01-29-2020, 10:54 AM | #23 |
Private First Class
72
Rep 164
Posts |
I've never had a mustang that could keep up with me and I'm just FBO on 92. But I'm pretty sure none were E85 so that would probably be a good race
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-29-2020, 05:34 PM | #24 |
Wingman
1854
Rep 1,882
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-29-2020, 06:35 PM | #25 |
Private First Class
72
Rep 164
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-30-2020, 03:52 PM | #26 |
Brigadier General
1397
Rep 3,152
Posts |
Just the BM3 OTS E30 mix. Nothing custom.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-30-2020, 03:53 PM | #27 |
Brigadier General
1397
Rep 3,152
Posts |
Haha, thats a supercharged shelby. All MT though.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2020, 10:49 AM | #30 |
Legend
97
Rep 166
Posts |
If by bolt-ons you mean bolt-on boost then yes. Otherwise an NA mustang isn't hitting 9's unless its stripped and built trans plus everything else in needs in suspension. I lived in the S550 community since 2015 when I got mine. I ran 9.4's and mine laid down 856 rear whp to get there plus built trans etc..
My M3 is basically stock right now (front mount Intake and vrsf single mid pipe) and I just walked away from and FBO S197 and was only slowly pulled on by a 2018 10R80 E85 mustang. Yes roll race since an M3, even wth DR's can seem to go lower than a 1.8 60ft there is no point in trying to go from a dig. My mustang cut 1.4s with no issues. Evidence of my experience
__________________
Insta: @TexasF80 | YouTube:lvnvevo
Supported by: Limitless Car Care | Braum Racing | Opt7 | MRR Wheels |
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2020, 06:05 AM | #31 | |
Major
255
Rep 1,165
Posts
Drives: f83 / E93 335 / E70 X5 40d
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
TexasF8096.50 |
04-16-2020, 06:06 AM | #32 | |
Private
41
Rep 77
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2015 M4 - VRSF Catless DP, BMC HP Filters, Mishi HE, Mishi Catch Can, Mishi Charge Pipes, NGK SILZKBR8F8S, E85 Cary Jordan Tune S2 Hybrid, BM3
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2020, 08:29 AM | #33 |
Gone Fishin’
7315
Rep 12,125
Posts |
I have a whole lot of seat time in both cars in manual transmission spec. As others have said with e85 the M4 is gonna win by a good bit. Ill take the Mustang if it has e85 and the M is on pump.
As far as owning one Ill take the e85 Coyote. Both are fun but only one sounds good. Give me a GT Premium PP2 with the Recaro buckets. 45k all day long. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2020, 06:47 AM | #34 |
Captain
558
Rep 879
Posts |
I just ran with a cool Mustang owner I ran into on the road the other day. He had a passenger and I was alone.
He was a 18/19 GT and he "said" he was bone stock. May have been the performance package though. It had stripes down the middle but was def a GT. Don't know if the stripes mean anything on a Mustang. Anyhow, I am on BM3 Stage 1 - 93 oct (6MT). I was shocked at how fast that car was up to the 130s. We were essentially dead even all the way up. I was expecting to start walking away from him at some point and it never actually happened. So many variables to this story (regarding what this Mustang was actually running), but that car moved!!!
__________________
Previously:
2010 E92 335 (6MT) 2011 E92 M3 ZCP (6MT) |
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2020, 10:43 AM | #35 |
Major
806
Rep 1,367
Posts |
18+ A10 is actually a bit quicker than the GT 350. The manual in the GT 350 slows it down, even though it’s 525 BHP. I walked one in my 240 when I was just BM3 Stage 2 93.
