |
I hate that M-laptimer often crashes itself and doesn't save data. Also it seems like when I spin out and stalls the car (6MT), it dumps the data it was recording as well.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 06:21 PM | #40 |
Brigadier General
1593
Rep 3,945
Posts
Drives: 2015 M4 MG/SO
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL, QC
|
Maybe it crashes because you are driving too fast! It's been ok si far on my iPhone 6 w 5 different sessions.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 06:28 PM | #41 |
Brigadier General
1593
Rep 3,945
Posts
Drives: 2015 M4 MG/SO
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL, QC
|
@M3Tooner given the info you found, it makes me think that maybe some of the lateral/longitudinal is maybe obtained from the iPhone accelerometer although the linked page says it's from sensors! But back to the subject at hand, so then maybe BMW doesn't expose brake pressure data???
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 07:37 PM | #42 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
81
Rep 1,510
Posts |
Quote:
quick example of what we're talking about: same 2 turns at NJMP Thunderbolt, hard braking at T1, tap at T2, via the same Solo DL unit: F80 brake data (unknown unit of measurement): e92 M3 brake data (bar pressure): ignore the lift, picked a random sample to demonstrate the difference in granularity. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2016, 08:29 PM | #43 |
Brigadier General
1593
Rep 3,945
Posts
Drives: 2015 M4 MG/SO
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL, QC
|
@mid-corner fun , BMW would never provide any internal proprietary data! Maybe to partners but don't know. That E92 brakes graph looks close to what we have on the m laptimer, although we know in F8x it's not that ne the E92 data is per wheel?... that's pretty cool !
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-06-2016, 06:38 PM | #44 | |
Captain
450
Rep 992
Posts |
Quote:
By the way, there is a free lesson gift from BMW in m-laptimer data that I am sure most will overlook. If you look at the data from Mike@ BMW Performance Center, you can see how he does trail braking, trailing throttle and all the goodies! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|