|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Intelliprice did not overestimate like kbb.com
|
|
01-18-2008, 05:34 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant General
1705
Rep 14,829
Posts |
Intelliprice did not overestimate like kbb.com
Intelliprice shows my 335 coupe as 32-37k, so let's say 35k. A nice 9k loss which is what I suspected...pretty high cost for 5500 miles.
kbb.com shows it at 43k. If I could get 43k, I'd take it! Doesn't take a genius to realize that's wrong on a 46,470 list. |
01-18-2008, 12:32 PM | #2 |
New Member
0
Rep 20
Posts |
I find that nada values are more inline, but they can all be off. My IS300 was totaled a few weeks ago and I was researching to prepare for an insurance company battle. kbb listed it at $12k trade-in and $15k private party. Nada listed it at $14k trade in and $17k private party. I looked through auto trader, dealer websites and carmax and the average asking price for the same year and mileage was around $17,500. So nada was fairly accurate there.
Luckily, my insurance company apparently uses neither and instead pulls numbers out of a magic hat as they gave me $20k for it... |
Appreciate
0
|
01-18-2008, 12:34 PM | #3 | |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 288
Posts
Drives: Soon 2015 M4
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-18-2008, 01:07 PM | #4 |
Major General
865
Rep 5,450
Posts |
KBB is always high - the dealer will tell you to do trade fair condition and then the price comes out more accurate - NADA is usually a bit better, but it is also off sometimes.
KBB trade fair condition is $34765 on your car, so $35k is a good assumption. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|