__________________
2017 M240i/ ZF8 Pure Drivetrain Solutions Stage 1 & torque converter/xHP/ Pure 800 cast/ DS2/ E40 Doug Newton tuned/ ER catless DP/ Remus axle back/ BMS intake/ FTP CP/ M Performance LSD
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2020, 04:44 PM | #36 | |
Captain
1121
Rep 845
Posts |
Quote:
i don't think so, but yes when i posted I was thinking about the pre 18 5.0s. The current 5.0 and the F8x are too close to compare but the F8x is tunable for a few hundred bucks and leaves it hanging. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-15-2020, 08:50 PM | #37 |
Major
806
Rep 1,367
Posts |
^^
Not sure about over 120, but the 10A is impressive. Seems like a few dozen of the 525 horses in the GT-350 are out to pasture, from what I've read and seen. Sounds insane though.
__________________
2017 M240i/ ZF8 Pure Drivetrain Solutions Stage 1 & torque converter/xHP/ Pure 800 cast/ DS2/ E40 Doug Newton tuned/ ER catless DP/ Remus axle back/ BMS intake/ FTP CP/ M Performance LSD
|
Appreciate
1
ntg442887.50 |
05-16-2020, 01:31 PM | #38 | |
Colonel
2888
Rep 2,147
Posts |
Quote:
I don't even think the 5.2 sounds that great. It's like Ford didn't want to fully commit to the FPC sound, so they have this half-ass tone between cross and flat plane to not piss off mustang customers. I love everything else about the 350, I'm not just purposely crapping on it. I just think Ford could have done better with the 5.2, because the newer 5.0 to me is a way better engine.
__________________
YT: ntg44
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2020, 07:31 PM | #39 | |
New Member
17
Rep 28
Posts |
Quote:
I'm not sure if the 5.2 is better than the 5.0 or not, but my 17' GT350 is twin turbo'd, with 1470 whp, and is without issue. The initial build, with basically a stock motor, and netted 1143 whp. I would think that it's every bit as good as the 5.0's. For road course comparisons, I have seen GT350r's and M4 GTS's run neck and neck, so close it comes down to the driver's skill set. For "drag racing" I would give the edge to the M4, but most people drag racing either or these cars probably aren't drag racers, but more likely enthusiasts, and stock, neither cars are that impressive from my point of view. Regarding the comment above regarding tuning..... There are tons of cheap tunes available for both the M4's and Mustangs, and as expected, both platforms have thread after thread on respective forums (including this one) about problems with "cheap". |
|
05-16-2020, 08:05 PM | #40 |
Colonel
2888
Rep 2,147
Posts |
Thanks for your insight, really shortened your quote to save space.
I knew my post would be unpopular haha, but it's just my opinion, nothing more. And to clarify, I didn't call the 350 lame. Far from it. I LOVE the car, and think it's more of an M car than the M3/4. I just think the 5.2 in stock form doesn't feel like 525 HP as much as other cars with that much power. Maybe it's the gearing, maybe it's the power delivery, or the weight. Not sure. And I by no means am saying the M3/4 sounds better, never did. I just don't care for the 5.2's exhaust note for a V8. I think cross planes and Ferrari V8s sound better. Just personal preference.
__________________
YT: ntg44
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-17-2020, 04:57 AM | #41 | |
New Member
17
Rep 28
Posts |
Quote:
After saying this, I still daily drive (mostly) the M4 DCT, its quick, well built, handles well, easier to drive and quieter. Tomorrow I start down the tuning road, but won't go too deep as the M4 is my work car. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-20-2020, 11:09 PM | #42 | |
Private
72
Rep 98
Posts |
Quote:
point is get em on the dig
__________________
paul dangelo
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2020, 08:15 AM | #43 |
Private First Class
30
Rep 141
Posts |
Update finally I know lol: I got him on a 40 twice and he pulled on a 50
|
Appreciate
1
elinstylez268.50 |
07-27-2020, 09:49 PM | #44 |
Captain
269
Rep 607
Posts |
Last Friday I ran into a 5.0 on the fwy. I'm fbo with e85 and I was surprised I was only slowly walking away from him.
He never caught up and we ended up at the same e85 station and I noticed he had drag radials. He was visibly upset and wouldn't even look at me for a friendly nod haha. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|