| 09-06-2025, 09:28 AM | #23 | |
|
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() 6941
Rep 12,737
Posts |
Quote:
I expect the numbers to go down now that the government subsidy is expiring. Anyway, the high percentage of leased BMWs is not significantly due to BEVs because BEVs make up only a small minority of BMW cars sold in the US. The small minority of about 13% is much more than the 3-4% that I believed, and I acknowledged that. |
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 09-07-2025, 03:36 PM | #24 | |
|
Major
![]() 1721
Rep 1,060
Posts
Drives: M8C Coupe,E63s ED1,AMG GTC
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Upper Midwest
|
Quote:
Rather it can make great financial sense. Tax-wise for a business, leasing is typically more advantageous. Leases are fixed costs and can serve as a hedge against depreciation. Not just EV's but most models. It's very rare that the ACV is higher than the residual value at the end of the lease. If it is you can buy out the lease, if it isn't BMW Financial takes the loss. As mentioned, the $7500 tax credits were only available for leases for most BMW's due to the low limit of the EV's MSRP. So a no-brainer... Even without the tax incentive it's a no-brainer due to the shorter lease-terms; this is something of great value when technology moves forward as fast as it does with EV's. Also, with financing no matter how good (or low) the rates are you will never know how good of a deal you made. That only happens when you sell the car and tally up the costs years later and know how much, or how little you got for your car. Last but not least, buying a car with cash gives you typically the worst deal and lowest discounts. Car dealers are not interested in cash as the cars financing delivers additional income through the shared-profit models on the financing rates. |
|
|
Appreciate
3
|
| 09-07-2025, 03:40 PM | #25 | |
|
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]()
4131
Rep 10,774
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
"Drive more, worry less. "
435i, MPPK, MPE, M-Sport Line |
|
|
Appreciate
1
afadeev3579.50 |
| 09-07-2025, 05:29 PM | #26 |
|
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() 6941
Rep 12,737
Posts |
Probably the car companies underestimated how fast BEV would depreciate and lost money on the leases. They may have even been subsidized to begin with to try to gain market share.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
| 09-07-2025, 08:21 PM | #27 | |||
|
Brigadier General
![]() 3580
Rep 3,156
Posts |
Quote:
See for yourself: https://www.bmwusa.com/special-offers-new.html#/ This approach seams to be working for them, since BMW has been to top luxury brand seller in the US over the last decade. Think about it - would you rather incentivize your customers to buy a new car every 2-3 years (lease), or every 5-10 years (buy)? Quote:
I'm not sure what the relative lease take rate is on ECE vs. hybrid vs. BEV. I'm not sure it matters. The OP's question was whether or not 90% lease take rates are possible, and as defined (non-cash purchases being 2/3s for the transactions, and leases might well be 90% of those) it is. I'm not saying it's good or bad, just that it is what it is. Quote:
I've usually bought mine, but leased a few. One was because I was waiting on F80 M3 to come out, so I leased an E90 335i to tide me over. Then I lased my first EV since I didn't know if I would like it. I did, so I bought by next few. YMMV, a
__________________
'15 F80 M3 (SO/SS)
'21 TM3P (Blue/White) '25 Lexus RZ (White/Blue) ex-'17 I01 i3-BEV (PB/DD), ex-'15 I01 i3-REX, ex-E90, E46, E36's, E30's |
|||
|
Appreciate
1
Phillies80081032.50 |
Post Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|